Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Anti-Trump woman's march
#7
(01-28-2017, 02:44 PM)guohua Wrote: ...But what they fail to report is that Trumps Inauguration was on a Friday where as Obama's and
B. Clinton's was on the Weekend.
Well, SHIT, Most Of Trump Supporters Have JOB'S! Where as Obama's Didn't or Don't Now!

That's an important point that gets overlooked. When one stands back from the MSM Insult-Fest,
and look on the whole election, inauguration and Trump's administration's current decision-making,
the mainstream media haven't really adjusted to the accusations of journalistic bias.

But why...? Do they truly believe that a Presidential removal can take place in the USA that stems
from their constant negativity?!

If we believe that individual reporters are not involved in any conspiratorial agenda that directly involves
George Soros passing 'anti-Trump flavoured' articles to them and the reporting is mere fallout of 'going
-along-to-get-along' journalism that's required because of the struggle for ratings in a 24-hour news
world, then what could this be really be all about?

Personally, I think that the regular news outlets have been peddling trash and click-bait non-stories for
so long that a serious, fair-handed political piece is beyond them and they wish to continue in the puerile
'His-crowd-was-bigger-than-your-crowd' mentality for the simple reason is it's the general failure in
first-world Journalistic ethics.

Add to that, that with the many 'soft' University courses that smack of diversity and liberalism, there
are many would-be Journalists who've never understood their serious role and just see it as another
form of 'Twitter' where their opinions can be aired because of their personal belief-design.

The structure of 'the fourth estate' has changed radically due to the internet, but I also think that
broadcasting information -overall, has become a vehicle for more-personal opinions that are deliberately
shrouded within the format of the writings.

If a Reporter doesn't agree with a general view of a subject that they wish promoted positively, then a
narrative can be designed to 'convert' the reader over a number of articles that offer a reasonable -but
slanted, alternative.

It could well be that these Journalists have bowed to their media company's desires due to political
pressure being applied in the boardroom, but if true, I would suggest that it's done with only a mild
grudge.
Which in itself, his worth reporting!

Whether President Trump is correct or not about the mainstream media's treatment of his actions, I think
that what's really galling them is that he's demanding a higher conduct that they haven't aspired to since
the beginning of globalisation.
They've had their own way for a very long time and now that they've been 'outed'... they don't like it!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 


Messages In This Thread
Anti-Trump woman's march - by 727Sky - 01-22-2017, 09:42 AM
RE: Anti-Trump woman's march - by BIAD - 01-22-2017, 11:54 AM
RE: Anti-Trump woman's march - by Daitengu - 01-22-2017, 01:10 PM
RE: Anti-Trump woman's march - by 727Sky - 01-22-2017, 01:41 PM
RE: Anti-Trump woman's march - by 727Sky - 01-28-2017, 12:15 PM
RE: Anti-Trump woman's march - by guohua - 01-28-2017, 02:44 PM
RE: Anti-Trump woman's march - by BIAD - 01-29-2017, 12:26 PM
RE: Anti-Trump woman's march - by 727Sky - 02-11-2017, 06:23 AM
RE: Anti-Trump woman's march - by BIAD - 02-11-2017, 10:16 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)