Thread Rating:
  • 6 Vote(s) - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The difference between a book and a statue
#13
(06-23-2020, 03:37 AM)Lumenari Wrote:
(06-23-2020, 03:26 AM)Phage  Yes. One which one has no choice but to view when it is in a public place. Wrote: When I visited Paris a few years ago I went to the Rodin museum. There was a Robert Maplethorpe exhibit there. I had no interest in seeing it. I was able to avoid seeing it because it was in a separate part of the museum. It was not in the town square.

So the separate part of the museum was not a place that the public could go to?

And are not Libraries open to the public?

Also...
Are not statues considered works of art?
But some need destroyed now because... feelz?
So Piss Jesus good, Andrew Jackson bad?

Where in the Constitution does it say "I have the right not to be offended?"

tinyhuh
Yes. If one wanted to see the exhibit, one could go see it.
If one wants to read a book, one may choose to do so.

The claim was that removing a statue to a museum is the same as book burning. It isn't.


Messages In This Thread
RE: The difference between a book and a statue - by Phage - 06-23-2020, 03:39 AM
RE: The difference between a book and a statue - by Wallfire - 06-23-2020, 10:25 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)