Military Doctor testifies in court that she was ordered to cover up & suppress huge a

[727Sky]

Dr. Theresa Long, a medical officer with the United States military, has testified in court that she was ordered by a superior to suppress Covid-19 vaccine injuries following the Biden regime’s mandate.
On March 10, Liberty Counsel, the law firm representing thirty members of the military who are fighting the military vaccine mandate, returned to federal court to defend the preliminary injunction Judge Steven Merryday granted two military plaintiffs that allowed them to skirt the military vaccine mandate. The Department of Defense (DoD) asked the judge to set aside the injunction while the case was on appeal.
Judge Merryday is a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
During the all-day hearing, Liberty Counsel presented compelling testimony from the Navy Commander of a surface warship and three military flight surgeons, Lt. Col. Peter Chambers, Lt. Col. Teresa Long and Col. (Ret.) Stewart Tankersley, M.D. In contrast, the DOD declined to present witnesses.
Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver said in an interview with the Blaze’s Daniel Horowitz on Monday that there have been three hearings now in this case, and the DoD has not yet offered a single witness. Instead of witnesses, the government “sends these declarations,” Staver explained. He said the judge has urged them to bring live witnesses to court so they can be cross examined, but they just refuse to do it. “So they send these declarations that some JAG attorney writes, and somebody in the military signs off on them.”
Staver said that the information the DoD has been presenting in court is “outdated, wrong, and would really be subject to dismantling under cross examination.” He added that cross examinations of his witnesses have only made their case stronger. “So they really don’t have anything to cross examine our witnesses with,” he said.
Staver told Horowitz that Judge Merryday has chastised the DoD lawyers during the hearings, telling them they have “a frail case,” and are “acting as though they are above the law.”
Dr. Theresa Long, a flight surgeon who holds a master’s degree in Public Health and is specially trained in the DMED, gave emotional testimony on March 10.
She and two other flight surgeons reviewed DMED last year and made some stunning discoveries about the high incidence of apparent vaccine injuries among members of the military.
According to the whistleblowers, certain disorders spiked after the vaccine mandate went into effect, including miscarriages and cancers, and neurological problems which increased by 1000 percent.
Dr. Long testified that she was contacted by high level officer the night before the hearing, and told not to discuss her findings regarding the explosive military medical data in court.  The whistleblower reportedly said she felt threatened after she tried to get her superiors to address the findings, “fearing for her life and for the safety of her children.”
Since the whistleblowers came forward with the DMED data, the DoD has thrown cold water on their conclusions, saying the increase in vaccine injuries was caused by a “glitch in the database.”
Politifact contacted Peter Graves, spokesperson for the Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Surveillance Division, who said the data for 2021 is correct, but for some reason, the data for the five years prior was inaccurate. Graves told PolitiFact by email that the division reviewed data in the DMED “and found that the data was incorrect for the years 2016-2020.”
In other words, for five straight years, the data was seriously corrupted and none of the DoD’s data analysts figured this out, and then it fixed itself on its own in 2021. The DoD has since put out new numbers showing more illnesses among the troops for the years prior to 2021.
Staver asked Long a question about the DMED data during the hearing, and she answered: “I have been ordered not to answer that question.”
Judge Merryday reportedly asked Long: “Ordered by who?,” and the doctor explained what happened the night before the hearing.
Staver then asked Long if the information the military ordered her to withhold was relevant and helpful for the court and the public to know. She said, “yes,” and Staver asked her why.
Long reportedly paused and choked back tears as she told the judge: “I have so many soldiers being destroyed by this vaccine. Not a single member of my senior command has discussed my concerns with me … I have nothing to gain and everything to lose by talking about it. I’m OK with that because I am watching people get absolutely destroyed.”
Dr. Long also testified that the data shows that deaths of military members from the vaccines exceed deaths from COVID itself.
Staver later told Horowitz that the DoD’s order for her not to discuss DMED amounted to witness tampering, especially since Long has whistleblower protections.
“They not only violated the Whistleblower Act, they potentially intimidated a witness and tried to change that witness’ testimony,” he said during the Conservative Review podcast on Monday.
