Quote:All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg. *** Through its Young Global Leaders program, the World Economic Forum has been instrumental in shaping a world order that undermines all democratic principles. For several decades, this program has nurtured compliant leaders acting as WEF agents in governments around the world. The consequences are far-reaching and may turn out to be devastating for humanity.
I have to say then I mention names like Mrs Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on they all have been Young Global Leaders of The World Economic Forum. But what we are really proud of now with the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, is that we penetrate the cabinets… It is true in Argentina and it is true in France now… (Klaus Schwab) Click here or image to access Video
In 1992, Klaus Schwab and World Economic Forum launched a program initially called Global Leaders of Tomorrow.
In 2004, this program was turned into the Forum for Young Global Leaders (which I cover in my book The Global Coup D’Etat) – a 5-year program of indoctrination into WEFs principles and goals. The aim was – and is – to find suitable future leaders for the emerging global society. The program has since its inception has included politicians, business leaders, royalty, journalists, performers and other cultural influencers who have excelled in their fields but have not yet turned 40 years of age (originally 43 in order to include Angela Merkel). It has since grown into an extensive global network of dedicated leaders with enormous resources and influence, all working to implement the technocratic plans of the World Economic Forum in their respective nations and fields.
The network creates a force for worldwide influence through the combination of the individual skills and resources of its members.
As Klaus Schwab says in the introductory quote, it has become very successful.
Already in the first year, 1992, a number of highly influential candidates were elected. Among 200 selected were global profiles such as Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Nicolas Sarkozy, Bill Gates, Bono, Richard Branson (Virgin), Jorma Ollila (Shell Oil), and José Manuel Barroso (President of the European Commission 2004–2014).[1] More examples of influential Young Global Leaders [2]:
Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden
Crown Prince Haakon of Norway
Crown Prince Fredrik of Denmark
Prince [b]Jaime de Bourbon de Parme[/b], Netherlands
Princess Reema Bint Bandar Al-Saud, Ambassador for Saudi-Arabia in USA Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister, New Zeeland Alexander De Croo, Prime Minister, Belgium Emmanuel Macron, President, France Sanna Marin, Prime Minister, Finland Carlos Alvarado Quesada, President, Costa Rica Faisal Alibrahim, Minister of Economy and Planning, Saudi Arabia Shauna Aminath, Minister of Environment, Climate Change and Technology, Maldives Ida Auken, MP, former Minister of Environment, Denmark (author to the infamous article “Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better”) Annalena Baerbock, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Leader of Alliance 90/Die Grünen, Germany Kamissa Camara, Minister of the Digital Economy and Planning, Mali Ugyen Dorji, Minister of Domestic Affairs, Bhutan Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Canada Martín Guzmán, Minister of Finance, Argentina Muhammad Hammad Azhar, Minister of Energy, Pakistan Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information and communications technology and Innovation, Rwanda Ronald Lamola, Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, South Africa Birgitta Ohlson, Minister for European Union Affairs 2010–2014, Sweden Mona Sahlin, Party Leader of the Social Democrats 2007–2011, Sweden Stav Shaffir, Leader of the Green Party, Israel Vera Daves de Sousa, Minister of Finance, Angola Leonardo Di Caprio, actor and Climate Activist Mattias Klum, photographer and Environmentalist Jack Ma, Founder of Alibaba Larry Page, Founder of Google Ricken Patel, Founder of Avaaz David de Rothschild, adventurer and Environmentalist Jimmy Wale, Founder of Wikipedia
Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman of Investor Niklas Zennström, Founder of Skype Mark Zuckerberg, Founder of Facebook
The purpose from the beginning has been to “identify and advance a future-oriented global agenda, focusing on issues at the intersection of the public and private sectors.”
Public–Private Partnerships is one of the cornerstones of the World Economic Forum philosophy. That is, a merger between state and large companies (also known as corporativism) with the aim of solving global problems of in a more “effective” way. The choice of leaders clearly reflects this aspiration. The Young Global Leaders group was initially instructed to identify the major challenges of the 21st century. These included peace, the environment, education, technology and health – areas which these upcoming leaders could exploit politically, economically, and culturally in the new millennium.
