A new study suggests that the world is already signed up for an apocalyptic rise in temperature.
Don’t believe it.
Source
Oh dear, battle of the experts now, where GW climate change is concerned.
Many people believe and understand the natural process Earth goes thru, it's climatic cycles over time.
But what many people are sick and tired of, is the fear mongering that goes along with the GW agenda. And many facts are being distorted to push this belief.
Along with nasty insults to those that may not go along with this perceived notion of it is 'all Man's fault, the planet is doomed' bullshit.
There are many news outlets tho that only cater to the global warming song & dance. They will not post articles such as this that contradicts their so-called data. Data that gets inputted into a computer by none other than humans. What better way to skew the results.
As weather data manipulation seems to be the norm to fit in with the GW scenario.
Climategate, the sequel: How we are STILL being tricked with flawed data on global warming
![[Image: 4ab593d5325c49a99fddc7778a99206f.png]](http://image.prntscr.com/image/4ab593d5325c49a99fddc7778a99206f.png)
Climate change itself is not the issue.
The Global warming agenda is.
Pretty bad now a days when 'science' cannot be trusted, being as money has managed to be the manipulator in many cases.
Facts be damned.
Oh, and no one is allowed to question GW.
That in of itself should raise all kinds of flags, especially when not all of the scientific community are in agreement of man-made GW.
Don’t believe it.
Quote:The world is getting warmer; we know this. But new claims suggesting that the temperature increase could be as high as 7 °C should be roundly ignored.
You may have already read about the study from which those numbers are drawn. Published in Nature, it suggests that the world is on course to experience warming in the next 1,000 years that’s beyond that of most conventional predictions. Keen to acknowledge the worst, some news outlets unquestioningly published the results, based solely upon Nature’s press release.
The research is impressive in some regards. It reconstructs the average surface temperature of Earth over the past two million years—far longer than the previous longest temperature record, which stretched back just 22,000 years (since about the end of the last Ice Age). That alone will be useful to climate scientists.
But the paper also uses its own data to estimate the sensitivity of Earth’s surface temperature to levels of carbon dioxide—and there it becomes unstuck. As Gizmodo points out, the research assumes that a historic correlation between global temperature and greenhouse-gas radiative forcing will hold in the future. The upshot is the suggestion that, based on today’s greenhouse-gas levels, a massive and unavoidable temperature rise of 3 to 7 °C will occur in the future.
But experts don’t think that’s valid.
Speaking to Ars Technica, Richard Alley from Penn State said the predictions made by the researchers represented “an upper limit, because we know that some of the temperature change was not caused by greenhouse gases.” Speaking to Gizmodo, Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, was more blunt, saying: “This is simply wrong.”
The take-home message: the world is getting warmer—but not that much warmer. Chill out, people.
Source
Oh dear, battle of the experts now, where GW climate change is concerned.
Many people believe and understand the natural process Earth goes thru, it's climatic cycles over time.
But what many people are sick and tired of, is the fear mongering that goes along with the GW agenda. And many facts are being distorted to push this belief.
Along with nasty insults to those that may not go along with this perceived notion of it is 'all Man's fault, the planet is doomed' bullshit.
There are many news outlets tho that only cater to the global warming song & dance. They will not post articles such as this that contradicts their so-called data. Data that gets inputted into a computer by none other than humans. What better way to skew the results.
As weather data manipulation seems to be the norm to fit in with the GW scenario.
Climategate, the sequel: How we are STILL being tricked with flawed data on global warming
Quote:But when Homewood was then able to check Giss’s figures against the original data from which they were derived, he found that they had been altered. Far from the new graph showing any rise, it showed temperatures in fact having declined over those 65 years by a full degree. When he did the same for the other two stations, he found the same. In each case, the original data showed not a rise but a decline.
Homewood had in fact uncovered yet another example of the thousands of pieces of evidence coming to light in recent years that show that something very odd has been going on with the temperature data relied on by the world's scientists. And in particular by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which has driven the greatest and most costly scare in history: the belief that the world is in the grip of an unprecedented warming.
Climate change itself is not the issue.
The Global warming agenda is.
Pretty bad now a days when 'science' cannot be trusted, being as money has managed to be the manipulator in many cases.
Facts be damned.
Oh, and no one is allowed to question GW.
That in of itself should raise all kinds of flags, especially when not all of the scientific community are in agreement of man-made GW.
