Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
This is how you take back your streets
#34
(06-08-2022, 05:33 PM)Snarl Wrote: I agree. Need to make them pay to take and hold ground. Make anything they want to take less appealing than they desire.

Starts by shooting down the long-distance electrical lines.  Hook a decent sized span to your trailer hitch and haul it off into the woods a half mile.  Shoot any mother-effer who comes along to survey. If this happens in enough places ... in short order ... there'll be a secondary effect of a small nuclear crisis to tackle ... that could escalate quickly into a major nuclear disaster. Guaranteed if there's anyone waiting to knock over those power plants when the reinforcements come a-runnin'.

The government has what ... maybe ... 3 million guys they can call-up? There's a 100+ million gun owners. I don't care if they come with tanks and planes, they don't have the ability to kill us all.  Laughably ... the last time I looked ... there wasn't a one-to-one ratio of bullets to Chinese soldier.  That might be fixed now, but they don't have the kinetic weaponry to stop 100 million angry-assed Americans.

And ... if they do decide to 'push it' ... the gun owners may find their ranks swelling by people who won't sit the fence anymore.  What Brandon has done to the economy ... and the way he's robbing people at the gas pumps ... people are getting pissed.

Keep in mind that the BidenHarris regime had it's ass handed to it by around 15000 illiterate goat-herders in Afghanistan, and they used all that armor and air power there, too. It was kind of like Vietnam in a way - the soldiers won their battles, and the politicians lost the whole damned war. Wars are won by troops on the ground, and lost by hollow-headed politicians in offices thousands of miles away.

One of the keys to winning any such conflict is making it too politically expensive for the opposition to continue pursuing. Bullets, AR's, tanks and planes mean nothing if you break the opponent's will to effectively use them. Everyone knows how the BidenHarris regime worries over their image on "the world stage", so that would be the proper weak point to assault, I think. How's it gonna look to the rest of the world with BidenHarris bombing the living shit out of it's own citizens in large numbers? That right there shows that the regime in power - and this holds true for any country, anywhere - has lost the confidence and good-will of it's own people badly enough to have to attack them.

That plays great on the nightly news, world wide. It;s hard to maintain the fiction that it's just a little bunch of "extremists" when half or more of the entire population is being troublesome... that tends to make folks really wonder whether it's the People who are the problem, or their government that is the problem.

Folks may disagree with their Gramps or Uncle Hugh, but do they really want the government solving that disagreement by bombing the shit out of their own relatives? Some few may, but I bet the majority would be saying "the fuck did you just do to my grandpa and grandma?"

Another facet you touched upon is "taking and holding ground". That is what conventional adversaries have to do to win, but the exact opposite of what guerrilla adversaries have to do to win. Guerrillas make it cost dearly to take and hold a patch of ground, then they just melt away to go to an uncontested patch of ground and regroup. That reduces the value of the ground taken (no one left there to lord it over), and forces the conventional forces to have to take yet another patch of ground at a dear cost, thinning out their ranks at any one place until they are utterly pulled apart and way too thin on the ground they are trying to hold. Wash, rinse, repeat.

In order for the conventional forces to win, they must entirely eradicate the guerrillas, and "genocide" is recognized in most places to be a bad, bad, thing - especially when it is on the nightly news in folks living rooms, night after night after night. In order for the guerrillas to win, all they have to do is survive long enough for world opinion to eat the conventional forces.

Battles are won and lost on the ground, but wars are won and lost in the heart and mind.

What any aspiring guerillas would have to learn is the concept of not holding ground. That's tough when they have a mortgage on that ground. Luckily, the WEF, Vanguard, Blackrock, etc. are slowly but surely fixing that problem in their greed to own everyone else's shit. Once you have taken everything a man has, what does he have left to lose?

They are busy sewing the seeds of their own destruction, and they are doing it on stolen land with stolen moveable property.

That ain't very "sustainable" when the peasants get hungry enough.

It's how the first American Revolution was won - the British won most of the major engagements, but the Continentals dragged them through enough of those engagements, with a promise of no end in sight, until the British finally threw in the towel and decided that the colonies were no longer worth fighting over.

.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.

Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’




Messages In This Thread
RE: This is how you take back your streets - by Ninurta - 06-08-2022, 09:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)