10-19-2016, 07:31 PM
(10-19-2016, 08:27 AM)Ninurta Wrote:(10-17-2016, 02:55 PM)?Sol Wrote: I guess they can't blame Russian hackers for that one, eh?
To hear that Wikileaks is a Russian front is one of the most ridiculous claims that I've ever heard.
I believe there is a method to the madness, and do not believe, not even for an instant, the "Russians" are behind the various hacks and election riggings.
Walk with me on this short journey, would you?
Who are the parental units of ISIS? Who had fed, clothed, and nurtured them, supplied arms and sustenance to them? Who has sent troops to train them? Who gave Libya to the Muslim Brotherhood, al Qaeda, and ISIS? Who tried to do the same to Egypt before Sisi put the skids to it? That would be the Obama Administration in general, amd Big Mama Hillary in particular.
Now, stay with me on this - who is vigorously killing the ISIS love children of Hillary and Obama? Who is actually prosecuting a serious war against them? That would be Assad and the Russians, seemingly the only people left in the world actually fighting for our freedom, not just theirs but yours and mine. I'd have never believed it would turn out like this during the dark days of the Cold War.
Here we go - what is the best way to demonize an "enemy", working against one's ill-advised plans? That's right - accuse them of meddling in your affairs and attacking you. Play the victim card, which the DNC is so well practiced at. For God's sakes, those folks are professional victims, and this is just a public demonstration of their prowess at it!
Note the situation in Aleppo - the UN says "no more relief convoys - ISIS is attacking them and taking the stuff!" Obama says "Yes, more relief convoys, because ISIS is running low on shit to 'steal'!" So to protect the ISIS supply lines, he up and bombs the crap out of THE PEOPLE ACTUALLY KILLING ISIS... and then lays out the claim that "it's for the children" (an old standby of the leftists for pushing through evil plans) - and no one even thinks to ask just WHICH children it's "for"! All indications are that it's for the Obama-Clinton bastard love children, and no one notices because it's for some kind of children!
So then, to continue the journey, Hillary has publicly threatened to take war to the Russians (but Trump is the warmonger, keep in mind). Of course, she blames it on some e-mail hacks, but what, I ask, does the information presented actually hint at for a reason? You can't very well say that "the goddamned Russians are killin' off my ISIS BABIES!"
What's a girl to do? Well, she pays some poor sap to "leak" info readily available at hand to the DNC, and then blame it on "them damned Rooskies!" so that there is a plausible pretense to go to war with them if they don't quit killin' the chilluns!
Then ice the fall guy who did the leaks, because "dead men tell no tales", and proceed to make the case for war against the only folks saving our bacon at the moment.
Did you know that ISIS has come out to publicly support Hillary? Yes they have! Them boys may not be as dumb as they look - they know who puts the butter on their bread!
Plausible, or not so much plausible? You decide - I'm going to grab another beer and watch the show, because the curtain is rising... it's just that WE are on the wrong side of that Iron Curtain this time.
.
I agree with you. Even Trump has said - and during a debate where millions of viewers were 'listening' - that the only ones fighting ISIS were Russia, Syria and Iran.
I didn't know that they publicly came out supporting Hillary though. God damn media, only showing us what they want us to see. Again, not surprised.
The Head masters have it down to a pat.
As a Canadian, I can only wish you luck with your next President. You're gonna need it.
Sol.
~ Today is the youngest you'll ever be again ~