Bobby Kennedy Jr. Isn't Sure.

[BIAD]

Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn't believe it was Sirhan Sirhan.



'Los Angeles -Just before Christmas, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pulled up to the massive Richard J. Donovan
Correctional Center, a California state prison complex in the desert outside San Diego that holds nearly
4,000 inmates.
Kennedy was there to visit Sirhan B. Sirhan, the man convicted of killing his father, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy,
nearly 50 years ago.

While his wife, actress Cheryl Hines, waited in the car, Robert Kennedy Jr. met with Sirhan for three hours,
he revealed to The Washington Post last week. It was the culmination of months of research by Kennedy
into the assassination, including speaking with witnesses and reading the autopsy and police reports.

"I got to a place where I had to see Sirhan," Kennedy said. He would not discuss the specifics of their conversation.
But when it was over, Kennedy had joined those who believe there was a second gunman, and that it was not Sirhan
who killed his father...'

There's a time in a man's life -especially when there are grey areas in an incident that has profound effects on that
person's life, when unfinished business must be revisited just to make sure the agreed reasons for that incident are
the correct ones. It's always been the quest of an ageing man.

This might seem obvious to some and considering Robert Kennedy Jr.'s access to some of the elite and their inside
opinions, one may think that Bobby Jr.'s true viewpoint would have been made-up a long time ago.
Even with the media being locked down to follow a particular narrative, RFK Jr.'s knowledge of what really happened
to his father and uncle, will have a more serious base than the usual semi-diluted witness accounts that we get to hear.

'..."I went there because I was curious and disturbed by what I had seen in the evidence," said Kennedy, an environmental
lawyer and the third oldest of his father's 11 children. "I was disturbed that the wrong person might have been convicted
of killing my father.
My father was the chief law enforcement officer in this country. I think it would have disturbed him if somebody was put in
jail for a crime they didn't commit."

Kennedy, 64, said he doesn't know if his involvement in the case will change anything...'

Sadly, it won't change anything, his father was well on his way to becoming the next Kennedy to be President. A neutral
observer may suggest that considering the controversy around John Kennedy's assassination, his brother just might
reopen the case. That just cannot happen.

William  Attwood -who served in JFK's presidency campaign and later became the Ambassador to the West African
country of Guinea during John Kennedy's reign, told Bobby Kennedy that he'd met with the attorney Jim Garrison and
had been convinced that the CIA had killed his brother.
Robert answered that he knew it and the only way he could get the truth out into the open would be to get in the White
House as the next President.

But whether Sirhan Sirhan or the usual suspect -Thane Cesar pulled the trigger, the reality that get's left behind is the
lack of the American public's understanding that those who deal with powerful politics and Banking occasionally request
private and Governmental agencies to take the lives of those who fight against a certain narrative.

Personal wealth and position will always outweigh true justice in a capitalist society. I know that sounds terrible when
discussing life and death, but ask yourself how bad you'd feel about someone dying that you've never met and the whether
the benefits of such a loss that would maintain your family's future would be something you could come to terms with.
Cain has always slew Abel.

Sirhan Sirhan was at the Ambassador Hotel, he had a pistol and he fired it.
Sirhan's original defence lawyer -Grant Cooper, set out his case based on that and never brought the ballistics evidence
into the case and purveyed the impression to the jury that they were merely in court in order to deliver a fair guilty verdict.

Cooper took on the case for the benefit of self-promotion, the jury were bombarded with the impression that they were
dealing with a young and confused Palestinian struggling with a mental deficiency. RFK's wounds and the woodwork and
ceiling tiles in the hotel's kitchen implied a different scenario and yet, Cooper ignored the potential evidence.
Later, it would be revealed that Grant Cooper may have had been compromised due to representing mob-boss Johnny
Roselli in the Friar's Club case

'...But he now supports the call for a re-investigation of the assassination led by Paul Schrade, who also was shot in the
head as he walked behind Kennedy in the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles but survived.

Kennedy was just 14 when he lost his father. Even now, people tell him how much Bobby Kennedy meant to them.

