Oh wow....another former FBI comes forward to let Comey know how he mishandled this whole case.
Favoritism towards the Clinton's most definitely at play.
"Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved.
It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation….NOT the FBI agent.
But in the Clinton investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S. but, instead, personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon yourself. Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence , or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?"
That there alone, ought to have many question Comey's actions now.
In fact, Trump said if he were elected President, he would open an investigation into the Hillary Email investigation itself, which Comey purposely covered up for HRC.
Might be the reason they are trying so hard (and desperately I might add) to sling shit Trumps way to get voters turned from him, so he would lose.
Just what were in those emails that has a lead FBI agent forget about protocol and even risk tarnishing his career?
Not to mention the reputation of the FBI Agency in general.
Is there shit in there that Obama had said that they don't want out? (one rumor, that it was to protect Obama)
Curious.....
Favoritism towards the Clinton's most definitely at play.
"Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved.
It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation….NOT the FBI agent.
But in the Clinton investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S. but, instead, personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon yourself. Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence , or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?"
That there alone, ought to have many question Comey's actions now.
In fact, Trump said if he were elected President, he would open an investigation into the Hillary Email investigation itself, which Comey purposely covered up for HRC.
Might be the reason they are trying so hard (and desperately I might add) to sling shit Trumps way to get voters turned from him, so he would lose.
Just what were in those emails that has a lead FBI agent forget about protocol and even risk tarnishing his career?
Not to mention the reputation of the FBI Agency in general.
Is there shit in there that Obama had said that they don't want out? (one rumor, that it was to protect Obama)
Curious.....