Project Veritas information on Epstein. Watch this before YT removes it!
It's all there and they won't show you!
Bastard MSM.
From a Twitter user:
Quote:[/url] Mollie @MZHemingway
[url=https://twitter.com/MZHemingway]
· 34m
In addition to these statements not actually being responsive to what the initial hot mic claims were, mostly what this shows is that ABC News has indefensibly different standards for, e.g., Kavanaugh allegations or Covington boys then it does Clinton-connected pedophiles.
I agree! And think of all the children who have been abused in the last three years because ABC covered this up!
They should be sued by the victims!
(11-06-2019, 02:43 AM)guohua Wrote: I think this list has been sanitized.
I didn't find any mention of the Clintons.
But, the Trumps, Yes.
Trump, Robert & Blaine
Trump, Ivana
Trump, lvanka
Very interesting about Ivanka Trump being in his black book. That could just be people he had some kind of business dealings with. I think the more important list is the flight logs. Donald Trump is on that one, but only because he hitched a ride from FL back to NY. He never went to his pedo island.
We knew this was coming, right?
The staffer who released the tape of Amy Robach discussing her information regarding Epstein has been fired. Turns out it was a former employee at ABC who was, at the time of the release, working at CBS.
Quote:The former ABC News employee who leaked the video of Amy Robach talking about the network refusing to run her story on one of Jeffrey Epstein's accusers was fired from their current job at CBS News.
Project Veritas released a video Tuesday of Robach discussing the information she received years earlier from Virginia Roberts Giuffre on a hot mic. She can be heard expressing her frustration surrounding ABC News's refusal to air the interview and claimed that the network made the decision after receiving threats from Buckingham Palace after they had found out Prince Andrew was implicated in the story. She also alleged that Epstein may have been murdered.
"It was unbelievable what we had. Clinton, we had everything," she stated. "I tried for three years to get it on to no avail. And now it's all coming out, and it's like these new revelations, and I freaking had all of it."
The former ABC News employee who accessed the video has been fired from the person's current position at CBS News, according to journalist Yashar Ali.
But... but... I thought I just read how important it is to protect whistle-blowers from any backlash when they expose corruption. Isn't this what the Democrats are screaming about concerning their whistle-blower in the impeachment scam?
Hmmm... sigh, I guess the protection only applies when the information goes in favor of DemoRats and their Pedo gods!
(11-07-2019, 06:37 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Hmmm... sigh, I guess the protection only applies when the information goes in favor of DemoRats and their Pedo gods!
Editors Note: Project Veritas is publishing the writing below at the request of the ABC news insider who gave us the Amy Robach tape.
This was submitted to us in light of the actions taken against those wrongfully identified as involved in the leaking of the tape and the reactions of ABC news to their spiking of the story on Jeffrey Epstein.
Quote:By Ignotus,
To my fellow man:
I came forward with this information bearing no motives other than to have this information public. I did not and do not seek any personal gain from this information whether it be financial or otherwise and will always decline. When I became aware of this moment, I had the same reaction as many of you did. Anger, confusion and sadness. I care not about petty political quarrels and only hope for the best in all of us.
To my fellow ABC News employees:
I’ve walked the halls experiencing similar feelings we are all having right now. All of you regardless of your own personal differences in one form or another do an outstanding job. I sincerely enjoy working with each and every one of you and will continue to do so throughout our careers.
To those wrongfully accused:
It is terrible that you have been lashed out at by the company. I know some may put the burden of guilt on me, but my conscience is clear. The actions of the company towards you are the result of their own and not anyone else. The public outcry, from coast to coast, of all people, creeds, and political affiliations, is clear. I have not one doubt that there will always be support for you, and you will have prosperous careers. For neither you, nor I, have done anything wrong.
To Amy Robach:
You are the only person deserving of an apology. I am most certainly sorry. Not for my actions or for this to center around you, but for what is clear to have happened. When I first stumbled across this, my initial reaction was outrage. But this soon turned towards empathy. I can not imagine doing all the hard work to only have it shelved. If the past few years have taught us anything, it is the truth that some of us have endured many hardships in this industry. From the spiking of stories regarding prominent and powerful people in this world, and to yours. I believe you are an outstanding reporter and have done such tremendous work in the community as well.
To ABC News:
I sit right here with you all in complete shock. I, like many, are at a loss for words on how this has been handled. Instead of addressing this head-on like the company has in the past, it has spun into a mission of seek-and-destroy. Innocent people that have absolutely nothing to do with this are being hunted down as if we are all a sport. I challenge all of you to actually look inwards and remember why this company engages in journalism. We all hold the First Amendment at the foundation of this company, yet forget its history, its purpose, and its reasoning for even coming into existence to begin with. How lost we are… yearning to be found. I went to Project Veritas for the sole reason that any other media outlet else would have probably shelved this as well. I thank all of them, and James, for seeking truth.
We are all human and mortal, creatures of mistakes and redemption.
The road to redemption favors no soul.
11-17-2019, 12:16 PM (This post was last modified: 11-17-2019, 01:10 PM by BIAD.)
Now here's a tip to anyone in the Establishment who needs assistance on shutting down a scandal.
Subtlety is usually a prerequisite when dealing with a taboo-activity and the news-hungry press, but if the
story you're trying to get out from under of has public passion and other information waiting to be exposed,
sometimes it's best to cry out the words that 'those-with-ears-to-listen' will rally to your side immediately.
Remember, Prince Andrew's interview was made at the BBC and broadcast on a Saturday evening at
9.00.pm. and on BBC 2, a lesser-used channel at that particular time. And of course, who funds the BBC?!
And so the man who's ex-wife took £15,000 from Epstein for debt problems, made the call and see if you
can spot the words. It's no accident that the BBC piece left what Prince Andrew said was his alibi until further
down to article. They had to because -like most news outlets, they believe readers only scan the headline
and possibly the first paragraph.
But they knew what he was saying and they knew that it was too direct.
Here we go.
Quote:Prince Andrew 'categorically' denies sex claims.
'The Duke of York has "categorically" denied having any sexual contact with an American woman, who says
she was forced to have sex with him aged 17. Answering questions about his links to convicted sex offender
Jeffrey Epstein in a BBC interview, Prince Andrew said the alleged incidents "never happened".
Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's accusers, claimed she was forced to have sex with the prince three times.
The prince said he was at home with his children on one of the occasions.
Prince Andrew, who is the Queen's third child, has been facing questions for several months over his ties to
Epstein, a 66-year-old American financier who took his own life while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges...'
Up to now, all fairly normal. We don't know who wrote this as the usual Journalist's name is missing under the title,
but you can bet it was heavily edited and checked. Of course, the interview itself was a milktoast formula and real
probing was never even contemplated.
Quote:'...Virginia Giuffre - then called Virginia Roberts - has said she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew between
2001 - when she was 17 - and 2002, in London, New York and Epstein's private island in the US Virgin Islands.
Speaking to BBC Newsnight's Emily Maitlis, the prince said: "It didn't happen. I can absolutely categorically tell you
it never happened."
"I have no recollection of ever meeting this lady, none whatsoever."
He said Ms Giuffre's account of him "profusely sweating" and "pouring with perspiration" when they danced at the club
on the night in 2001 when she says they first had sex was impossible, because he had a medical condition preventing
him from perspiring.
In an extraordinary interview, which you can watch in full on BBC iPlayer in the UK or YouTube elsewhere in the world,
the duke said:
*He had investigations carried out to establish whether a photograph of him with Ms Giuffre was faked, but they were
inconclusive
*He would testify under oath if "push came to shove" and his lawyers advised him to
*He was unaware of an arrest warrant against Epstein when he invited him to Princess Beatrice's 18th birthday party
at Windsor Castle
*He does not regret his friendship with Epstein because of "the opportunities I was given to learn" from him about trade
and business
*Speaking out about his relationship with the financier had become almost "a mental health issue" for him...'
"Unaware of an arrest warrant"..? Do you have any idea the vetting-procedures that goes on just to hold an actual
interview away from a secured area for the Windsors?! And as far as a 'mental health issue' is concerned, the same
broadcasters have had no problems with boasting the military careers of the Royals and their supposed-front-line
activity in conflicts.
But Prince Andrew is playing the victim card and BBC Newsnight host Emily Maitlis is letting him use it.
Quote:'.Addressing Ms Giuffre's claims that she had dined with the prince, danced with him at a nightclub, and went on to have
sex with him at the house of Ghislaine Maxwell, a friend of the prince, in Belgravia, central London, he said "there are a
number of things that are wrong with that story".
He said the date when Ms Giuffre says he had sex with her was 10 March 2001, when he had taken his daughter Beatrice
to Pizza Express in Woking for a party before spending the night at home.
"Going to Pizza Express in Woking is an unusual thing for me to do," he said. "I remember it weirdly distinctly."...'
There it is, there's the call. 'Woking' [pronounced woke-king] and Pizza Express. Anyone from Prince Andrew's many
advisers and those of the BBC with even the slightest interest in what has been slopped across social media recently would've
cautioned him to not use those words.
Yet he did and said them on -allegedly, one of the world's most respected broadcasting companies.
He cannot recall meeting this woman, but he can remember taking his daughter to a food-outlet on that particular day.
Prince Andrew said it was for a party, but what kind of party? Princess Beatrice's birthday is 8th August 1988, which would
have made her 13 years-old in 2001. Ms Giuffre stated that the date of her 'experience' was 10th March, so the visit wasn't
to celebrate her birthday and that the first encounter was at a nightclub, not a place one would go during the day.
Again, what type of security would you think there'd be for the second son of the Queen of England to just 'visit' a eating
-house on the corner of Oaks Road and Goldsworth Road in a town just south of London?
Never mind a light-pulsing busy Disco where Prince Andrew could be kidnapped! These types of activities require checking,
names of employees scrutinised and security agencies involved.
Quote:No memory
Ms Giuffre described him providing her with alcohol at a nightclub, but Prince Andrew said: "I don't drink, I don't think I've ever
bought a drink in Tramps whenever I was there." On claims he was sweating, he said: "I have a peculiar medical condition which
is that I don't sweat or I didn't sweat at the time," he said, blaming it on "an overdose of adrenaline in the Falklands War".
He said he had only started to be able to sweat again "in the recent past".
Asked about a photograph of him and Ms Giuffre being taken at Ghislaine Maxwell's house, he said he had "absolutely no memory"
of it. "Investigations that we've done" have been unable to prove whether the photograph was faked, he said, "because it is a
photograph of a photograph of a photograph".
Prince Andrew said he did not recall going upstairs in that house, said he was not dressed as he usually would be if he was in London
and added "we can't be certain as to whether or not that's my hand". "I'm at a loss to explain this particular photograph," he said...'
Once again, important questions are not asked. Can a member of Royalty just turn up at a nightclub without the property
being first checked for undesirables and then monitored during the visit? Or was it a private function of a particular class-level,
where those attending were of suitable merit and on a special list?
If so, how did Giuffre get in...? Who gave the security agencies the nod that she was okay?!
If you wish to read the rest of the hand-washing, it's in the link below the article, but even for a 59 year-old 'normie' like me,
I can see his obvious cry for assistance. For those in the shadowy world of sexual exploitation for the elites, those words meant
'Shut It Down And Do It Now'.
I dunno, man. I've "overdosed" on adrenaline a number of times, and it's never made me stop sweating...
... but I would say he is correct in announcing that he has recently begun to sweat... probably pretty profusely!
.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.
Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’
11-18-2019, 11:17 AM (This post was last modified: 11-18-2019, 11:17 AM by BIAD.)
(11-17-2019, 11:37 PM)Ninurta Wrote: I dunno, man. I've "overdosed" on adrenaline a number of times, and it's never made me stop sweating...
... but I would say he is correct in announcing that he has recently begun to sweat... probably pretty profusely!
The lack of perspiration could be something to do with the lizard blood he inherited from his mother or
the confident feeling he believed he had as royalty that he couldn't be held accountable.
But now it seems, Prince Andrew is utilising his mammal-side of his body and realising the ones with the
footage of what he did at Epstein's Manhattan mansion, are tugging his chain.
Here is a video from The Phoenix Enigma tearing apart the BBC interview with Prince Andrew.
(@BIAD went over the interview above too. Thank you BIAD. )
Quote:Two corrections officers tasked with guarding Jeffrey Epstein at the time of his suicide are expected to be taken into custody Tuesday, according to sources familiar with the investigation.
The two officers are expected to face charges related to accusations of falsifying prison records at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in lower Manhattan, where Epstein died on Aug. 10 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking.
Both guards were working overtime at the time of the financier’s death and allegedly failed to check on Epstein every half-hour as they were required to do. The charges stem from the duo falsifying forms to claim they’d carried out the required check-ins.
They will appear in Manhattan federal court later Tuesday.
Federal prosecutors offered the corrections officers plea deals, the Associated Press previously reported, but the officers turned them down.
Quote:This is just the beginning of the investigation into his death
The FBI and the US inspector general are continuing to investigate the systemic failures that led to Epstein's death and have subpoenaed dozens more witnesses.
It's unclear how quickly that investigation will proceed. The Department of Justice did not return the ABC's request for comment.
Epstein's victims and US politicians are growing impatient.
Twitter embed
Twitter: Tweet from Gloria Allred: "All those who knowingly assisted and enabled him can and must also be held accountable in both criminal and civil courts of law. We will not stop until the full truth is known and there is justice for the courageous victims of Jeffrey Epstein." View on Twitter
During a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Republican senator Lindsay Graham repeatedly asked the US Bureau of Prisons chief how Epstein managed to kill himself and whether there was any evidence to suggest it was not a suicide.
"With a case this high-profile, there's got to be either a major malfunction in the system or a criminal enterprise at foot to allow this to happen," he said.
He was perhaps referring to the whirl of conspiracy theories stipulating that Epstein was murdered. Medical authorities say there is no doubt Epstein committed suicide, and surveillance footage shows no one accessed the area where his cell was located on the night he died.
What about the sex crimes investigation?
Epstein's death ended the case against him, which could have involved prominent figures including Prince Andrew, who has been accused of having sex with one of Epstein's victims, Virginia Giuffre, when she was 17.
In a BBC interview widely seen as a train wreck, Prince Andrew again denied any knowledge of the incident but that has not stopped calls for him to speak with US investigators about what he does know.
Anna Rothwell, a lawyer at the British Law Firm Corker Binning, told the Times of London Prince Andrew is "not entitled to any form of immunity by virtue of his position as a member of the Royal family," and he would be "vulnerable to extradition".
In a fresh blow to the Duke of York, the Telegraph reports his name also appears in a cache of secret documents detailing new allegations against Epstein.
A judge in the US will reportedly decide before the end of the year whether to unseal the more than 3,000 pages of evidence which formed part of a defamation lawsuit in 2015.
A former masseuse for Jeffrey Epstein who says he raped her on his private island, has provided photos of his secretive Caribbean compound to The Sun.
Chaunte Davies says she was raped by Epstein over the course of several years before finally parting ways with him in 2005. She told the Sun that the wealthy pedophile was arrested just five days after she gave the FBI and New Mexico Assistant Attorney General evidence against him. Epstein receives a massage from assistant Sarah Kellen
Now 40, Chaunte says the ex-Wall Street banker performed a sex act on himself during their first massage session - and that she was "manipulated" into staying in their circle by Epstein's alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell. "Within weeks she was jetting round the world on his private jet and on to his island of Little Saint James," according to the report.
Chaunte Davies, Ghislaine MaxwellChaunte, top left, pictured with other girls on the island
Davies also revealed how Epstein bragged about his friendship with Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, and how Epstein used his relationship with the Duke of York to lure young girls into his orbit - at one point, allegedly having an orgy with Andrew and several young girls.
Quote:In 2015 court testimony, she wrote: “I was around 18 at the time. Epstein, Andy, approximately eight other young girls and I had sex together.”
She said the other girls seemed to be under 18 and “didn’t really speak English”. This seemed to amuse Epstein, she claimed, who said “they are the ‘easiest’ girls to get along with”.
The duke has repeatedly denied the claims, which were later struck from the 2015 case. In his Newsnight interview he said he had “no recollection” of meeting Virginia and has denied any wrongdoing. -The Sun
"I was very aware of Jeffrey Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew and Fergie right away," she said, adding "It was one of several bragging tactics he used to further induce his power and privilege. He bragged a lot."
"He had framed photos of them in his residences. He bragged about how he’d lent money to the duchess."
Quote:Chauntae has demanded that Andrew speak to FBI agents as they move to nail Epstein’s associates.
Andrew insisted last week he had not noticed young girls surrounding Epstein.
But Chauntae said: “I hope he is honest. There is no way you could have been a friend of Jeffrey’s and not know what was going on.
“I don’t see how you could see somebody with another young girl all the time and there never being a conversation about it. It doesn’t add up.” -The Sun
Prince Andrew pictured with accuser Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell
Chaunte also called Andrew's claim that Epstein was guilty of "unbecoming" behavior "pompous," adding "It’s minimalising something that has shattered lives." Andrew, a frequent guest on the island, was named in a lawsuit claiming that girls were forced to have sex with him.
NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.
Quote:Sources say she is set to defend herself and the prince.
She has told pals she thinks the picture of them with Virginia Roberts, who claims she had sex with Andrew when she was 17, may have been doctored.
It was said to have been taken at her London home in March 2001.
A source said: “Like Andrew, she has no memory of it.
“Ghislaine thinks there are a lot of problems with the picture and it is very fishy.
