Study Shows All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition

[Mystic Wanderer]

Field McConnell talked about this during his interview with Sean Stone on Buzzsaw that aired on Gaia t.v. last week.  He said he talked with a man who knows for a fact that explosive devices were hidden inside the walls, so that makes this whole thing a premeditated mass murder.  He also named who was behind it; probably not who you have thought. 

Please go watch that episode on Gaia t.v.  It's only .99 for the first month, then if you don't want to continue, you can cancel.

Disclaimer: I'm in no way affiliated with GAIA t.v.

Renowned Physics Journal Concludes in New Study: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition

New York, NY – Over the past 15 years many highly respected academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the WTC towers forwarded by the U.S. government. The official government position holds that the collapse of all three towers was due to intense heat inside of the buildings.
But a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News – a highly respected European physics magazine – claims that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”
While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as “tin foil hat” conspiracy theorist, many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes.

Read more about the study here: Source Link

I will post this video of McConnell on a podcast with the Richie Allen Show where he discusses 9-11, but if you can go watch Buzzsaw, please do!



https://youtu.be/rJUkFTXfNW0


What is your view on 9-11 after hearing this news?

[guohua]

Sorry, but I didn't then and I don't now believe this.
I've read their claims and what their logic is and I Believe very strongly with all the Combustible and Inflammatory Material that Jet Fuel Could Burn That Hot to collapse those buildings.

Something these people fail to realize, building where not and are not built to withstand the destructive force of a jet aircraft loaded with fuel and people and it's on Combustibles, Crashing into at a Very High rate Of Speed.
Beside, doesn't the contract to build go to the lowest bidder? Who Believes they use the best building materials?  
JMO  Have a drink and lets be friends.

[Mystic Wanderer]

Sorry, but I didn't then and I don't now believe this.
I've read their claims and what their logic is and I Believe very strongly with all the Combustible and Inflammatory Material that Jet Fuel Could Burn That Hot to collapse those buildings.

Something these people fail to realize, building where not and are not built to withstand the destructive force of a jet aircraft loaded with fuel and people and it's on Combustibles, Crashing into at a Very High rate Of Speed.
Beside, doesn't the contract to build go to the lowest bidder? Who Believes they use the best building materials?  
JMO  Have a drink and lets be friends.

Did you watch the video?  Field offers a lot of convincing "evidence" if you ask me, and he also knows a lot about planes. 

I wish 727Sky would come on here and offer his opinion.  I tried to get him to comment on the other thread, but he never did. 

I would like to know if he agrees with what Field says about planes.


By the way...  I'll have a red wine please.  

[guohua]

Sorry, but I didn't then and I don't now believe this.
I've read their claims and what their logic is and I Believe very strongly with all the Combustible and Inflammatory Material that Jet Fuel Could Burn That Hot to collapse those buildings.

Something these people fail to realize, building where not and are not built to withstand the destructive force of a jet aircraft loaded with fuel and people and it's on Combustibles, Crashing into at a Very High rate Of Speed.
Beside, doesn't the contract to build go to the lowest bidder? Who Believes they use the best building materials?  
JMO  Have a drink and lets be friends.

Did you watch the video?  Field offers a lot of convincing "evidence" if you ask me, and he also knows a lot about planes. 

I wish 727Sky would come on here and offer his opinion.  I tried to get him to comment on the other thread, but he never did. 

I would like to know if he agrees with what Field says about planes.


By the way...  I'll have a red wine please.  

[Daitengu]

Known that from the start ...... hell  ...... any good demo specialist could tell by looking at it ...... 

Thank you ..... the lads will be around to collect my consultation fee now .......

[gordi]

...Something these people fail to realize, building where not and are not built to withstand the destructive force of a jet aircraft loaded with fuel and people and it's on Combustibles, Crashing into at a Very High rate Of Speed....

uhm... MrsG.... I hate to say this but.... the twin towers were specifically built AND TESTED to withstand a high speed (600mph) impact of a boeing 707 (which was just about the largest airliner in the skies at the time the twin towers were designed).

The LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER who worked on the WTC towers (John Skilling) said in an interview in 1993:

“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side… Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. [But] the building structure would still be there.”

Here's a LINK


kindest regards,
BigG

[Mystic Wanderer]

...Something these people fail to realize, building where not and are not built to withstand the destructive force of a jet aircraft loaded with fuel and people and it's on Combustibles, Crashing into at a Very High rate Of Speed....

uhm... MrsG.... I hate to say this but.... the twin towers were specifically built AND TESTED to withstand a high speed (600mph) impact of a boeing 707 (which was just about the largest airliner in the skies at the time the twin towers were designed).

The LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER who worked on the WTC towers (John Skilling) said in an interview in 1993:

“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side… Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. [But] the building structure would still be there.”

Here's a LINK


kindest regards,
BigG

Thanks Gordi. 

 And McConnell explained that in the video too, along with telling about speaking with the man that witnessed the explosives being put inside the walls.  He had a lot of things to tell that I had never heard on any other videos/articles.  He has a lot of friends in very high places, so I think what he says is very credible.

[guohua]

Ok, I stand Corrected.

[Jude]

The most popular vids are disappearing from YT but some remain:




And even IF the 2 towers REALLY collapsed from the planes, what about building 7 with no hits?


All planned? Of course.




I always tell people that when talking to someone and trying to give evidence of the towers being brought down on purpose, the most logical approach is to show building 7. Many people still have no idea of that building.

Jude

[1984hasarrived]

Yep, what @Gordi said - I was going to dig that video out.

(sarcasm font) And no shit, Sherlock my smack is certainly gobbed at this revelation (/sarcasm font)

And as I do when people want to chat about 911, if ANYONE can explain the collapse of Building 7 I would be happy to hear their "theory" on that and continue the discussion.

ETA



A version of the BBC report from Jude's post, with comments embedded on the video, explaining the errors.

[senona]

And as I do when people want to chat about 911, if ANYONE can explain the collapse of Building 7 I would be happy to hear their "theory" on that and continue the discussion.

That is a mystery to my husband and I as well.
WTH did Tower 7 have to do with the other 2 buildings?
Not a damn thing.


Not to mention, the Twin Towers went down in a perfect implosion, as when a building is set to be demolished.
They went straight down, more or less, and did not lean outward as many would think it would fall to the side.
But they fell as more of a 'controlled' explosion IMO.



Also, there was a black man that swore in building 7, he heard explosions going off as he was running out of the building.
Do you know, he suffered a "heart attack" before he was supposed to testify to that in court???  Yeah right, I know.
Call me paranoid, call me a conspiracy nut but this whole thing smacks of setup for one reason or another. THAT is the million dollar question tho....the "WHY" to it all.

Why those towers, other than the obvious symbolism.


To pass intrusive laws that violate our privacy?

Give up a little bit of our 'rights' all in the name of National Security?
To what purpose?

I know everything our government does (regardless of who is in office), have a plan/agenda in place that may play out for years for it to take effect.

Just curious as to what the final outcome (game plan) of the destruction of the Twin Towers will be towards American citizens?