The doctor said she is constantly contacted by people who have been injured by the genetic vaccines, and that many of those injured are pilots, who are expected to meet high fitness standards. Long told Staver that in just one afternoon she heard from four pilots who had just gotten MRIs back showing that they had myocarditis.
Morale is tanking in the military, she testified, with soldiers are in despair over the pressure to get the vaccine, and some are even having suicidal thoughts.
Long said she was aware of at least two people who have committed suicide over the pressure, and the threat of punishment for refusal.
She said the current regime’s policies are undermining “good order and discipline.”
In addition to Dr. Long, an unnamed Navy commander testified about his commander’s attempts to punish him for refusing the experimental injections.
On February 2, Judge Merryday issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Navy from punishing the Commander because of his vaccination status. Judge Merryday ruled the Navy violated the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
When the court ordered the Commodore to comply with the law, he filed an affidavit saying he had “lost confidence” in the Commander because the Commander had not taken the COVID shots.
The judge then entered a preliminary injunction, and the DOD and the Navy filed a motion asking the court to set aside his injunction, arguing that due to their “lost confidence” in the commander, his ship could not deploy.
However, at the time the ship was allegedly unable to be deployed, the commander was actually far out to sea testing the ship and training the crew.
While many Commanders fail to complete these operations timely, the Commander completed the mission early and the ship deemed “safe and ready.”
In a dramatic moment, the Commander said he should not have to be there in court defending religious freedom. “Generals and admirals should be here saying what I am saying today to uphold religious freedom. Our religious freedoms are being attacked.”
Also testifying last week was Dr. Pete Chambers, a Purple Heart recipient who is in the Texas National Guard defending the southern border where 10,000-20,000 illegal immigrants are flooding through every week. “My job is to keep our soldiers safe,” Chambers said.
Chambers was hoping to retire from the military in 2023 after nearly 40 years of service, but his adverse reaction to the Moderna shot derailed his plans.
Trusting the military that the shots are “safe and effective,” and not knowing at the time that aborted fetal cells were used in the testing and/or development, he took the shot. He now suffers from demyelination, a condition affecting the central nervous system caused by the injection.
After his Moderna injury, Dr. Chambers met Lt. Col. Long. They reviewed the DOD’s Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), the military equivalent to the federal government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), where he discovered other military members also developed a demyelination disease after the COVID shots.
Chambers, a military flight surgeon and one of only six Green Beret surgeons, was told that his job was to get soldiers to vaccinated. His superiors told him that religious exemptions would be automatically denied.  “Soldiers will try. Soldiers will fail,” this commanders said.
He pointed out that shots are not effective in preventing infection, and estimated that about 75-80% of soldiers getting infected are “double vaxxed” compared to only about 15% of soldiers who are not vaccinated.
Like Long, Chambers also testified that many soldiers are being injured by the COVID shots, and that “this is not normal.”
Dr. Stewart Tankersley, a flight surgeon who retired in September 2021 at the rank of Colonel, testified that the injections are neither safe nor effective.
Tankersley said he has personally treated over 200 COVID patients with no fatalities, and the group of doctors with whom he is associated has treated over 18,000 COVID patients with deaths only in the single digits.
“I’ve never seen anything like this in the military or civilian world, the lack of dialogue, the suppression of scientific dialogue.” Tankersley said on the stand.
Dr. Tankersley explained one of several reasons there are so many injuries from the COVID shots. The mRNA vaccines require a Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) as a delivery mechanism because the RNA quickly degrades without being encased in the LNP. The combination bypasses the natural immune system and creates inflammation that can inhibit the body’s innate immunity.
Dr. Tankersley testified that the shots are neither safe nor effective. He also testified that there are safe and effective treatments for COVID, including nasal rinsing and ivermectin.
Liberty Counsel argued that the DOD’s position that the only one way to combat COVID and ensure military readiness is to force the injections and kick out the unvaccinated is “untenable,” and that the mandate is undermining military readiness and harming morale.
Staver said: “I am honored to serve the brave men and women of the military. I am dismayed by the abuse and propaganda forced upon them from the White House and the Department of Defense. The truth will prevail, and freedom will win.”

