(07-24-2018, 07:53 AM)Wallfire Wrote: As you remember a 20 something muslim raped a 10 year old girl in Finland and he got 3 years in prison.
I suppose it was because she was culturally enriched
And this is what I was on about on another thread, the idea of 'culture-worship' versus basic accountability in any
civilised society.
It's been trendy to perceive certain cultures as special and forgive their misdeeds simply because 'they're different'
Isn't that racism...?!
These dickheads who march around with banners are unconsciously conceited and to hide their inner-struggles,
they accuse others of not treating people from other lands with respect, but it's that word that we would initially
think they misunderstood.
Westernised societies respect themselves as a group and as individuals. The agreed standards are acceptable
across a general board, so anyone wishing to participate in that society must adhere to them.
(When in Rome...!)
The respect offered to those from different cultures is the same as the respect held within that community.
No more and no less.
These lib-tards know this. They also know that branding a person with a certain insult and then pushing
the narrative to say -that by being such an individual, you're no longer part of the majority group.
By alienating your thinking, you can then be led back to their camp.
But by using the deceitful art of dividing cultures, these poncy con-artists needed markers to signify who-is-who
and by doing that, they reduced human beings down to 'ins' and 'outs' for demoralisation purposes on the political
battlefield.
That's where skin colour came in.
It's not about Islamism, although the strict code within that ideology holds many societal obstacles -to say the
least!! But it's used because of it's generally-perceived geographical area of the belief.
Namely, the forced-perception of a religion from traditionally non-white countries.
An example in today's corrupt media is Mezut Ozil. He's a German professional football (soccer)-player who
plays for Arsenal FC in the UK and Germany's national team. A couple of months ago, he appeared at a charity
function and because his ancestors roots were in Turkey, he was pleased to shake hands with another visitor
at the charity meeting, the controversial Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Mezut Ozil is deemed white, he was born in Gelsenkirchen in Germany and a muslim.
But until Germany got knocked out of the World Cup competition in June, he'd quietly gone about his career
and ignored the racial abuse that's been shackled to being of Eurasian-descent.
Now... two months later -and after already announcing he was retiring his international career, the media have
jumped on him because he met with Erdogan during a photo-op of displaying an Arsenal football shirt with the
Turkish leader.
To hell with the virtue-signalling act of charity today, the establishment's seagull-Press wanted to rip into the
hard-line Erdogan and woe be tide anyone who got near him. In London... at a Charity function, posing with
a 'Emirates' football shirt.
Conveniently, the same media didn't look at Rwanda sponsoring that football club to promote tourism to the
impoverished country or the shirt sponsor 'Emirates' -the airline funded by the Dubia Royal family with Pakistan
International Airlines, as a signifier that Mezut Ozil had tied his star to multiculturism.
No, The Turkish President is today's 'bad guy' and the white muslim with the sublime passing abilities was to
pay the toll.
If Ozil's skin-colour had been brown, the media would've stifled this story in Germany and it would've never made
it to the world press. He's wealthy, he has disciplines of a professional footballer and he has represented his country
on the world stage of football.
But he's perceived as a white guy who met Erdogan and that's enough to go after him.
Africans, African Americans and Mexicans are being given the pass Ozil never got and considering how we're led to
believe the rich live with different rules to us -the mere peasants, it seems unusual until you understand it's all about
dividing, not emotional ethnic appreciation.
....................................
"The prisons in the US are packed with black and Mexican males" -is the usual cry and then quickly followed with the
statement that non-white men are being targeted and there's a disparity.
Ignoring the various reasons that include prisons don't exist at the bottom of every street and therefore, grouping
of inmates will assist a false reading or that statistics hold no symptom-evidence except as numbers, the answer
may lie in why there are more 'people-of-colour' incarcerated than white people.
Because they committed a crime.
That's an heinous comment to make -some of the rainbow-people may wail, but there's no stormtroopers banging
on Don Lemon's door at midnight because he's black and O. J. Simpson enjoyed an equittal and he's black...
so how does it make sense?
Individual circumstances. Don Lemon may be guilty of being a poor comedic-presenter, but that isn't a crime.
O.J got off because he had wealth and hired Johnnie Cochran, a powerful lawyer with a taste for bad ties.
Money talks and it holds no opinion on it's owner, something the rich don't want you to look at.
But that's another conversation for another time!
People's skin colour is being used to push an agenda and those who like to pet the sorry-looking Somalian
or the wide-eyed rug-carrying Moroccan because it makes them feel superior, are doing neither group a favour.
They're crossing the Med for your money, not your platitudes and in that rubber-dinghy, their different cultures
and basic perceptions come with them.
They don't rape you because you're white, they take you because you're weak.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.