China’s Incredible High-Definition Images of the Lunar Surface.

[Mystic Wanderer]

While exploring the lunar surface, China’s Chang’e 3 lander discovered a new type of moon rock, and managed to snap THOUSANDS of high-resolution images of the moon.

For the first time ever, you can take a peek at the lunar surface like never before thanks to the sophisticated cameras located onboard the Chang’e 3, one of China’s most advanced lunar landers.

While the mission took place in 2013, China’s National Space Administration released thousands of the high definition images during 2015. The images however, weren’t displayed by western media due to the fact that China is used to release images in a period of one to one and a half years after received them, using a website written in Chinese to showcase them, reason why western media didn’t put much effort into showcasing the images before.

Don't you love all the stars you can see from the moon?     This alone tells us this photo has been "doctored".  Wonder what they have blacked out that they don't want us to see?  Could it be all the bases up there?  Or, are there tall Reptilians standing close by giving the Chinese "the finger" like they did to the US astronauts when they landed?  

Not long ago, Planetary Society’s Emily Lakdawalla spent weeks searching through the photo trove –which has over 45 gigabytes of data—and presenting it all in a easily downloadable manner for the entire world to see.

Here are some photos they say came from the moon:

In 2017, China plans to send another lander to the moon which will even return numerous lunar samples back to Earth, exploring the moon in the process and helping researchers back on Earth understand the complex geology and origin of the moon, which has remained one of the most mysterious celestial objects in our solar system.

Nice, clear images.  Wonder why NASA can't show us images like this?

Apparently, the Reptilians didn't tell the Chinese not to come back like they did the Americans. Maybe it's because they didn't blow anything up on the moon, or drop anything heavy to make it ring like a bell for hours.  

You can read more and download more photos here:  Source

[Mystic Wanderer]

Is it possible that NASA bombed the moon in order to destroy an Alien base? According to many people around the world, the answer is a big YES.

According to a set of images and alleged reports, there are alien structures on the surface of the moon, and NASA launched a 2-ton kinetic weapon to destroy them, despite international laws clearly prohibiting it.

Thought I'd post this to bring those unaware of some of NASA's "missions".

Despite the fact that it strictly prohibited, NASA released a ‘Centaur’ kinetic weapon which ultimately impacted the moon.
In the last couple of decades, several extremely important treaties have made significant impact on Military Space Policy, and according to the Book The Paths Of Heaven: The Evolution Of Airpower Theory, the following treaties are of note:

1)   The Outer Space Treaty (OST) which dates back to 1967, clearly states that international law applies BEYOND the atmosphere. The treaty of 1967 reemphasized standing international laws and initiated new space-related laws: Free Access to space and celestial bodies for peaceful intent, prohibitions on national appropriations of space or celestial bodies, prohibitions on putting any weapons of mass destruction in space or on celestial bodies.

2)   The Antiballistic Missile (ABM) treaty of 1972 (which was signed between the USA and the USSR) banned the development, testing, and employment of space-based ABMs.

3)   The Convention on Registration (1974) requires parties to maintain a registry of objects launched into space and report orbital parameters and general function of those objects to the UN.

4)   And most importantly, the Environmental Modification Convention signed in 1980 which prohibits the hostile use of environmental modification.

Apart of the above-mentioned treaties, in 1977 a convention was concluded on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques which set out a number of prohibitions also with respect to outer space and celestial bodies.
Despite the above-mentioned facts, NASA modified the surface of the moon after launching the 2-ton kinetic weapon which created a 5-mile wide crater.

‘Officially’, the main LCROSS mission objective was to explore the presence of water ice in a permanently shadowed crater near a lunar polar region. The mission was launched together with the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) on June 18, 2009, as part of the shared Lunar Precursor Robotic Program, the first American mission to the Moon in over ten years.




This “bombed” moon base might perhaps explain why we haven’t been there in recent years, why would we avoid the Moon so much? We know that it is a place filled with minerals, it has water (and they really needed to bomb it to find out?) and it would make a perfect outpost for anyone who wants to continue the exploration of our solar system and it would also help us get to Mars and beyond.

However, despite the fact that many reports and enigmatic images of alleged structures on the moon are there, it’s nearly impossible to prove (or disprove for that matter) their existence and the truth behind until perhaps one day, we return to the Moon. However, returning to the moon isn’t a guarantee that we will finally have disclosure whether or not there is an alien presence on the moon.