Partners for Global Leaders of Tomorrow in 2000 were large global companies such as The Coca Cola Company, Ernst & Young, Volkswagen, and BP Amoco. These could contribute to the agenda by “playing an active role in developing and implementing the concept of the GLT project. The partners can therefore actively participate in the development of GLT programs; representatives of the partner companies as well as their guests are invited to GLT meetings .. ”Since the Global Leaders of Tomorrow was turned into Young Global Leaders 2004, partners such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, and JPMorganChase (with alumni from the program) have also participated as sponsors.
The ultimate consequence of both public–private partnerships and these target areas is the creation of a largely tyrannical social contract in which the individual has become subordinated to these powerful interests. Noble goals of creating a better world have also been kidnapped. This is especially evident in the context of the partnership between the WEF and the UN and the implementation of the global goals (Agenda 2030) through the application of the technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This means that the democratic principles and division of power of the 20th century have largely been completely undermined and instead replaced by a new global class that shapes our common future based on their own interests.
This has led to a de facto privatisation of both national governments and international organisations, where lobbyists are no longer kept in the lobby but have moved into the seat of power, shaping policies directly affecting our lives. What this means has become particularly evident since the pandemic was declared in March 2020. In addition, leading multinational investment management corporations such as BlackRock, led by the World Economic Forum’s own Larry Fink, have constantly moved their positions forward.
German economist and journalist Ernst Wolff believes that many of the national leaders included in the Young Global Leader program have been selected for their willingness to carry out the tough agenda of lockdowns in recent years without asking any questions, and that their impending failure (as evidenced by in a growing dissatisfaction of the masses) will be used as an excuse to create a new form of Global Government where the old nation states become largely obsolete. A new global digital currency with Universal Basic Income (UBI) can then be gradually introduced to replace our doomed monetary system.[3] This conclusion partly coincides with my own.
It is also supported by Paul Raskin‘s scenarios from The Great Transition Initiative on how a totalitarian “New Earth Order” is established, to be replaced in the long run by a global democratic government (Earth Federation) with a World Constitution.[4]
Quote:The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the catastrophic failure of an every-country-for-itself approach to public health, and national economic interests, rather than global needs, continue to dominate discussions of climate policy, paving the path toward climate chaos.
Under the tricameral World Parliament come the four main agencies of the Earth Federation government: the World Supreme Court system, the World Executive, the World Enforcement System, and the World Ombudsman.[5]
Glen T. Martin, The Great Transition Requires the Earth Constitution
The vision is that a peaceful and harmonious world in balance is created through the establishment of a World Federation with a World Parliament, World Government and a World Court. These are ideas that have long circulated in Club of Rome and closely connected New Age circles.
The question is how such a new global system of power would escape the fate of being kidnapped by the same interests that created our current corrupt and failing system?
This is in view of those who support projects such as The Great Transition (initiated with start-up capital from Steven Rockefeller). What is happening is rather a method of taking us to their ultimate solution in the form of a global technocratic control system.
However, it is highly unlikely that this plan will succeed. Awareness is spreading like wildfire and the panic of the elite increases as their narrative crumbles and people become more and more immune to the propaganda. Hence all the inquisitors and “fact checkers” who diligently gatekeep the narrative and help steer public opinion in the “right” direction. They are surely to be trusted since, for example, David Roy Thomson, Chairman of the Thomson Reuters Corporation, is an alumni of Global Leaders of Tomorrow, class of 1993. It is now time to take control of our own destinies and to avoid falling into new traps.
02-11-2022, 08:13 PM (This post was last modified: 02-11-2022, 08:14 PM by BIAD.)
They may laugh at Alex Jones and David Icke's suggestion that evil Lizard-people are ruling the globe and
seeking world domination, but take away the scaly skin, flying saucers and eating kids, it's still the same.
There has been ideological subversion program run for many decades , by those same scumbags and their predecessors. The plan is to change everything and make a lot struggle
02-12-2022, 10:35 PM (This post was last modified: 02-12-2022, 10:42 PM by Ninurta.)
I read this very strange post written by a WEF alumnus in her efforts to explain the "own nothing and be happy" philosophy. As explanations go, it was a miserable failure.
