07-27-2021, 11:55 PM
I've never trusted Ed and Lorraine Warren, anyhow. I've never caught them uttering anything spook related that was true. They seem to be in it for the money to me, but I know a lot of folks swear by them and hang on to their every word... but to me that just tells me that they are capable of doing incalculable damage to the field of parapsychology.
The Ghost Monk in the church - the only way that could have been a double exposure would be if it were an intentional one. The monk would have had to have been photographed in his black robe against a solid screen of some other color, and the church interior superimposed or "second photoed" on top of that image, because there was no competing double background n the photo. Since the clergyman who took the photo has an unassailable reputation for honesty, I can see him intentionally having done that.
.
The Ghost Monk in the church - the only way that could have been a double exposure would be if it were an intentional one. The monk would have had to have been photographed in his black robe against a solid screen of some other color, and the church interior superimposed or "second photoed" on top of that image, because there was no competing double background n the photo. Since the clergyman who took the photo has an unassailable reputation for honesty, I can see him intentionally having done that.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’