09-28-2019, 06:27 AM
(09-26-2019, 06:02 PM)guohua Wrote: ost Number Two,,,,,
Who has read the Document?
Source
or try here: Second Source
Well! that was an interesting read. I surmise that the dog-whistler is either CIA or State, and works from the Russia or Ukraine desk in one of those agencies.
Interesting how he ran with the story as presented to him, with no evidence whatsoever.
Also interesting how he threw Biden and the DNC under the bus. It's hard to believe that he didn't know what he was doing, but it is possible.
There is a fair amount of legalese in the document, leading me to believe that he probably wrote it through a lawyer.
Much of the legalese is boilerplate "CYA" language, probably intended to shield the dog whistler from consequences.
Odd how some of the information released in the "non-classified letter" portion was actually classified in the classified appendices, but was released nonetheless "in the clear" of the "unclassified" portion. I don't think boilerplate legalese that really just means "I ain't guilty because I didn't believe it was classified" will fly in that situation. Generally, it won't fly in ANY situation. For example, Hillary did not have to know that the information she was storing on an unsecured server was classified to be guilty of storing it in such manner. "Intent" is not an element of thse particular crimes.
Interesting read.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’