---

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/25/milita...-injuries/

[727Sky]

Every year there is a Paris-Nice race which always marks the opening of the cycling season in the spring, This year the race had 154 participants but, only 59 managed to finish due to not feeling well.

Extreme wave of disease creates battlefield in platoon: 'Maybe a result of the vaccination'
Robin de BoerMarch 25, 2022 13:00
11116,0781 minute reading time
[/url]

Photo: Iljo Keisse during the Giro d'Italia in 2017 ( [url=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Giro_d%27Italia_2017,_keisse_gaviria_(34343445883).jpg?lightbox=off]filip bossuyt CC BY 2.0 )
Help us by sharing this information with your friends on your social network!

     

Italian cyclist Sonny Colbrelli collapsed on Monday after the first stage in the Tour of Catalonia, in which he finished second behind Australian Michael Matthews.
The European road champion and most recent winner of Paris-Roubaix received a chest compressions and was then taken to hospital. After the sprint Colbrelli was unconscious. He was transported to hospital in stable condition.
What happened to Colbrelli in Catalonia keeps the whole pack busy. There are many sick people. Tom Teulingkx, president of the Belgian Association of Sports and Examination Doctors (VSK), said: "We have regularly seen athletes with myo- and pericarditis in recent weeks."
Never experienced
When asked whether he has experienced the wave of illness that is now blowing through the peloton, Belgian cyclist Iljo Keisse from Quick Step-Alpha Vinyl answered : “Never, no never. Never experienced this extreme before.”
"A few sick people within the team, but now just teams that can only start with one man or even teams that arrive with no one, I've never seen that," said Keisse.
Battlefield
“How do you think that is, that battlefield?” was the next question.
"I have no idea, maybe because of those masks, that your immunity drops a bit and that you get infected very quickly, that's one possibility," Keisse replied. “It may be a lot worse than everyone thinks. It may also be a result of the vaccination . That could be. Nobody knows. Hopefully we will know soon.”



In november 2021 heeft het prestigieuze tijdschrift voor cardiologie, de Journal of the American Heart Association, een dringende waarschuwing uitgegeven over experimentele mRNA-vaccins: Abstract 10712: mRNA COVID vaccins verhogen drastisch de endotheliale ontstekingsmarkers en het risico op acuut coronair syndroom (ACS), zoals gemeten met de PULS harttest: een waarschuwing.
Wij concluderen dat de mRNA-vaccins de endotheelontsteking en de T-celinfiltratie van het myocard drastisch doen toenemen en de oorzaak kunnen zijn van verhoogde trombose, cardiomyopathieën en andere vasculaire gebeurtenissen.
Opmerking: dit is de meest voor de hand liggende verklaring voor de dramatische toename van instortingen in top- en amateursporten, want het is bekend dat hartspierontsteking en trombose bijzonder gevaarlijk zijn voor sporters, schrijft Jan Walter.

https://www.ninefornews.nl/extreme-ziekt...accinatie/
https://www.frontnieuws.com/verbijsterin...rijs-nice/

More on the race https://www.cyclingnews.com/paris-nice/ Maybe no connection with the jabb but interesting one way or the other.

[Snarl]

When you see stuff like this ... a senior officer testifying 'in court/under oath' ... 

You should very harshly judge the government who put the whole thing in motion.

Buck stops at Trump's feet.  He was the President.  He said he was gonna put Hillary in jail ... and never lifted a finger.  He infringed on the right to keep and bear arms with his silly bump-stock decision.  And ... he declared a National Emergency which he let Joe Biden's administration inherit.

I'll be the first to admit there were some very scary things popping up on the Internet when the whole plannedemic cooked-off.  Things I _know_ could have gotten out of a bio-lab.  Everything in my mind stopped when the Policy of Retaliation wasn't applied.  I guess we just weren't ready to nuke China off the face of the Earth.  That, or it wasn't really China who was at fault.

These vaccines (not vaccines) though?  Operation Warp Speed?  Lockdowns and BLM/ANTIFA activities that took out small businesses.  This new supply shortage and closely followed by sanctions that block imports of fertilizer.  Bill Gates buying up so much farmland that he's now the largest owner of farmland in America.

All of it's adding up to something.  One or two little voices coming out of the medical community?  It needs to be more.  They need an amplifier ... that's it!!

[727Sky]

