Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Obama Fires A Climate Change Doubter!
#1
Energy Dept. Defends Obama’s Climate Action Plan By Firing Honest Scientist.

'Department of Energy (DOE) officials withheld information from Congress to advance
President Barack Obama’s Climate Action Plan and fired an employee who honestly
and thoroughly answered legislative staff’s questions, a congressional committee
investigation found.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=955]

DOE officials, including Noelle Metting, met with staff from the House Science, Space
and Technology and Senate Energy and Natural Resources committees in October 2014
to discuss pending legislation the agency opposed.

DOE wanted to suppress information to kill support for the bill, science committee
Republicans revealed in a report Tuesday.

Metting was later fired because she “refused to conform to [DOE management’s]
predetermined remarks” and provided “candid and complete information” in response
to the committees’ questions, the report said...'
SOURCE:


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#2
Thankfully SOON, This Supposedly, Honest and Transparent Administration of Thugs and Crooks well be All Fired Soon!
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#3
Obama is GONE and a New Sheriff is in Charge! Now the Faked Data cam be Exposed!
Quote:NASA / NOAA Climate Data Is Fake Data
Posted on February 4, 2017 by tonyheller

NOAA shows the Earth red hot in December, with record heat in central Africa.
[Image: 201612-4-768x601.gif]
Quote:The map above is fake. NOAA almost no temperature data from Africa, and none from central Africa. They simply made up the record temperatures.
[Image: 201612-land-4-768x601.gif]
[Image: 122016.gif]
Quote:Gavin Schmidt at NASA claims the imaginary NOAA data has been replicated by many other institutions.
[Image: Screen-Shot-2017-02-04-at-11.15.59-AM.gif]
Quote:However, when Gavin is confronted about his obviously bogus temperature graphs, he defends by saying “it is not my data, I get from NOAA.” In fact, all of the supposedly independent agencies get the lion’s share of their data from NOAA.
[Image: Screen-Shot-2016-11-21-at-1.55.15-AM.gif]
Quote:NASA and NOAA are engaged in the biggest fraud in science history, and this needs to end now that criminals are no longer in control of our government. Under the Trump administration, government employees stand to make huge amounts of money by whistleblowing fraud. Contact Kent Clizbe for details.
Source

Climate Change Supporters, Your Free Meal Ticket Is OVER!
Real Change is Coming! 
Yes in other world, Find A New Job!
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#4
The Truth is out There!
More Evidence has been released, Yes Climate Change Is A SCAM!

Quote:Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data 

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.
 If you're interested, read the rest of this article here: Source
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#5
(02-06-2017, 01:45 PM)guohua Wrote: The Truth is out There!
More Evidence has been released, Yes Climate Change Is A SCAM!
The way I see it, Guohua, is that if there was anything to climate change, then we as a
species would have stopped doing it twenty years-ago. Just stopped making it happen.

There's no need for nuances or careful wordings, there's no need to look at the impact
to the economies of countries, you just stop making it happen.

If there's a problem with releasing carbon and it's supposed to be a bad thing for the
planet and those existing on it, a sane and mature individual, a group or to put it properly,
that same whole planet would just stop doing it.

It wouldn't be a case of decreasing the output, it wouldn't be a case of creating a market
where one's carbon amount could be sold or exchanged, the potential to expose carbon
into the atmosphere wouldn't alter just because you've sold your 'calculated' dangerous
amount!

Forming groups and discussing how to approach the situation -a tactic that has been going
on for at least fifteen years that I know of, hasn't stopped all of the industries in all the
countries from doing it.

Wars cause many of incidents of carbon exposure, yet it's deemed that deliberately poisoning
the planet in this method is far-more important than the demand not to do it.

People are nursed into believing that they need many of the products that are for sale in the
world market and it's perceived that those who own conglomerates, have monopolies on certain
markets and are influential in global political circles, are the same ones who have major concerns
regarding this dangerous pollution.

Yet they haven't stopped making the products and their assumed concerns haven't forced them to.

If the rational question is 'if you're to ensure the next generations had a habitable planet
to live on, would you go with having no job, no money, no food, no utilities, vehicle or
basically go without access to everything you're accustomed to?

Then seriously, why haven't we been asked it...? and I'll take a guess that the answer to why we
haven't been confronted with this supposed stark reality and why this whole climate change subject
has arisen, is the same on both accounts.

Money.
So it goes under the heading 'Bullshit'
minusculethumbsup

Edit: Put it this way, if a guy selling double-glazing tells you it's better to have your
house double-glazed for a multitude of viable reasons, it's not because HE wants to
feel better living in your house and it's not because he's worried about you.
It's about a sale.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)