10-24-2016, 07:12 AM
Per guohua's article...
First of all, my problem with these so-called polls is one, basing the votes of millions of Americans nationwide on a measly 874 total of folks that were polled.
And 2nd---out of the 879 people polled, how many picked were Dems versus how many Rep?
As stated above, the ratio is not quite equal.
No Siree, it leans more for the Dems which (((DUH))) is naturally going to give Hillary the bigger lead.
36% Dems polled.
27% Reps polled.
Seems off balanced to me, not even including the 31% Independent either.
Nor do they know how many are 'claiming' to be for Hillary, when in actuality, the are closet Trump supporters.
Hiding for fear of ridicule and backlash.
Dems can be pretty damn nasty and vile, per some of the hate filled comments I have read.
Quote:This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters.
Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats - Republicans - Independents."
First of all, my problem with these so-called polls is one, basing the votes of millions of Americans nationwide on a measly 874 total of folks that were polled.
And 2nd---out of the 879 people polled, how many picked were Dems versus how many Rep?
As stated above, the ratio is not quite equal.
No Siree, it leans more for the Dems which (((DUH))) is naturally going to give Hillary the bigger lead.
36% Dems polled.
27% Reps polled.
Seems off balanced to me, not even including the 31% Independent either.
Nor do they know how many are 'claiming' to be for Hillary, when in actuality, the are closet Trump supporters.
Hiding for fear of ridicule and backlash.
Dems can be pretty damn nasty and vile, per some of the hate filled comments I have read.