RFK's death -five years after his brother, President John F. Kennedy, was gunned down in Dallas and two months after
civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. was killed in Memphis -devastated a country already beset by chaos.

In 1968, the Vietnam War raged, American cities had erupted in riots after MLK's assassination and tensions between
war protesters and supporters were growing uglier. Robert Kennedy's newly launched presidential bid had raised hopes
that the New York Democrat and former attorney general could somehow unite a divided nation.
The gunshots fired that June night changed all that...'

Doctor Martin Luther King wasn't killed by a lone gunman. That's an official fact. A civil-suit re-trial of James Earl Ray -partly
instigated by the King family, aquitted Ray for the murder of the peaceful activist. The surrounding area of the Lorraine Motel
was flooded with unknown Police and Military personel and even King's originally-booked motel room was changed due to
a phone-call from someone that's never been identified.

By the way, MLK was supposed to be assassinated in Los Angeles and not Memphis.

'...Though Sirhan admitted at his trial in 1969 that he shot Kennedy, he claimed from the start that he had no memory of doing
so. And midway through Sirhan's trial, prosecutors provided his lawyers with an autopsy report that launched five decades
of controversy: Kennedy was shot four times at point-blank range from behind, including the fatal shot behind his ear.

But Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian immigrant, was standing in front of him.
Was there a second gunman? The debate rages to this day...'

It has to 'rage on', not to would mean an alternative result and the distrust that Americans have in their political system would
be stoked once more.

'...But the legal system has not entertained doubts.
A jury convicted Sirhan of first-degree murder and sentenced him to death in 1969, which was commuted to a life term in
1972.

Sirhan's appeals have been rejected at every level, as recently as 2016, even with the courts considering new evidence that
has emerged over the years that as many as 13 shots were fired -Sirhan's gun held only eight bullets -and that Sirhan may
have been subjected to coercive hypnosis, a real life "Manchurian candidate."...'

How does the reader feel about the above paragraph...? Sirhan's .22 caliber Iver-Johnson Cadet revolver held eight bullets
and yet it's proposed -through audio techniques, that thirteen bullets were fired in the hotel's kitchen.
Appeals have been shut and the supposed silliness of Sirhan supposedly being in the company of a girl wearing a polka-dotted
dress is laughed at.

The girl and another male companion were seen running from the pantry after the shooting.
RFK campaign worker Sandy Serrano, taking a break out on a balcony, saw them run from the hotel, the woman gleefully
shouting "We shot him. We shot him." When Serrano asked who they meant, the girl replied "Senator Kennedy."

It's laughable, huh? How can a man be hypnotised and have a handler in a polka-dot dress who directed the man who
shoot a prominant politician? The standard belief is that no human can be convinced to do something they don't want to do.
So thirteen bullets and witnesses to vouch for the 'polka-dot' event -or not, you have to dismiss it.

'...His case is closed. His lawyers are now launching a longshot bid to have the Inter-American Court of Human Rights hold
an evidentiary hearing, while Schrade is hoping for a group such as the Innocence Project to take on the case.
A spokesman for the Innocence Project said they do not discuss cases at the consideration stage.

In the final court rejection of Sirhan's appeals, U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew Wistrich ruled, "Even if the second shooter's
bullet was the one that killed Senator Kennedy, [Sirhan] would be liable [for murder] as an aider and abettor."

And if Sirhan was unaware of the second shooter, Wistrich wrote that the scenario of a second gunman who shot Kennedy
"at close range with the same type of gun and ammunition as [Sirhan] was using, but managed to escape the crowded room
without notice of almost any of the roomful of witnesses, lacks any evidentiary support."...'

SOURCE:

All sorted and all wrapped up. The possible 'Patsy' had a pistol and uttered words of deadly intent and the victim died.
Why worry about another shooter when you have someone accountable? You needed someone to blame and you've got one.
Go back to sleep and the when the newspaper lands on your lawn in the morning, just read it and move on.

(To be Continued)