Maricopa Madness

[Mystic Wanderer]

Judge Coury, who was presiding over the AZ audit, has recused himself due to conflicts of interest. And, wouldn't you know it, the new judge on the case was appointed by former democrat Governor Janet Napolitano. The democrats are scared and doing everything they can to stop this audit. If the election was fair and the numbers are correct, why are they so afraid?

Reports are that the new judge in the Democrats’ latest attempt to prevent the Senate’s audit of the 2020 results was assigned by former Democrat Governor Janet Napolitano.  New hearing scheduled for tomorrow.

The new judge in the Democrats Maricopa County case where they are again trying to stop any audit by the Senate of the County’s 2020 election results was appointed by Janet Napolitano, the former governor and Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security:

See tweets and videos embedded in the article. Source Link

Reporter Brahm Resnik in Arizona says the current thinking is that the recusal of Judge Coury may allow Cyber Ninjas enough time to finish their work but the Democrats have told him they hope to have a hearing sooner than 10 days:

A hearing for the case is set for today. How about that! Government doesn't always move like molasses, not when it benefits the demonRats.  

Being as this new judge has ties to Perkins Coie LLP, who were behind the fake Russian Dossier to smear President Trump, I believe this judge also needs to rescue himself. 

Read the story here: New Judge In Maricopa County Audit Worked For Firm That Merged With Perkins Coie

If you live in AZ, call the judges clerk... 602-342-2925 and DEMAND he step down! (But be nice about it.)   
We The People can't allow the democrats to keep cheating the citizens like this. The world MUST see the fraud, once and for all. 


  

[Freija]

Yeah, this is partisan madness alright and this sham audit is a joke that sets a dangerous precedent.

The audit won't change the certified election results. Cyber Ninjas and their right-wing nutjob #stopthesteal president have no experience conducting such audits and the media and public is banned from the process and they want their methodology kept secret. So much for transparency and accountability.

BTW, Maricopa county registered voter.

Democrats fight 'sham audit' in Arizona, saying Republicans aim to justify voter suppression

[Ninurta]

Sham or not, if an audit is demanded, it needs to be done, Otherwise, voter confidence is damaged, as it gives a solid appearance that there is something to hide. If there isn't anything to hide, an audit should not be a problem, and it bolsters voter confidence. Plus it give the Leftists something to stick their tongues out about and yell "naa na na na naa!" if it turns out to be as they claim. What's not to love about that, assuming there ISN'T anything to hide, that is...

Whomever appointed the judge is not, by itself, a cause for recusal. Look at the judge's record, not their appointer's record. Napolitano is as dumb as a box of bricks, but that does not mean everyone she appointed are also dumb as boxes of bricks. If the judge has a track record of inability to be objective and keep politics out of the case, then yes, a recusal is in order. In the absence of any such record, then not so much.

Also, having "ties to" a firm does not mean you have a finger in every pie they bake.

.

[Mystic Wanderer]

I just heard on RedPill78News that the judge in the hearing today said he would allow the audit to continue until some time in April. I forget the exact date. 
However, there is another hearing tomorrow morning, so he could change his mind. 
Democrats are having a meltdown.  

[ABNARTY]

The whole audit is live streamed. Anyone can watch it. 

I have no problem with a full audit of elections, in AZ or anywhere. It's something which should be done anyway. I know politicians hyperventilate over the prospect and that's enough to tell you we need to do them. 

The sanctity of an election is far more important than any politician in any race.

[Mystic Wanderer]

The whole audit is live streamed. Anyone can watch it. 

I have no problem with a full audit of elections, in AZ or anywhere. It's something which should be done anyway. I know politicians hyperventilate over the prospect and that's enough to tell you we need to do them. 

The sanctity of an election is far more important than any politician in any race.

Yes, it is. Can't get much more transparent than that. At least we didn't put up cardboard over the windows and make all democrats leave the building like they did us. 

Here's the link. There is a way to zoom in, but I don't know how.  https://azaudit.org/

[F2d5thCav]

The whole audit is live streamed. Anyone can watch it. 

I have no problem with a full audit of elections, in AZ or anywhere. It's something which should be done anyway. I know politicians hyperventilate over the prospect and that's enough to tell you we need to do them. 

The sanctity of an election is far more important than any politician in any race.