According to her, you will "own" nothing, but be able to have anything delivered to you to "borrow" on demand. Everything is allegedly "free" as well. She does not, however, go into any sort of detail on just who is paying for all this "free" stuff, or who is delivering it to your door, or picking it back up when you are finished using it.
You do not even own your own living or sleeping space - any space in your quarters you are not using is subject to takeover by strangers. She mentions that, for example, her living room might be used for business meetings when she is not busy living in it.
She mentions the "free' stuff starting out as "services", sort of like what some companies are doing now - except they are charging for it, rather than giving it away free. "Software as a service" is a model that companies like Adobe have embraced, where you no longer have a copy of the software, it resides "in the cloud", and that is also where you have to use it, and store whatever you create with it. Miss a monthly payment, and POOF! no more access. Microsoft is another company dabbling with "software as a service", having taken to keeping Office, for example, "in the cloud", and charging monthly fees for access thereto. They had quietly intended to move Windows 10 in that same direction, such that your operating system was a "service" in the cloud with a monthly fee to use your computer, payable to Microsoft, but something appears to have gone haywire with that scheme. I say that because they are now coming out with Windows 11, and Win10 never got moved to "the cloud".
Microsoft initially said that Windows 10 would be the last version of Windows, undergoing constant forced updates to maintain currency, but never changing it's name. I guess something went haywire with that plan, too.
So the emerging concept is that you will neither "own" anything, nor have any actual possessions - not even the clothes on your back. Everything is to be a "service", and up for grabs to strangers. I believe it was Janis Joplin who crooned "freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose", and they seem to have taken that notion literally, and to heart.
And no mention, anywhere I could see in the article, of who is to pay for these "services", or how they are to be paid for.
All in all, it sounds a lot like the life of a farm animal - nothing and nowhere is "yours", everything is provided to you by a mysterious master or "farmer"... and also no mention of what the purpose of that is, or the end game. For farm animals, the purpose and end game usually involves a guest appearance on the farmer's dinner table...
Never look a gift horse in the mouth, because you are not likely to like what you find - no one is going to just give you everything for nothing. There is always a price to be paid, and you may not like the price you will be charged for all this "free" stuff. I just have no idea what that price would be, and they aren't telling.
"Owning nothing and being happy" is the life of livestock, not human beings. Don't be livestock.
She does, however, mention near the end of the article how bad she feels for those allowed to exist out in the hinterlands, living as free men always have lived, without the free bedding and grain, so there is that potential. Apparently only the cities are to be fenced in and provided for. Us barbarians out beyond civilization will be allowed to retain our freedom... so long as we don't dare to exercise it, I suppose.
This is their goal for 2030 - just 8 short years from now.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
There has been ideological subversion program run for many decades , by those same scumbags and their predecessors. The plan is to change everything and make a lot struggle
I agree. It sounds like a bunch of nonsense in order to cover up what it really is.
Oh, and I'm sure those powerful elites will also relinquish all their possessions too. When they are not using one of their houses, anybody can just come in and hang out. And there is no way any of this could go south. You give up everything and become 100% dependent on this new, magical system.
(02-12-2022, 10:35 PM)Ninurta Wrote: I read this very strange post written by a WEF alumnus in her efforts to explain the "own nothing and be happy" philosophy. As explanations go, it was a miserable failure.
According to her, you will "own" nothing, but be able to have anything delivered to you to "borrow" on demand. Everything is allegedly "free" as well. She does not, however, go into any sort of detail on just who is paying for all this "free" stuff, or who is delivering it to your door, or picking it back up when you are finished using it.
You do not even own your own living or sleeping space - any space in your quarters you are not using is subject to takeover by strangers. She mentions that, for example, her living room might be used for business meetings when she is not busy living in it.
She mentions the "free' stuff starting out as "services", sort of like what some companies are doing now - except they are charging for it, rather than giving it away free. "Software as a service" is a model that companies like Adobe have embraced, where you no longer have a copy of the software, it resides "in the cloud", and that is also where you have to use it, and store whatever you create with it. Miss a monthly payment, and POOF! no more access. Microsoft is another company dabbling with "software as a service", having taken to keeping Office, for example, "in the cloud", and charging monthly fees for access thereto. They had quietly intended to move Windows 10 in that same direction, such that your operating system was a "service" in the cloud with a monthly fee to use your computer, payable to Microsoft, but something appears to have gone haywire with that scheme. I say that because they are now coming out with Windows 11, and Win10 never got moved to "the cloud".
