The senate is nearly an even split currently, with Harris having to tie-break, and Dems only have 9 seats over Republicans in the House, so it's doable I think, although far-fetched. We also have to factor in the RINOS like Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Lindsay Graham, Mitch McConnell, etc, who have an R beside their name but vote as Democrats. They have to go too in order to regain any semblance of Liberty in America. The government will not vote to get back within it's constitutional limits so long as you have folks claiming to be on your side but consistently voting against your side while in office.
Now, the 29 and still counting Democrats who have declared their intent to not run again are, to my mind, not really a big deal. The vast majority of those will just be replaced by other Democrats, and probably more Progressive squaddies, because they are all from D districts - that's how they got in office to begin with. I don't count on those 29 retirements to haul our fat out of the fire. They might actually make matters worse by retiring from politics and opening seats for Marxists from their districts.
The fight to regain liberty is far from over. The Marxists are so close to victory they can taste it, and they won't give up without a dirty street brawl. Take NC for example - right now, Marxists there are trying to go through the courts to keep a conservative off the ballot and steal votes from patriots that way. They are attempting to stack the deck by disenfranchising entire voting districts, keeping them from voting for their choice of representative, just like the bastards did during Reconstruction. Matter of fact, they are trying to bar him on 14th Amendment grounds, which was an amendment passed during Reconstruction for that very reason - to keep anyone questioning their radical narrative or standing in the way of their radical agenda from gaining any political say. They are claiming that he was a mastermind of the Jan 6th "insurrection", which would bar him from ever holding office on grounds of participating in rebellion against the government.
Matter of fact, that is likely WHY they are pushing that fake "insurrection" narrative so hard.
During Reconstruction, they disenfranchised an entire generation to change the narrative and accomplish an agenda, and the south has not yet fully recovered from that to this day, a century and a half later. Former Confederate states were occupied territories, and had to vote in favor of that amendment before they were allowed back into the US. It was a condition of readmission, a twisting of the arm.
They have a bottomless bag of dirty tricks, and if we don't get up to speed, we will drop right out of the race.
.
Now, the 29 and still counting Democrats who have declared their intent to not run again are, to my mind, not really a big deal. The vast majority of those will just be replaced by other Democrats, and probably more Progressive squaddies, because they are all from D districts - that's how they got in office to begin with. I don't count on those 29 retirements to haul our fat out of the fire. They might actually make matters worse by retiring from politics and opening seats for Marxists from their districts.
The fight to regain liberty is far from over. The Marxists are so close to victory they can taste it, and they won't give up without a dirty street brawl. Take NC for example - right now, Marxists there are trying to go through the courts to keep a conservative off the ballot and steal votes from patriots that way. They are attempting to stack the deck by disenfranchising entire voting districts, keeping them from voting for their choice of representative, just like the bastards did during Reconstruction. Matter of fact, they are trying to bar him on 14th Amendment grounds, which was an amendment passed during Reconstruction for that very reason - to keep anyone questioning their radical narrative or standing in the way of their radical agenda from gaining any political say. They are claiming that he was a mastermind of the Jan 6th "insurrection", which would bar him from ever holding office on grounds of participating in rebellion against the government.
Matter of fact, that is likely WHY they are pushing that fake "insurrection" narrative so hard.
During Reconstruction, they disenfranchised an entire generation to change the narrative and accomplish an agenda, and the south has not yet fully recovered from that to this day, a century and a half later. Former Confederate states were occupied territories, and had to vote in favor of that amendment before they were allowed back into the US. It was a condition of readmission, a twisting of the arm.
They have a bottomless bag of dirty tricks, and if we don't get up to speed, we will drop right out of the race.
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’