Bingo.  Because when the guns begin to have their say, it will be absolutely too late for transparency and accountability.  Let's NOT go there.

Cheers

[Mystic Wanderer]

You can’t make this stuff up.

Don’t you always wonder how these judges get picked for cases around the country?  For example, how was it that an Obama Judge was picked to review Trump Election cases in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Michigan?  Note there were enough electoral college votes in these three states to give President Trump his election win.
In Arizona it was reported that it was an Obama Judge who threw Sidney Powell’s case out:

Powell’s team also filed a temporary restraining order (pdf) seeking to immediately block Ducey from delivering the certified election results to the electoral college while the court hears the case. Arizona certified its presidential election results on Nov. 30.

Judge Diane Humetewa threw out the lawsuit on Wednesday, saying that its allegations “are sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” and that it sought extraordinary relief.

Attorney and Professor David Clements shared in this presentation for Regent University that Judge Humetewa never provided Powell an opportunity to present her case and had her verdict completed a day after the attorneys were called in present their cases.  This judge likely had her mind made up before she even saw the case:

We are not sure how these judges were selected for these cases but we suspect that it was not a random event that they were.

This leads us to Arizona today:
We received information on how Judge Martin was picked for the election court case in Arizona after Judge Coury recused himself on Sunday.  Judge Martin, you may recall, was appointed by former Governor Janet Napolitano.

Our reporter made a couple of phone calls to determine who chose Napolitana-appointed Judge Martin to handle this election case in Arizona.


The first call made was to the office of Judge Pamela Gates.  It apparently is currently her responsibility to appoint judges in civil cases in the state.  Here is a portion of Judge Gates’ bio from the State’s website:

Judge Pamela Gates was appointed by Governor Jan Brewer in September 2009 to serve on the Maricopa County Superior Court. Judge Gates currently serves as the Civil Presiding Judge. Prior to her rotation to the Civil Department in June 2018, Judge Gates served as the Associate Presiding Judge of the Criminal Department.

A call was made to Judge Gate’s office, the woman who answered the phone said that it is Judge Gates’ responsibility to appoint judges to civil cases in Arizona, except for election and related audit cases.  This lady shared that for the current election audit case, it was Judge Thomason who selected Judge Martin for the case.

So a call was made to Judge Thomason’s office.  The lady who answered the phone there said that for the current case Judge Thomason did not select the judge for the case.  She said that the judge’s name was provided to their office and Judge Thomason released the information on who the judge was.  The woman shared that for recusals it’s the Presiding Judge who appoints the judge.  She then shared that it was Judge Gates who provided Judge Martin’s name.

Judge Gates is married to Maricopa County Supervisor Bill Gates.  Here is a state financial disclosure where Judge Gates notes her relationship with Bill Gates:

The American Bar Association has a code of conduct that all attorneys must abide by.  A judge must avoid any impropriety or appearance of impropriety.

CANON 1: A judge shall uphold and promote the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.

Judge Gates has a clear conflict, if not an obvious appearance of conflict, in any cases related to Maricopa County elections and audit.  She never should have selected Judge Martin for the current case.  She should be recused and Judge Martin should be recused and a new independent judge should pick an independent judge to oversee this case.
So Judge Pamela Gates, the wife of one of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Bill Gates, chose who was to preside over the election audit case.  This same Bill Gates is part of the group that has done everything it could to prevent an audit of Maricopa County’s 2020 Election results. His wife just appointed a Janet Napolitano appointed judge to the Maricopa County election audit case.

Source

[ABNARTY]

You can’t make this stuff up.

Don’t you always wonder how these judges get picked for cases around the country?  For example, how was it that an Obama Judge was picked to review Trump Election cases in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Michigan?  Note there were enough electoral college votes in these three states to give President Trump his election win.
In Arizona it was reported that it was an Obama Judge who threw Sidney Powell’s case out:

Powell’s team also filed a temporary restraining order (pdf) seeking to immediately block Ducey from delivering the certified election results to the electoral college while the court hears the case. Arizona certified its presidential election results on Nov. 30.

Judge Diane Humetewa threw out the lawsuit on Wednesday, saying that its allegations “are sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” and that it sought extraordinary relief.

Attorney and Professor David Clements shared in this presentation for Regent University that Judge Humetewa never provided Powell an opportunity to present her case and had her verdict completed a day after the attorneys were called in present their cases.  This judge likely had her mind made up before she even saw the case:

We are not sure how these judges were selected for these cases but we suspect that it was not a random event that they were.

