June 2021 Classified UAP / UFO Report Given to Congress Partially Released

[Gortex]

John Greenewald has obtained some of the files that weren't included in the public release of the report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena given to Congress in June of 2021.

With a small triumph in the effort to get transparency on a hot topic issue, The Black Vault has secured the partial release of the classified report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) given to Congress in June of 2021.
This effort by The Black Vault is the result of a Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) case filed under 32 CFR § 1704 (not the usual Freedom of Information Act [FOIA] cases generally filed under 5 U.S.C. § 552) less than 24 hours after the public version of the same was released.
The case mandated that the the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), in conjunction with ALL agencies and military branches that contributed to the report, review their respective contributions, and in the end, release the unclassified/declassified/non-exempt portions
https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/june-2021-classified-uap-ufo-report-given-to-congress-partially-released/

As is the way at the Black vault the files are available for download at the link above.

John is also doing a live stream on the contents in just over an hour.

[Snarl]

John is also doing a live stream on the contents in just over an hour.

Thanks for the heads-up, Gortex!!

[guohua]

@"Gortex" 
Thanks, we have 10 more minutes 

[Gortex]

As expected the files given to Congress were heavily redacted upon release to the public but John has said he will appeal some of the redaction's , like why was the shape of a reported UAP redacted , as seen here at 30.30 on the video.

Unless the redacted part is "disk shaped".

[guohua]

Yes, good question, Why was the shape redacted, because of the 2001 and 2002 revelation of Gary McKinnon.
He did hack into the the Military and NASA computers and then release pictures of our Secret Space Force Fleet.

From Reagan's Diary

April 13, the National Archive Records Administration made available almost 250,000 pages of documents from President Reagan's administration. It will take several months for researchers to read through the documents. The released material may yield insight into a curious comment found in President Reagan's Diary. The entry for Tuesday, June 11, 1985 (page 334) reads:

-Lunch with 5 top space scientist. It was fascinating. Space truly is the last frontier and some of the developments there in astronomy etc. are like science fiction, except they are real. I learned that our shuttle capacity is such that we could orbit 300 people.

Finally, the idea of a secret space fleet using advanced technologies was boosted by a British hacker, Gary McKinnon, who faces extradition to the U.S. for hacking into U.S. government and military computers. McKinnon claims that he came across secret Pentagon and NASA files that contained a list of 'non-terrestrial officers', and a spreadsheet detailing 'fleet-to-fleet transfers'. Could the tall being depicted with the two Space Shuttle astronauts actually belong to a group of "non-terrestrial officers" that periodically give assistance to Space Shuttle programs through the US Air Force's Space Command?

Based on the available evidence from a range of sources, President Reagan's 1985 Diary entry is a frank acknowledgement of a classified space program that can transport and accomodate hundreds of astronauts.

The Diary entry suggests he received one or more briefings on the topic. Important clues may emerge from the recently released Reagan records about Strategic Command's classified space fleet. More significantly, the public may soon learn about the advanced antigravity technologies that have been secretly developed and used for decades to fly military astronauts into deep space.

[Wizzz]

As expected the files given to Congress were heavily redacted upon release to the public but John has said he will appeal some of the redaction's , like why was the shape of a reported UAP redacted , as seen here at 30.30 on the video.

Unless the redacted part is "disk shaped".

In my mind, the only way redacting the shape makes sense is if it was a black project of ours and
the shape was a give-away. But, that begs the question: why would it make it's way into the report to begin with.
I love this stuff but for every potential answer, 6 more questions pop up. It's like logic puzzle whack-a-mole.
Just my 2 cents.