British Augmented Reality for Lawyers

[EndtheMadnessNow]

UK Lawyers with brain chip implants will be better, faster and cheaper

Lawyers could have electronic chips implanted in their brain in a revolutionary step that may cut legal costs and reduce the number of solicitors needed to work on complex cases, a report from the Law Society suggests.

Proponents of neurotechnology for lawyers have argued that corporate clients will press for the chips as an efficiency measure, which could result City solicitors, who routinely charge £1,500 an hour, switching to “billable units of attention”.

A report published last week by the Law Society, which represents solicitors in England and Wales, forecast that brain implants were likely to become the “iPhone of the future” in the legal profession.

No longer will teams of solicitors be required to pore over complicated merger contracts; one super-lawyer with an embedded chip will be able to scan years of precedents and acres of background material in a fraction of the time.

Rocketing hourly billing rates for legal advice is a perennial concern in the City. While multinational companies tend to write off the fees as the cost of doing business, a radical technological solution to reducing legal costs significantly would be attractive to chief executives and board directors.

The society’s report, [i]Neurotechnology, Law and the Legal Profession[/i], predicted that “lawyers might try to gain an advantage over competitors and try to stay ahead of increasingly capable artificial intelligence systems by using neurotechnology to improve their workplace performance”.

The report, by Allan McCay, a professor at the University of Sydney law school in Australia, added that the pressure to adopt the technology may come from clients. “One can imagine changes to billing that may be brought about by the attention-monitoring capacities of neurotechnologies. This might even prompt a move from billable hours to billable attention”.

McCay pointed out that the world’s wealthiest innovator, Elon Musk, has been investing in neurotechnology for the past eight years, and said: “This tech is coming, and we need to think about regulation.”

Richard Susskind, the lawyer turned author and legal profession futurist, said that widespread artificial intelligence would come first and some AI systems were already outperforming junior lawyers in certain tasks such as document reviewing. He added that “in the long run, we’ll all be digitally enhanced . . . The only question is whether that processing and storage is inside or outside our bodies.”

Kion Ahadi, the society’s director of strategy, acknowledged that implanting chips would raise concerns. “Any such fusion poses interesting and complex ethical and legal issues,” he said.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1561608534629965826


Albert Bourla: “Re-imagine the compliance!”




You can bet wealthy elite children will not be chipped like cattle.



Full article: WEF Augmented Reality




Cradle to Grave

[Brotherman]

What happens when opposing lawyers in court are synced up to the same thing? Does a mistrial happen or do deals between lawyers go down telepathically without the need for a judge or jury? 

Seriously like they shouldnt give this shit to lawyers they are greedy enough we should go back to the days of tying rocks to legs and chucking into water to find out if the lawyers sink or float like a duck before allowong them in court and shit.