Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mark and Patricia McCloskey
#40
(06-30-2020, 10:14 AM)Wallfire Wrote:
(06-29-2020, 07:09 PM)Ninurta Wrote:
(06-29-2020, 01:31 PM)hounddoghowlie Wrote:
(06-29-2020, 11:52 AM)drussell41 Wrote: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/gun-...iral-video

Okay, is this even real?   She's posing like she thinks she a Charlie's Angel, and.....   who brings a small handgun like that to confront a mob?  She needs to rethink this whole situation.

looks like a .380 might be wrong. but if it is a .380 it can and will kill you just as dead as any other caliber. chances are 85 to 95 percent of the protesters will run when shootin starts, those that don't, will either try to hide behind something or have a gun themselves. Missouri is a premissive open carry state, so protesters just might be packin.

after enlarging  and looking a little closer the barrel looks a little small, could be a .22 or.25, not the best for self defense but will do the job. but might only piss a big man off, if not hit in the right spot.

also, looking at the one picture, it's kinda hard to tell just how close and what angle she is standing at in relation to her husband. but it's clear she doesn't know much about gun safety. it looks like the pistol is pointed at his head and her finger is on the trigger.
[Image: EbppxhdXQAE1CW1?format=jpg&name=small]

[Image: 5ef954f727755.image_.jpg?itok=qzx4A0rs]

Yeah, it's either a .32 or a .38, probably a .32, and it'll put the hurt on a protester if she can hit 'em. Even a .22 will work, 'cause no one WANTS to be shot! - and .22s have been the choice of professional assassins for decades. They're quieter and get the job done, you just have to pump 3 - 5 rounds into the target in a rapid succession.

All of the defensive shootings I've seen video of lately have the crowd dispersing and unassing the AO in a hell of a hurry as soon as caps start getting busted, but you can't count on it because some of the core cadre for Antifa have combat training and experience with the Marxist PKK terrorists. And as someone else observed, they are increasingly becoming armed. So, if you have to shoot, don't shoot to scare or tickle 'em, shoot to render them inoperative. VERY inoperative.

And, as someone else also observed, you won't get any more time for 50 than you will for one, so the more the merrier.

The article says they got in a "shouting match" with the rioters. Yes, rioters - if they're trespassing on private property and have destroyed a gate, it's no longer a protest. Shouting matches are stupid and non-productive. Loud bangs carry a message farther. I'd pump one - that's ONE - round into the ground at their feet, and then if they keep coming, light them up. 

Words are not necessary. Actions speak louder than words.

And people wonder why I have 40 round mags for my AR and 32 round mags for my sidearm... When a crowd is rushing you, it's a pain in the ass to have to change magazines.

That gateway was an excellent choke point - why were the rioters allowed to get past it where they could spread out? This could all have been prevented by one round into the ground at the gate while they were assailing the gate and destroying it.

See how they run...

.
Rich man and woman open fire on peaceful demonstrators. People need to start understanding how propaganda works, because this fight is not going to be won with guns but with propaganda

Then are we SOL, because we do not control the mass media?


Messages In This Thread
Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 11:52 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by F2d5thCav - 06-29-2020, 11:55 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Snarl - 06-29-2020, 02:30 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by wessonoil - 06-30-2020, 01:35 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 03:05 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 10:41 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 09:49 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-29-2020, 07:09 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Lumenari - 06-29-2020, 10:49 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Snarl - 06-29-2020, 11:33 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 01:07 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Snarl - 06-30-2020, 02:04 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 04:37 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Wallfire - 06-30-2020, 10:14 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 10:46 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 11:23 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by F2d5thCav - 06-29-2020, 02:10 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by BIAD - 06-29-2020, 02:14 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Schmoe1 - 06-29-2020, 05:46 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by BIAD - 06-29-2020, 02:14 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 03:07 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 03:04 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by beez - 06-29-2020, 03:08 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Snarl - 06-29-2020, 05:16 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Bally002 - 06-29-2020, 11:28 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-29-2020, 11:11 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 12:24 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 09:37 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Ninurta - 06-30-2020, 11:28 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 03:27 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by kdog - 06-29-2020, 11:48 PM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by kdog - 06-30-2020, 01:41 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by Anathros - 06-30-2020, 04:50 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 10:03 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by drussell41 - 06-30-2020, 09:24 AM
RE: Mark and Patricia McCloskey - by BIAD - 06-30-2020, 12:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)