Microsoft initially said that Windows 10 would be the last version of Windows, undergoing constant forced updates to maintain currency, but never changing it's name. I guess something went haywire with that plan, too.
So the emerging concept is that you will neither "own" anything, nor have any actual possessions - not even the clothes on your back. Everything is to be a "service", and up for grabs to strangers. I believe it was Janis Joplin who crooned "freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose", and they seem to have taken that notion literally, and to heart.
And no mention, anywhere I could see in the article, of who is to pay for these "services", or how they are to be paid for.
All in all, it sounds a lot like the life of a farm animal - nothing and nowhere is "yours", everything is provided to you by a mysterious master or "farmer"... and also no mention of what the purpose of that is, or the end game. For farm animals, the purpose and end game usually involves a guest appearance on the farmer's dinner table...
Never look a gift horse in the mouth, because you are not likely to like what you find - no one is going to just give you everything for nothing. There is always a price to be paid, and you may not like the price you will be charged for all this "free" stuff. I just have no idea what that price would be, and they aren't telling.
"Owning nothing and being happy" is the life of livestock, not human beings. Don't be livestock.
She does, however, mention near the end of the article how bad she feels for those allowed to exist out in the hinterlands, living as free men always have lived, without the free bedding and grain, so there is that potential. Apparently only the cities are to be fenced in and provided for. Us barbarians out beyond civilization will be allowed to retain our freedom... so long as we don't dare to exercise it, I suppose.
This is their goal for 2030 - just 8 short years from now.
.
I am concerned like you. Even more so because I know people who would rush to this in a heartbeat just to demonstrate how woke they are.
Maybe that's what it is supposed to do. Cull the bed wetters.
While I have no idea, I will live far out in the hinterlands to see what happens. I'm sure I will be part of Phase II but we'll cross that bridge when we get there.
Where oh where is the Man from UNCLE when we need him? Oh yeah ... he worked for the UN
Klaus Schwab:
Quote:You die hard, Mr. Deplorable ...
Cheers
Once upon a time, I wanted to join U.N.C.L.E. - but then I realized how uncomfortable it would be to try hiding a communications transmitter in the heel of a moccasin!
Still, I got my own Agent 99 anyhow. A man has to have dreams!
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
(02-13-2022, 02:58 PM)ABNARTY Wrote: I am concerned like you. Even more so because I know people who would rush to this in a heartbeat just to demonstrate how woke they are.
Maybe that's what it is supposed to do. Cull the bed wetters.
While I have no idea, I will live far out in the hinterlands to see what happens. I'm sure I will be part of Phase II but we'll cross that bridge when we get there.
What puzzles me is what do they expect to get, what profit, from a people whom they allow to have nothing but what they are given? I know what is expected from farm animals...
... and slaves.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Quote:World Economic Forum’s ‘Young Global Leaders’ Is A Massive Network Of Royals, Politicians, Big Tech, Billionaires And Other ‘Elites’
Humans Are Free Through its Young Global Leaders program, the World Economic Forum has been instrumental in shaping a world order that undermines all democratic principles. For several decades, this program has nurtured compliant leaders acting as WEF agents in governments around the world. The consequences are far-reaching and may turn out to be devastating for humanity.
Billy Boy (Global Leader of Tomorrow 1992) and Justin Trudeau (Young Global Leader). “I have to say then I mention names like Mrs Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on they all have been Young Global Leaders of The World Economic Forum. But what we are really proud of now with the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, is that we penetrate the cabinets… It is true in Argentina and it is true in France now…” – Klaus Schwab Watch below:
In 1992, Klaus Schwab and World Economic Forum launched a program initially called Global Leaders of Tomorrow. In 2004, this program was turned into the Forum for Young Global Leaders (which I cover in my book The Global Coup D’Etat) – a 5-year program of indoctrination into WEFs principles and goals.