This leads us to Arizona today:
We received information on how Judge Martin was picked for the election court case in Arizona after Judge Coury recused himself on Sunday.  Judge Martin, you may recall, was appointed by former Governor Janet Napolitano.

Our reporter made a couple of phone calls to determine who chose Napolitana-appointed Judge Martin to handle this election case in Arizona.


The first call made was to the office of Judge Pamela Gates.  It apparently is currently her responsibility to appoint judges in civil cases in the state.  Here is a portion of Judge Gates’ bio from the State’s website:

Judge Pamela Gates was appointed by Governor Jan Brewer in September 2009 to serve on the Maricopa County Superior Court. Judge Gates currently serves as the Civil Presiding Judge. Prior to her rotation to the Civil Department in June 2018, Judge Gates served as the Associate Presiding Judge of the Criminal Department.

A call was made to Judge Gate’s office, the woman who answered the phone said that it is Judge Gates’ responsibility to appoint judges to civil cases in Arizona, except for election and related audit cases.  This lady shared that for the current election audit case, it was Judge Thomason who selected Judge Martin for the case.

So a call was made to Judge Thomason’s office.  The lady who answered the phone there said that for the current case Judge Thomason did not select the judge for the case.  She said that the judge’s name was provided to their office and Judge Thomason released the information on who the judge was.  The woman shared that for recusals it’s the Presiding Judge who appoints the judge.  She then shared that it was Judge Gates who provided Judge Martin’s name.

Judge Gates is married to Maricopa County Supervisor Bill Gates.  Here is a state financial disclosure where Judge Gates notes her relationship with Bill Gates:

The American Bar Association has a code of conduct that all attorneys must abide by.  A judge must avoid any impropriety or appearance of impropriety.

CANON 1: A judge shall uphold and promote the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.

Judge Gates has a clear conflict, if not an obvious appearance of conflict, in any cases related to Maricopa County elections and audit.  She never should have selected Judge Martin for the current case.  She should be recused and Judge Martin should be recused and a new independent judge should pick an independent judge to oversee this case.
So Judge Pamela Gates, the wife of one of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Bill Gates, chose who was to preside over the election audit case.  This same Bill Gates is part of the group that has done everything it could to prevent an audit of Maricopa County’s 2020 Election results. His wife just appointed a Janet Napolitano appointed judge to the Maricopa County election audit case.

Source

So if I got this right, the judge who had to recuse herself to avoid impropriety got to choose who would replace her? How does that promote independence, integrity, and impartiality? She will simply replace herself with someone of the same cloth. It will result in the same outcome. 

This last year or so has really left me with a sickening outlook on the judiciary. For the nay-sayers on here, it has nothing to do with the election. It has everything to do with due process, a fair trial, and election transparency.  Without those things, everyone is screwed.

[Mystic Wanderer]

@"ABNARTY" 

RedPill explains it perfectly in this short podcast:  https://redpill78news.com/new-maricopa-a...iscovered/

[Mystic Wanderer]

A message from our REAL POTUS:

Donald J. Trump
2:12pm May 15, 2021

The entire Database of Maricopa County in Arizona has been DELETED! This is illegal and the Arizona State Senate, who is leading the Forensic Audit, is up in arms. Additionally, seals were broken on the boxes that hold the votes, ballots are missing, and worse. Mark Brnovich, the Attorney General of Arizona, will now be forced to look into this unbelievable Election crime. Many Radical Left Democrats and weak Republicans are very worried about the fact that this has been exposed. The DELETION of an entire Database and critical Election files of Maricopa County is unprecedented. Many other States to follow. The Mainstream Media and Radical Left Democrats want to stay as far away as possible from the Presidential Election Fraud, which should be one of the biggest stories of our time. Fox News is afraid to cover it—there is rarely a mention. Likewise, Newsmax has been virtually silent on this subject because they are intimidated by threats of lawsuits. One America News (OAN), one of the fastest growing networks on television, and the “hottest”, is doing a magnificent job of exposing the massive fraud that took place. The story is only getting bigger and at some point it will be impossible for the weak and/or corrupt media not to cover. Thank you to OAN and other brave American Patriots. It is all happening quickly!

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/desk/desk-4yeh37peju/