It is a profound mystery why NASA decided to break international laws and literally BOMBED the moon for alleged scientific purposes.

Source

[Mystic Wanderer]

This image looks photo shopped to me.  Rocks aren't formed in a straight line like that big boulder.  It looks like something from the "edge" of the rock has been replaced by another image they don't want us to see. 
And what are those black "blobs" at the bottom on the right and in front of the boulder?  Looks like they forgot to fill part of that in.  

What are your thoughts?

[Ninurta]

Don't you love all the stars you can see from the moon?     This alone tells us this photo has been "doctored".  Wonder what they have blacked out that they don't want us to see?  Could it be all the bases up there?  

Here's an experiment that you, or anyone else, can try. Most folks have digital cameras these days, if only on a cell phone. Take your favorite camera to ANY nearby city or area with good lighting. Take a photo of those brightly lit buildings AND the starry sky behind and above them. Make sure you get both in the shot, as the Chinese did with these pictures. Play with the exposure if you like, and see how many stars you can get in the picture AND clear shots of the lit buildings in the same image.

You can even post them here. I'll be very, very interested to see if there is any way you can get both in the same image. Every time I, or anyone else I know, has tried, they have either gotten the stars, with the foreground an overexposed wash, OR the foreground in sharp detail, but with no stars in the image.

That's because of shutter speed and exposure. If you expose the image long enough for the stars to appear, then everything else has too much light captured on it, and is a wash out. If you get the foreground sharp and clear, you can't capture enough light from the pinpoint stars to get them to show. It's always been either/or, and never both. the only way I've found to get both is to take TWO exposures of the same scene, one way over exposed and one under exposed, and Phototshop them together into a single image.

SO - contrary to the claim that a lack of stars shows a picture to have been "doctored", it's actually the PRESENCE of stars that would show it to have been doctored.

Nice, clear pictures of the lunar surface, though! Kudos for finding them!


.

[Mystic Wanderer]

Here is another thing...  What is this design in the lower right of the picture?  Is this some important symbol in China, or were they doing some kind of ritual on the moon?    

[Mystic Wanderer]

Don't you love all the stars you can see from the moon?     This alone tells us this photo has been "doctored".  Wonder what they have blacked out that they don't want us to see?  Could it be all the bases up there?  

Here's an experiment that you, or anyone else, can try. Most folks have digital cameras these days, if only on a cell phone. Take your favorite camera to ANY nearby city or area with good lighting. Take a photo of those brightly lit buildings AND the starry sky behind and above them. make sure you get both in the shot, as the Chinese did with these pictures. Play with the exposure of you like, and see how many stars you can get in the picture AND clear shots of the lit buildings in the same image.

You can even post them here. I'll be very, very interested to see if there is any way you can get both in the same image. Every time I, or anyone else I know, has tried, they have either gotten the stars, with the foreground an overexposed wash, OR the foreground in sharp detail, but with no stars in the image.

That's because of shutter speed and exposure. If you expose the image long enough for the stars to appear, then everything else has too much light captured on it, and is a wash out. If you get the foreground sharp and clear, you can't capture enough light from the pinpoint stars to get them to show. It's always been either/or, and never both. the only way I've found to get both is to take TWO exposures of the same scene, one way over exposed and one under exposed, and Phototshop them together into a single image.

SO - contrary to the claim that a lack of stars shows a picture to have been "doctored", it's actually the PRESENCE of stars that would show it to have been doctored.

Nice, clear pictures of the lunar surface, though! Kudos for finding them!


.

Thanks for that explanation.  Makes sense.  

[Ninurta]

Thanks for that explanation.  Makes sense.  

Grace tells me that there is something called a"graduated neutral density filter" that can get both is the same shot by filtering the light at the bottom of the picture more than it filters the light at the top, thereby having a "graduated" exposure along the same image, so it IS technically possible, according to her.

The catch is that the Chinese, or NASA, would have to have some reason for wanting to get both in order for them to consider adding a filter like that to their machines, and they would have to justify the possibility of filtering something out in the image that they might want to see. It's not like they've got someone standing close by the camera to switch the filters out at will, unless they could convince one of those reptilians standing there to do it for them.

[Daitengu]

The lizard peoole hid cos the chinese would barbeque em an have snack with beer while singing karaoke ....