The aim was – and is – to find suitable future leaders for the emerging global society. The program has since its inception has included politicians, business leaders, royalty, journalists, performers and other cultural influencers who have excelled in their fields but have not yet turned 40 years of age (originally 43 in order to include Angela Merkel).
It has since grown into an extensive global network of dedicated leaders with enormous resources and influence, all working to implement the technocratic plans of the World Economic Forum in their respective nations and fields. “The network creates a force for worldwide influence through the combination of the individual skills and resources of its members.”
As Klaus Schwab says in the introductory quote, it has become very successful. Already in the first year, 1992, a number of highly influential candidates were elected. Among 200 selected were global profiles such as Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Nicolas Sarkozy, Billy Boy, Bono, Richard Branson (Virgin), Jorma Ollila (Shell Oil), and José Manuel Barroso (President of the European Commission 2004–2014). [1]
Another “Global Leader of Tomorrow” 2000 was Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of Canada, a journalist and author who was previously managing director of Thomson Reuters and deputy editor of the Financial Times. She is also a board member of the World Economic Forum.
“As Foreign Minister, she led and successfully concluded the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. In November, 2019, Ms. Freeland was appointed Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. In this capacity, she led Canada’s united response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” (World Economic Forum) [2]
More Examples Of Influential Young Global Leaders [3]:
Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden Crown Prince Haakon of Norway Crown Prince Fredrik of Denmark
Prince [b]Jaime de Bourbon de Parme[/b], Netherlands PrincessReema Bint Bandar Al-Saud, Ambassador for Saudi-Arabia in USA Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister, New Zeeland Alexander De Croo, Prime Minister, Belgium Emmanuel Macron, President, France Sanna Marin, Prime Minister, Finland Carlos Alvarado Quesada, President, Costa Rica Faisal Alibrahim, Minister of Economy and Planning, Saudi Arabia Shauna Aminath, Minister of Environment, Climate Change and Technology, Maldives Ida Auken, MP, former Minister of Environment, Denmark (author to the infamous article “Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better”) Annalena Baerbock, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Leader of Alliance 90/Die Grünen, Germany Kamissa Camara, Minister of the Digital Economy and Planning, Mali Ugyen Dorji, Minister of Domestic Affairs, Bhutan Martín Guzmán, Minister of Finance, Argentina Muhammad Hammad Azhar, Minister of Energy, Pakistan Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information and communications technology and Innovation, Rwanda Ronald Lamola, Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, South Africa Birgitta Ohlson, Minister for European Union Affairs 2010–2014, Sweden Mona Sahlin, Party Leader of the Social Democrats 2007–2011, Sweden Stav Shaffir, Leader of the Green Party, Israel Vera Daves de Sousa, Minister of Finance, Angola Leonardo Di Caprio, actor and Climate Activist Mattias Klum, photographer and Environmentalist, Sweden Jack Ma, Founder of Alibaba Larry Page, Founder of Google Ricken Patel, Founder of Avaaz Jimmy Wale, Founder of Wikipedia
Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman of Investor Niklas Zennström, Founder of Skype Mark Zuckerberg, Founder of Facebook
The purpose from the beginning has been to “identify and advance a future-oriented global agenda, focusing on issues at the intersection of the public and private sectors.”
Public–Private Partnerships is one of the cornerstones of the World Economic Forum philosophy. That is, a merger between state and large companies (also known as corporativism) with the aim of solving global problems of in a more “effective” way. The choice of leaders clearly reflects this aspiration.
The Young Global Leaders group was initially instructed to identify the major challenges of the 21st century. These included peace, the environment, education, technology and health – areas which these upcoming leaders could exploit politically, economically, and culturally in the new millennium.
Partners for Global Leaders of Tomorrow in 2000 were large global companies such as The Coca Cola Company, Ernst & Young, Volkswagen, and BP Amoco. These could contribute to the agenda by “playing an active role in developing and implementing the concept of the GLT project. The partners can therefore actively participate in the development of GLT programs; representatives of the partner companies as well as their guests are invited to GLT meetings .. ” Since the Global Leaders of Tomorrow was turned into Young Global Leaders 2004, partners such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, and JPMorganChase (with alumni from the program) have also participated as sponsors.
