02-04-2022, 07:54 AM
Did they have a logical explanation for why Young would still have a financial interest in the part of his musical catalog if he sold it off to another owner? So much so that he would try to use properties not his to sway opinion in favor of censorship?
The only explanation I need is that he is a chickenshit dickhead.
I mean, if it was me, and I sold off half my catalog to someone else, if they came back and told me what I had to do about it, I'd just tell 'em it was theirs, do with it as they wished, and it sounds like a personal problem they're having to me, no longer any of my business.
.
The only explanation I need is that he is a chickenshit dickhead.
I mean, if it was me, and I sold off half my catalog to someone else, if they came back and told me what I had to do about it, I'd just tell 'em it was theirs, do with it as they wished, and it sounds like a personal problem they're having to me, no longer any of my business.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’