10-10-2021, 04:31 PM
Both "Live Science" and the Smithsonian Magazine have a more or less neutral political bias and strong scientific references. See the Media Bias Fact Check and Ad Fontes Media quotes below.
I guess the Smithsonian and Live Science's political bias may vary depending on the article writer but they are good for their source references apparently. Not much help here, but I suspect their is some left leaning bias in this particular article.
Quote:Overall, we rate Smithsonian Magazine a Pro-Science source based on publishing research-based information on science. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing to credible research and a clean fact check record.
Quote:The following are Smithsonian Magazine’s overall bias and reliability scores according to our Ad Fontes Media ratings methodology.
Reliability: 45.50
Bias: -3.72
Reliability scores for articles and shows are on a scale of 0-64. Scores above 24 are generally acceptable; scores above 32 are generally good. Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to + 42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and scores closer to zero being the most neutral and/or balanced.
I guess the Smithsonian and Live Science's political bias may vary depending on the article writer but they are good for their source references apparently. Not much help here, but I suspect their is some left leaning bias in this particular article.