To a rational outsider looking at the idea of electing candidates for US office, how can it
be that the disparity between what the mainstream media are saying and the actual voting
selection is never seriously discussed?
Trump won when every news outlet and every on-screen pundit stated it was a pushover
for Hillary Clinton. All the information gathered via polls and expert analysis pointed at an
easy Democrat Presidency.
The polls weren't just wrong, they were outrageously wrong and no amount of drinking
champagne on voting day by the Democrat employees can be used as an excuse.
What shocked me at the time... shocked -I say! was the confidence that men and women
on media panels speaking confidently that the politically-inexperienced property and television
personality had no chance of getting the White House.
Now we're farther along in the Trump Presidency and the same multitude of mediums are
rattling-on quoting unknown sources that have hinted at something that if you agree may
have happened, would be a terrible indictment of the leadership of the USA.
Everything Trump does is wrong... that's what it looks like when you listen to CNN and others.
The narrative swings from Donald Trump being a Russian spy to negative comments about his
wife's shoes! It's like tittle-tattle from petulant children!
But someone voted for him and whoever it was were in a majority. So why not report on that?
I mean, is there nobody in charge of the many medias that says "Heh, we're saying one thing
and the public... our prospective customers, many of them are believing the opposite!"
Are the CEOs, Editors and Journalists really so retarded that they can't see that what they've
reported for the last couple of years as been useless in the eyes of the public and the effects
it has on their industry?
I know many will say it's a biased perspective that the MSM have, but if your job is to make
wheels and you've been constructing square-ones that nobody is buying, wouldn't you
build round-ones because that's what the customer prefers?!!
You can't go back once you select a false narrative and I would've thought that those
Journalists with mortgages and college-fees would realise that somewhere along the line,
anyone... absolutely anyone can deliver negative infotainment without the need for a
schooling in ethical journalism.
You're basically putting yourselves out of a job.
This election in Georgia is another clue to what the voters still believe, although the distance
between them seems shorter and considering the amount of Democratic money reported to
have been poured in, it's another sign of how so-called experts can get it wrong.
....................................
So if we go with the narrative that Russia and Donald Trump colluded in obtaining the Presidency,
I would suggest a neutral would say this:
ALL the agencies paid to protect the USA are crap. All investigative medias around the world are
woefully stupid and not only -like the Government agencies, failed to see this coming along the
pipe, they can't deliver the evidence of this accusation.
The American Judicial system is lazy and can't be bothered to take the absolute proof that the
mainstream media must have to say what they're saying, and take Donald Trump from the
White House.
Every day that goes by is an embarrassment on the global stage that shows one man... one
seventy-one year-old man can preside over a country at a supposed-enemy's bidding and nobody
can do anything about it.
Or...
None of it's true and it's just poor journalism by people who's dialectic is so slanted, that it's they
who are making a mockery of the American public and the position of that country's Presidency.
Journalists... you should be ashamed of yourselves.
Edit: But then again, are you really Journalists?
be that the disparity between what the mainstream media are saying and the actual voting
selection is never seriously discussed?
Trump won when every news outlet and every on-screen pundit stated it was a pushover
for Hillary Clinton. All the information gathered via polls and expert analysis pointed at an
easy Democrat Presidency.
The polls weren't just wrong, they were outrageously wrong and no amount of drinking
champagne on voting day by the Democrat employees can be used as an excuse.
What shocked me at the time... shocked -I say! was the confidence that men and women
on media panels speaking confidently that the politically-inexperienced property and television
personality had no chance of getting the White House.
Now we're farther along in the Trump Presidency and the same multitude of mediums are
rattling-on quoting unknown sources that have hinted at something that if you agree may
have happened, would be a terrible indictment of the leadership of the USA.
Everything Trump does is wrong... that's what it looks like when you listen to CNN and others.
The narrative swings from Donald Trump being a Russian spy to negative comments about his
wife's shoes! It's like tittle-tattle from petulant children!
But someone voted for him and whoever it was were in a majority. So why not report on that?
I mean, is there nobody in charge of the many medias that says "Heh, we're saying one thing
and the public... our prospective customers, many of them are believing the opposite!"
Are the CEOs, Editors and Journalists really so retarded that they can't see that what they've
reported for the last couple of years as been useless in the eyes of the public and the effects
it has on their industry?
I know many will say it's a biased perspective that the MSM have, but if your job is to make
wheels and you've been constructing square-ones that nobody is buying, wouldn't you
build round-ones because that's what the customer prefers?!!
You can't go back once you select a false narrative and I would've thought that those
Journalists with mortgages and college-fees would realise that somewhere along the line,
anyone... absolutely anyone can deliver negative infotainment without the need for a
schooling in ethical journalism.
You're basically putting yourselves out of a job.
This election in Georgia is another clue to what the voters still believe, although the distance
between them seems shorter and considering the amount of Democratic money reported to
have been poured in, it's another sign of how so-called experts can get it wrong.
....................................
So if we go with the narrative that Russia and Donald Trump colluded in obtaining the Presidency,
I would suggest a neutral would say this:
ALL the agencies paid to protect the USA are crap. All investigative medias around the world are
woefully stupid and not only -like the Government agencies, failed to see this coming along the
pipe, they can't deliver the evidence of this accusation.
The American Judicial system is lazy and can't be bothered to take the absolute proof that the
mainstream media must have to say what they're saying, and take Donald Trump from the
White House.
Every day that goes by is an embarrassment on the global stage that shows one man... one
seventy-one year-old man can preside over a country at a supposed-enemy's bidding and nobody
can do anything about it.
Or...
None of it's true and it's just poor journalism by people who's dialectic is so slanted, that it's they
who are making a mockery of the American public and the position of that country's Presidency.
Journalists... you should be ashamed of yourselves.
Edit: But then again, are you really Journalists?
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.