https://lists.youmaker.com/links/idRHUbK...41Iy0OurgV

Heart Issues Detected Months After COVID-19 Vaccination: Study
By Zachary Stieber
March 27, 2022 Updated: March 28, 2022
biggersmaller
Print
Heart abnormalities were detected in some adolescents months after COVID-19 vaccination, according to a study.
Researchers at Seattle Children’s Hospital reviewed cases of patients younger than 18 who went to the hospital with chest pain and elevated serum troponin levels, two key markers of heart inflammation, within a week of getting a second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
While 35 patients fit the criteria, 19 were excluded for various reasons, including receiving care in another state after the initial visit. Cardiac imaging of the remaining 16 patients, performed three to eight months after they were first examined, showed 11 had persistent late gadolinium enhancement, a heart abnormality, though at lower levels than months earlier.
The follow-up imaging also revealed abnormal global longitudinal strain, a measure of heart function, in three-quarters of the patients, with little change from the initial examinations, as well as “significantly improved” measures of blood pumping and no detected regional wall motion issues, another abnormality.
Researchers said that while symptoms “were transient and most patients appeared to respond to treatment,” the study showed a “persistence of abnormal findings,” noting that late gadolinium enhancement is known as an indicator of heart injury and is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with typical myocarditis.
The findings “rais[e] concerns for potential longer-term effects,” they wrote, adding that they plan to repeat imaging at one year after the vaccine to assess whether problems are still present.

The findings were published following peer review in The Journal of Pediatrics. The researchers said no funding was received for the paper.
Pfizer and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) didn’t respond by press time to requests for comment.
Dr. Anish Koka, a cardiologist who wasn’t involved with the study, said it suggests that 60 to 70 percent of teenagers who get myocarditis from a COVID-19 vaccine may be left with a scar in their heart.
“Certainly, children who had chest pain severe enough to merit seeking medical attention need to at least make sure they get a follow up MRI,” he told The Epoch Times in a message on Twitter, adding that the findings “should have clear implications for the discussion around vaccines, especially for high risk male teenagers … and definitely for vaccine mandates.”
The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, both built on messenger RNA technology, have been linked with several forms of heart inflammation, including myocarditis and pericarditis, according to data from multiple countries.

The conditions have been seen at much higher than expected rates in youths, especially young men, according to data reported to the CDC. The most at-risk group is 16- and 17-year-old males, who have reported rates of 69 per million after second doses of Pfizer’s two-dose primary series in the United States. The problems are likely underreported.

The heart inflammation often leaves people short of breath, with chest pain and other symptoms. Many patients are admitted to the hospital, and a small number of deaths have been reported.
A survey conducted among some of the youth whose conditions were reported to the CDC at least 90 days after they first experienced symptoms found that about half were still suffering from at least one symptom, such as chest pain.
About 4 in 10 patients were still on exercise restrictions months after experiencing the inflammation, a parallel survey with the patients’ health care providers found.
Providers also disclosed that cardiac imaging done months after symptoms appeared still showed abnormalities for some patients, with late gadolinium enhancement being the most frequent.

[ABNARTY]

It all depends if the moo-cows and sheepes are told this is something worth getting hysterical about. Who will be the boogey man then?

If TPTB can get away with this, what can't they get away with? 

I salute that officer for coming forward but just one? What pressure must exist for silence otherwise?

[Michigan Swamp Buck]

In situations like this, I ask myself three questions as follows.

• What should I do?
  A moral and ethical question that will require a personal judgement.
• What can I do?
  What is actually possible for me to do and will it make a difference?
• What will I do?
  What is the most likely action I will have if I haven't acted already?

Once you have settled these questions in your mind you must make a decision to act or not. This is a fluid situation and these questions will need to be updated frequently as things change, so the decision to act will also change going forward.

[Snarl]

In situations like this, I ask myself three questions as follows.

• What should I do?
  A moral and ethical question that will require a personal judgement.
  
• What can I do?
  What is actually possible for me to do and will it make a difference?
  
• What will I do?
  What is the most likely action I will have if I haven't acted already?
  

Once you have settled these questions in your mind you must make a decision to act or not. This is a fluid situation and these questions will need to be updated frequently as things change, so the decision to act will also change going forward.

I assume your note above was an indirect reply to @"ABNARTY" 

What pressure must exist for silence otherwise?

By and large, if you're not affected, the shots they stuck in us are a distant concern.  If you're not thinking about it very much, you're probably not going to take any action at all.  I think that may be why there aren't a lot of folks coming forward to express their grave concerns.
The guy from the OP however, is another flight surgeon for the Air Force (if memory serves).  There was some other female officer from the Army too as I recall. Can you imagine the effects of disqualifying certified military pilots from flying?  Can you imagine (if that happened) people being screened out of ever taking any flight controls into their hands?  Was that maybe the whole point of the news release?

[Michigan Swamp Buck]

In situations like this, I ask myself three questions as follows.

• What should I do?
  A moral and ethical question that will require a personal judgement.
  
• What can I do?
  What is actually possible for me to do and will it make a difference?
  
