Evidence that demands a verdict

[Ninurta]

which you are not equipped to see.
It's a matter of perception .. no, it's a matter of being what it is < follow the science
Atheists are only equipped to see randomness .. and therein lies your folly ...... later dude

11-20-2017 .. Complex grammar in the genome defies evolution 
11-20-2017 .. Complex grammar of the genomic language 
11-11-2017 .. DNA Molecules and the Odds Against Evolution

"no, it's a matter of being what it is < follow the science"

I'd be happy to, and am equipped to do so. All I need is for you to explain what you think "the science" IS. Until you can do that, my comment stands as is. The perception of a Theist and the perception of an Atheist will be different, given the same set of observations, because their knowledge and experiential bases are different. Either can only understand what they can comprehend, and both have different bases of comparison to comprehend with. "Science" is not nearly as cut and dried as either you or your opponents seem to think.

"and therein lies your folly ...... later dude"

Well! THAT was helpful! Why don't you make an attempt to explain how you think my "folly" factors into that sentence at all? You may note, with a careful reading of my posts, that nowhere have I claimed to be an Atheist, and in fact I am not one. Equipped with that knowledge, I'm at a loss to understand how you think my "folly" related to that sentence at all.

Explaining yourself goes a long way in promotion debate and discussion. Just throwing out randomness and skating with a "later dude", well, not so much.

.