I believe we're being visited, although I have no idea from where or who they are.
What boils my blood is the way the mainstream narrative gives the impression that the thousands-upon-thousands
of witnesses are suggested as simpletons, drunks and bald-faced liars.
Valuable information is lost in the media circus that treats this subject as a joke and whether it's just a case of towing
the social-control line or lazy investigations, how can the subject still be in the same mental-perception by the masses
as it was back in the fifties?
It's not, of course, it's just there's a lot of work done to maintain that idea.
If the Kelly–Hopkinsville encounter at the Sutton farmhouse was a group of 'ugly Goblins', then why suggest it was
a flock of Horned-owls...?
Or even worse, write this quote:
'...Monkeys represented another “theory.” Supposedly, one or more monkeys had escaped either from a zoo or a
travelling circus. However, there was never any credible evidence of such an escape (Clark 1998; Carlton 2005)..."
So no monkeys were mislaid or even reported, yet it's offered -rather than what the family said they endured.
Words like 'supposedly' are used to imply that what's suggested did happen and and then the usual 'however' walks back
the proposal.
But the stifling is done.
The Flatwoods Monster got the same treatment, except this time it was a barn owl perched in a tree.
When the day comes that we can access genuine material that doesn't offer down-to-earth suggestions, will be
the day we can move on and find out what is really going on.
What boils my blood is the way the mainstream narrative gives the impression that the thousands-upon-thousands
of witnesses are suggested as simpletons, drunks and bald-faced liars.
Valuable information is lost in the media circus that treats this subject as a joke and whether it's just a case of towing
the social-control line or lazy investigations, how can the subject still be in the same mental-perception by the masses
as it was back in the fifties?
It's not, of course, it's just there's a lot of work done to maintain that idea.
If the Kelly–Hopkinsville encounter at the Sutton farmhouse was a group of 'ugly Goblins', then why suggest it was
a flock of Horned-owls...?
Or even worse, write this quote:
'...Monkeys represented another “theory.” Supposedly, one or more monkeys had escaped either from a zoo or a
travelling circus. However, there was never any credible evidence of such an escape (Clark 1998; Carlton 2005)..."
So no monkeys were mislaid or even reported, yet it's offered -rather than what the family said they endured.
Words like 'supposedly' are used to imply that what's suggested did happen and and then the usual 'however' walks back
the proposal.
But the stifling is done.
The Flatwoods Monster got the same treatment, except this time it was a barn owl perched in a tree.
When the day comes that we can access genuine material that doesn't offer down-to-earth suggestions, will be
the day we can move on and find out what is really going on.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.