• What will I do?
  What is the most likely action I will have if I haven't acted already?
  

Once you have settled these questions in your mind you must make a decision to act or not. This is a fluid situation and these questions will need to be updated frequently as things change, so the decision to act will also change going forward.

I assume your note above was an indirect reply to @"ABNARTY" 

What pressure must exist for silence otherwise?

By and large, if you're not affected, the shots they stuck in us are a distant concern.  If you're not thinking about it very much, you're probably not going to take any action at all.  I think that may be why there aren't a lot of folks coming forward to express their grave concerns.
The guy from the OP however, is another flight surgeon for the Air Force (if memory serves).  There was some other female officer from the Army too as I recall. Can you imagine the effects of disqualifying certified military pilots from flying?  Can you imagine (if that happened) people being screened out of ever taking any flight controls into their hands?  Was that maybe the whole point of the news release?

I was thinking along the line of "what if" I were in the position to be the whistle blower. Of course that same line of questions can be applied to most any decision we make.

When it comes down hard on someone, you will go through those questions and come to a decision very quickly without too much thought (it would for me).

[beez]

Sadly, this will go nowhere. 

Speaking out against the vax will be considered seditious. 

[ABNARTY]

In situations like this, I ask myself three questions as follows.

• What should I do?
  A moral and ethical question that will require a personal judgement.
  
• What can I do?
  What is actually possible for me to do and will it make a difference?
  
• What will I do?
  What is the most likely action I will have if I haven't acted already?
  

Once you have settled these questions in your mind you must make a decision to act or not. This is a fluid situation and these questions will need to be updated frequently as things change, so the decision to act will also change going forward.

IMHO, that's a big one in this situation. If you voice your concerns and push too hard, you will be replaced by someone who does not give a damn either way. 

You are no longer in a position to do anything positive then.

Or do you tone down your protests to where you are still viable? Wait for a better opportunity to turn up the heat. Do not alienate those who may prove useful down the road. 

Of course if you feel there are serious medical risks to those in your care from a certain action, waiting may not be an option. So you do what's right, take the "L", and move on.

Her story might make a good read someday.

[ABNARTY]

In situations like this, I ask myself three questions as follows.

• What should I do?
  A moral and ethical question that will require a personal judgement.
  
• What can I do?
  What is actually possible for me to do and will it make a difference?
  
• What will I do?
  What is the most likely action I will have if I haven't acted already?
  

Once you have settled these questions in your mind you must make a decision to act or not. This is a fluid situation and these questions will need to be updated frequently as things change, so the decision to act will also change going forward.

I assume your note above was an indirect reply to @"ABNARTY" 

What pressure must exist for silence otherwise?

By and large, if you're not affected, the shots they stuck in us are a distant concern.  If you're not thinking about it very much, you're probably not going to take any action at all.  I think that may be why there aren't a lot of folks coming forward to express their grave concerns.
The guy from the OP however, is another flight surgeon for the Air Force (if memory serves).  There was some other female officer from the Army too as I recall. Can you imagine the effects of disqualifying certified military pilots from flying?  Can you imagine (if that happened) people being screened out of ever taking any flight controls into their hands?  Was that maybe the whole point of the news release?

Maybe you get a lot of young folks who see it as just another shot you need to get. One of a zillion. It is not a significant life event. 1SG told me to get this shot, so here I am. 

With regards to flight status, that would get some attention. And not the kind you want regardless of how moral or just it may be. 

But that's how these things go. They kicked down the road a long way. Think agent orange, Gulf War syndrome, burn pits, etc. The Pentagon will fight tooth and nail to avoid these issues. They do not make good evaluation report bullets.

[Snarl]

• What should I do? What can I do? 
  
• What is actually possible for me to do and will it make a difference?
  
• What will I do?
  

I assume your note above was an indirect reply to @"ABNARTY" 

What pressure must exist for silence otherwise?

if you're not affected, the shots they stuck in us are a distant concern.

Maybe you get a lot of young folks who see it as just another shot you need to get.

For most, I believe that's the long and short of it.

If we've all got burn-pit syndrome now ... we're mostly all in it together.  I'd hate to be one of the guys who avoided the shot trying to live on an Earth covered in rotting corpses. Wonder who thinks, "Whew ... avoided that!!" but failed to consider the 2d and 3d order effects of everyone keeling over all around them.

Survive an apocalypse?  Not on my bucket list, Brother.