I'm mulling on a couple of 'nowism' questions at the moment.
If this was an official investigation, then why would this 'whistle-blower' need to be kept anonymous?
I would assume that this 'thinly veiled CIA operative' working in the White House is known as a 'thinly
veiled CIA operative' by those who work alongside him or her!
Then, with guaranteed certainty that this operative is working within the Government's strict ruling that
no CIA employee can operate in 'spy-mode' within the United States, work-colleagues can feel a little
safer that they're not being monitored by an external agency.
Because if not, the Democratic Party are pompously demanding the human listening-device should remain
in the President's residence. And that's the Stasi way.
..............................
In the supposed air of transparency and political maturity, there's a behind-closed-doors Hearing about
what a President said to another leader of a country. Disregarding the transcript of that telephone call,
wasn't the Burisma Holdings investigation part of a wider US investigation from 2016 in regards of the
of the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 United States election?
Would it not be appropriate to ask how a Ukraine-led investigation of those from the Burisma company
was going? After all, a former US Vice-President and leading politician's son was working for the firm
and whether there's a lead there or not, it could smear Hunter Biden's career if he has no connection
with the never-ceasing corruption within that particular business.
...........................
No, it's just play-acting for the audience. Donald Trump is bad and the establishment politicians, the
paid-for corrupt media and assumed-naive activists that grace the television screens every evening
will accept that a majority of the sleeping public have woken up.
As said by ZeroHedge, the Democrats have nothing to offer that public except the rules that they are
subservient to their betters. Namely, Pelosi and the stuff she has on her shoe... stuff called Schumer.
It must be difficult to accept that something as true as breathing air, is now being challenged to these
embedded thieves.
They make their fortunes by creating laws that benefit business and the bank transfers are never queried.
They live lifestyles far-removed from those they're alleged to represent and the media never cast negatives
towards them. They have those doubt their behavior politically eradicated and ruined and sometimes worse.
In a real world, a genuine media would be using all their ties to discover the name of this person who did
a 'REO Speedwagon' on the phone call. But in a real world, a genuine media wouldn't call official press-releases
'leaks' and only ask inane questions of political figures in order to prop up their dying trade.
The reality that many of us live in is fake... and it took a former Game-show celebrity and wealthy New York
property-shark to tell us so.
If this was an official investigation, then why would this 'whistle-blower' need to be kept anonymous?
I would assume that this 'thinly veiled CIA operative' working in the White House is known as a 'thinly
veiled CIA operative' by those who work alongside him or her!
Then, with guaranteed certainty that this operative is working within the Government's strict ruling that
no CIA employee can operate in 'spy-mode' within the United States, work-colleagues can feel a little
safer that they're not being monitored by an external agency.
Because if not, the Democratic Party are pompously demanding the human listening-device should remain
in the President's residence. And that's the Stasi way.
..............................
In the supposed air of transparency and political maturity, there's a behind-closed-doors Hearing about
what a President said to another leader of a country. Disregarding the transcript of that telephone call,
wasn't the Burisma Holdings investigation part of a wider US investigation from 2016 in regards of the
of the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 United States election?
Would it not be appropriate to ask how a Ukraine-led investigation of those from the Burisma company
was going? After all, a former US Vice-President and leading politician's son was working for the firm
and whether there's a lead there or not, it could smear Hunter Biden's career if he has no connection
with the never-ceasing corruption within that particular business.
...........................
No, it's just play-acting for the audience. Donald Trump is bad and the establishment politicians, the
paid-for corrupt media and assumed-naive activists that grace the television screens every evening
will accept that a majority of the sleeping public have woken up.
As said by ZeroHedge, the Democrats have nothing to offer that public except the rules that they are
subservient to their betters. Namely, Pelosi and the stuff she has on her shoe... stuff called Schumer.
It must be difficult to accept that something as true as breathing air, is now being challenged to these
embedded thieves.
They make their fortunes by creating laws that benefit business and the bank transfers are never queried.
They live lifestyles far-removed from those they're alleged to represent and the media never cast negatives
towards them. They have those doubt their behavior politically eradicated and ruined and sometimes worse.
In a real world, a genuine media would be using all their ties to discover the name of this person who did
a 'REO Speedwagon' on the phone call. But in a real world, a genuine media wouldn't call official press-releases
'leaks' and only ask inane questions of political figures in order to prop up their dying trade.
The reality that many of us live in is fake... and it took a former Game-show celebrity and wealthy New York
property-shark to tell us so.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.