(06-25-2019, 06:03 AM)Armonica_Templar Wrote:Quote:'....“When complaints are received, we may also provide the uploader a chance to remove or edit private information in their video.”...'
Well that's bullsh*t for many of the YouTube users!
But the bottom line is that for many years now, we've been quietly led into believing that products, information,
entertainment and responsibility are the decided by set of a 'chosen' set of people and the viewer/reader is incapable
of making those decisions for themselves.
If a person wishes to follow snake-oil salesmen, then they should be free to do so and only if that decision impacts on
another person, should there be any available assistance. You cannot be neutral and have preferences without acquiring
the moniker 'Gate-Keeper'.
However, we're so far down the road of being sheep that any push-back is deemed 'hateful' or you're accuesed of belonging
to a group of violent anarchy-loving revolutionists!
Google constantly tells us it is being honest and fair, so Jen Gennai should explain why she used the words 'Trump situation'
in a time when many Google-users believe the internet company favours an alternative political party to the current President's.
Using the term 'misspoke' isn't a viable answer, she never mispronounced the words and surely she can compose a sentence
sensibly enough considering her position in the internet company?!
Remember, the 'Russia-Trump' collusion was a political hoax and yet all the mainstream mediums were allowed to constantly
push it without being held accountable by Google. So why crack down on social commentators who favour rhetoric that favour
the accused President?
Ventura's character in 'Predator' comments that his foe is 'dug in like a Alabama-tic', Google's anti-Trump employees may also
be related to this parasite. One has to wonder if they're doing the damage for free or whether other influences are involved.
Tim Pool is deemed dangerous simply because his leftish-leaning stance and his honesty regarding reporting news offers a
viewer the opportunity to see 'good' examples from what people like Gennai see as the enemy.
Rationality in a news forum is not a good weapon for partisans.
In the video above, Pool doubts his own creation interest as a 'off-set' against YouTube's policing, but he does mention that
YouTube have meetings to quash certain channels. That -in itself, is controlling what people view, but we've accepted this
control for so long that we add it into the equation regarding YouTube's gate-keeping.
And just in case YouTube thinks it still owns the world, here's a link to the video.
Veritas Link: