07-02-2016, 08:47 PM
It could well be that what we see as mystical is only a small part of a greater whole.
My anology was to purvey that time-travel might be connected to all the strange-stuff
we hear about and because we don't yet see the whole picture, we look on it in the
only rational manner that society accepts.
The sparrow saw a cave and a ghost-bird, we know it's a garage window and
a reflection. The magical world the sparrow lived in had a flip-side for myself and
I just looked at the scene in a more pragmatic way.
Since we don't know for sure what the absolute truth of reality is yet, we cannot
rule out that the strange phenomena witnessed isn't some-type of mis-identification
of a part of that absolute truth.
So are apparitions that some see, be a facet of a non-physical use of time-travel and
we just pigeon-hole it because of age-old religious beliefs?
As I suggested, physical movement doesn't seem a good idea when looking at
possible travelling around in the past and future. I would think that any 'butterfly effect'
of your physical presence could upset the past enough to make sure that your true
present-time period would never be found again.
Only a similar point in the present would be available.
In my own humble opinion, if my time-line changed, it was somewhere around 1973.
I have no evidence, just a feeling. And feelings are of no use in a laboratory.
My anology was to purvey that time-travel might be connected to all the strange-stuff
we hear about and because we don't yet see the whole picture, we look on it in the
only rational manner that society accepts.
The sparrow saw a cave and a ghost-bird, we know it's a garage window and
a reflection. The magical world the sparrow lived in had a flip-side for myself and
I just looked at the scene in a more pragmatic way.
Since we don't know for sure what the absolute truth of reality is yet, we cannot
rule out that the strange phenomena witnessed isn't some-type of mis-identification
of a part of that absolute truth.
So are apparitions that some see, be a facet of a non-physical use of time-travel and
we just pigeon-hole it because of age-old religious beliefs?
As I suggested, physical movement doesn't seem a good idea when looking at
possible travelling around in the past and future. I would think that any 'butterfly effect'
of your physical presence could upset the past enough to make sure that your true
present-time period would never be found again.
Only a similar point in the present would be available.
In my own humble opinion, if my time-line changed, it was somewhere around 1973.
I have no evidence, just a feeling. And feelings are of no use in a laboratory.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.