The UK's Brexit Referendum.

[BIAD]

Well! That bit just strengthens my comparison of Johnson to Trump - it's probably more than just sharing a hairdresser!
They're calling for his "removal" before the ink is even dry on the ballots, just as they did over here with Trump.

It's an eerily strong reaction which indicates to me that these men are very dangerous indeed to the Socialist Agenda,
and the Socialists are losing their minds and melting down before they even see their precious Socialism swirling down
the drain into the cesspool it belongs in!

Yeah, the pundits in the media have names for this style of governance, but it involves a feeling of self-reliance and
a steadfastness against anyone wanting to take right to pursue of what you deem appropriate for yourself, your family
and community.

It used be called 'Being Normal'.
..........................................................

I noticed this on the BBC web-page and thought that since the title was 'General election 2019: How Labour's 'red wall' turned blue',
it would possibly explain to the reader why so many working-class communities around the the UK voted for the Conservative Party
instead of a political group that originated from the lower strata of general society.

Apart from the information of which Labour-held electoral seats were lost, the BBC offered a weak-assed, milk-toast reason of why
the British public chose Boris Johnson and his party. For some odd reason, the BBC has always favoured the classic rhetoric of the
Labour Party about diversity and multiculturalism.

Yet, if you're Jewish and a member of Jeremy Corbyn's political gang, it's not all sweetness and Eloi-biscuits for breakfast.
Which in itself is strange, Jon Lansman -a big noise in the Momentum organisation and ran Corbyn's 2019 campaign is Jewish!
Hell, if you adhered to the old Right-wing side of politics, you still wouldn't be welcome in this hate-filled, champagne-socialist
assemblage of upper-middle-class young people who see everyone as racists and bigots.

But the BBC won't tell you that.

'Nastiness and hostility'
Some blamed Brexit, others Jeremy Corbyn.

Phil Wilson, who stood for Labour in Mr Blair's old constituency of Sedgefield in County Durham, said the Labour leader went
down "like a lead balloon" with voters on the doorstep. "For Labour leadership to blame Brexit for the result is mendacious
nonsense.
Jeremy Corbyn's leadership was a bigger problem. To say otherwise is delusional," he tweeted.

One of Mr Corbyn's closest allies - the former Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone - said it "looked like the end" for the Labour leader,
and he would probably "have to resign". But Labour chairman Ian Lavery, who retained his Wansbeck seat in Northumberland by 814
votes, said the party had suffered a lot of "hostility", "resentment" and "nastiness" because of its position on Brexit.

"People feel let down, that's the reality of it," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme, citing Labour's support for a second EU
referendum having previously said it would accept the result of the first.
"We lost trust and we cannot as a party continue to promise one thing and do another."

Losing her Don Valley seat in South Yorkshire, Caroline Flint - never a fan of Mr Corbyn and Leave supporter - blamed Mr Corbyn's
leadership and Remain-backing MPs for the party's performance.
The former Labour minister's former seat has existed since 1918 and had never before had a Conservative MP.

She claimed she had been "fighting on" two fronts; the first being voters not wanting to support Mr Corbyn as Prime Minister and the
second of Labour "being more like a 'stop Brexit' Remain party."...'

BBC:

No mention of Corbyn's Marxist beliefs or his affinity for terrorist leaders. Not a comment on how the Trotskyist cult 'Momentum'
-a far-Left group of activists within the labour Party, worked to clear a path for... shall we say, those of a different persuasion to
Zionism.

If a country has embraced capitalism and looks to improving the standards of its citizens through trade and acquiring businesses to
employ those citizens, then surely for the majority -and with a little self-responsibility, a fair lifestyle can be achieved.

But for Corbyn's crew, they wanted total fairness that involved taking wealth from the rich and handing it to those they deemed not as
well-off. They believed over-taxing the rich would be a way of punishing those who showed enterprise and in their envy-filled hearts,
they saw the Jewish communities of the UK as the true guardians of that wealth.

Momentum hate winners and losers and they convinced their party-leader that their style off communism could be sold to the British
public... as long as it was worded correctly.

But they never checked history.