“It is one of very few photos that does not bear a time and date stamp.” -The Sun
Ok Andrew is a piece of sh#t, but I cant but help think he is been used to draw attention away from the child rape muslims have been and are still doing in the citys of the UK.
The same way the BBC tried to paint Cliff Richard as a child rapist to draw notice away from the doings of the muslims
11-26-2019, 12:12 PM (This post was last modified: 11-26-2019, 12:43 PM by BIAD.)
(11-26-2019, 10:53 AM)Wallfire Wrote: Ok Andrew is a piece of sh#t, but I cant but help think he is been used to draw attention away from the child rape
muslims have been and are still doing in the citys of the UK.
The same way the BBC tried to paint Cliff Richard as a child rapist to draw notice away from the doings of the muslims
I think you've got a point there, Wallfire.
It's not dissimilar from the recent machete attacks and injuries around the premier showings of a movie
called 'Blue Story'. The director of the film - Andrew Onwubolu also known as Rapman, (FFS!) reckons
it's a love story when it's obvious that it's about gang-culture dominant in the inner-cities of Great Britain.
This isn't the movie's story, gangs of youths really did arrive with weapons at Birmingham cinemas and the
Police were called when trouble ensued.
The media did report it, but the ethnicity of the gangs was never spoken of, only that the characters in the
movie are predominantly British-born African young men and the offenders in the real world were 'males'
and a female. Article:
The media dare not report the ethnicity of the gangs because it would tie-in with the movie and the how this
culture is nurtured. And it has nothing to to do with the colour of the young people's skins, it's borne from
an embedded background that breeds envy from a position of assumed poverty.
So even though the gang culture -is not only endorsed by making a movie about the phenomena in this current
politically-correct environment, it's also replayed in real-life outside of the cinemas with several Police Officers
and members of the public being injured.
And the culprits...? Not focused on, their behavior that the film was drawn from, not commented on.
The cinema companies initially banned the movie from their showings, but due to the 'hints' that their policy may
be seen as racist, many cinema houses have reinstated it.
.......................
Prince Andrew is the equivalent of the movie, he's the goat that's offered instead of the real discussion
regarding the predominantly Pakistani grooming-gangs that are currently infesting the UK. Their ethnicity
cannot be commented on, only that they're male and have committed an offence.
Their reasons for using females in this manner are never questioned nor is the cultural background reflected
on of where such an oppressive belief-system came from.
No, Prince Andrew is a white male of a high position and just like the virtuous-pretending media, should've known
better.
Epstein's behavior was highly organised and involved logistics that go way beyond the 'normal' settings of some
pervert diddling with kids, but this doesn't give the media the right to focus on the surroundings and fallout of
Epstein's degenerate activities and ignore what is happening today in regards of abusing young females in the
UK.
Yep, Cliff Richard was never accused by the BBC of the allegations because he was white, it was because he
is wealthy and deemed 'better' than the average person. This points to a worrying attitude that brown-skinned
people of a lower-income culture do what they do because they 'can't help it'... that they don't know any better.
![[Image: VJN-UDOh_bigger.png]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1149515833900593154/VJN-UDOh_bigger.png)
![[Image: prince-andrew-interviewed-bbc-data.jpg]](https://www.abc.net.au/cm/lb/11713944/data/prince-andrew-interviewed-bbc-data.jpg)
![[Image: picture-5.jpg?itok=LY4e264-]](https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/thumbnail/public/pictures/picture-5.jpg?itok=LY4e264-){kind=small}
![[Image: epstein%20new%201.png]](https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/epstein%20new%201.png?itok=PQVIJnLJ)
![[Image: chaunte%20ghislaine.png]](https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/chaunte%20ghislaine.png?itok=bhkHZZB2)
![[Image: epstein%20new%203.png]](https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/epstein%20new%203.png?itok=okBU7vOu)
![[Image: andrew%20epstein_1.jpg]](https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/andrew%20epstein_1.jpg?itok=KrW9LYI9)
![[Image: maxwell%20andrew_0.jpg]](https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/maxwell%20andrew_0.jpg?itok=-zVHynEU)
![[Image: island%20building%20epstein.jpg]](https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/island%20building%20epstein.jpg?itok=lLZTAhKK)
![[Image: epstein%20new%205.png]](https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/epstein%20new%205.png?itok=BVoXFVjS)
![[Image: epstein%20maxwell%201995_0.png]](https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/epstein%20maxwell%201995_0.png?itok=gI9ndja8)