Partners for Global Leaders of Tomorrow in 2000 were large global companies such as The Coca Cola Company, Ernst & Young, Volkswagen, and BP Amoco. These could contribute to the agenda by “playing an active role in developing and implementing the concept of the GLT project. The partners can therefore actively participate in the development of GLT programs; representatives of the partner companies as well as their guests are invited to GLT meetings … ”
Since the Global Leaders of Tomorrow was turned into Young Global Leaders 2004, partners such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, and JPMorganChase (with alumni from the program) have also participated as sponsors.
The ultimate consequence of both public–private partnerships and these target areas is the creation of a largely fascist social contract in which the individual has become subordinated to these powerful interests. Noble goals of creating a better world have also been kidnapped. This is especially evident in the context of the partnership between the WEF and the UN and the implementation of the global goals (Agenda 2030) through the application of the technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
This means that the democratic principles and division of power of the 20th century have largely been completely undermined and instead replaced by a new global class that shapes our common future based on their own interests. This has led to a de facto privatisation of both national governments and international organisations, where lobbyists are no longer kept in the lobby but have moved into the seat of power, shaping policies directly affecting our lives. What this means has become particularly evident since the pandemic was declared in March 2020.
In addition, leading multinational investment management corporations such as BlackRock, led by the World Economic Forum’s own Larry Fink, have constantly moved their positions forward.
German economist and journalist Ernst Wolff believes that many of the national leaders included in the Young Global Leader program have been selected for their willingness to carry out the tough agenda of lockdowns in recent years without asking any questions, and that their impending failure (as evidenced by in a growing dissatisfaction of the masses) will be used as an excuse to create a new form of Global Government where the old nation states become largely obsolete. A new global digital currency with Universal Basic Income (UBI) can then be gradually introduced to replace our doomed monetary system. [4]
This conclusion partly coincides with my own. It is also supported by Paul Raskin‘s scenarios from The Great Transition Initiative on how a totalitarian “New Earth Order” is established, to be replaced in the long run by a global democratic government (Earth Federation) with a World Constitution. [5] “The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the catastrophic failure of an every-country-for-itself approach to public health, and national economic interests, rather than global needs, continue to dominate discussions of climate policy, paving the path toward climate chaos. Under the tricameral World Parliament come the four main agencies of the Earth Federation government: the World Supreme Court system, the World Executive, the World Enforcement System, and the World Ombudsman.” [6] – Glen T. Martin, The Earth Constitution
The vision is that a peaceful and harmonious world in balance is created through the establishment of a World Federation with a World Parliament, World Government and a World Court. These are ideas that have long circulated in Club of Rome and closely connected New Age circles. The question is how such a new global system of power would escape the fate of being kidnapped by the same interests that created our current corrupt and failing system? This is in view of those who support projects such as The Great Transition (initiated with start-up capital from Steven Rockefeller). What is happening is rather a method of taking us to their ultimate solution in the form of a global technocratic control system.
However, it is highly unlikely that this plan will succeed. Awareness is spreading like wildfire and the panic of the elite increases as their narrative crumbles and people become more and more immune to the propaganda. Hence all the inquisitors and “fact checkers” who diligently gatekeep the narrative and help steer public opinion in the “right” direction. They are surely to be trusted since, for example, David Roy Thomson, Chairman of the Thomson Reuters Corporation, is an alumni of Global Leaders of Tomorrow, class of 1993.
It is now time to take control of our own destinies and to avoid falling into new traps.
![[Image: Screen-Shot-2022-02-09-at-15.00.09.png]](https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Screen-Shot-2022-02-09-at-15.00.09.png)
![[Image: Bill-Justin-1024x682.jpg]](http://pharos.stiftelsen-pharos.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Bill-Justin-1024x682.jpg)
![[Image: 14sigsepia.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/9yxWwxj/14sigsepia.jpg)
![[Image: Bill-Gates-Global-Leader-of-Tomorrow-199...001115.jpg]](https://humansbefree.com/wp-content/uploads/humansarefree.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Bill-Gates-Global-Leader-of-Tomorrow-1992-and-Justin-Trudeau-Young-Global-Leader-e1644858001115.jpg)