Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com) +-- Forum: Controversy and Debate (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-19.html) +--- Forum: Hot Button Issues (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-21.html) +--- Thread: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? (/thread-7665.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - Mystic Wanderer - 07-07-2021 (07-07-2021, 04:07 AM)senona Wrote: Coming soon to a neighborhood near you! @"senona", feels like the CCP has it's hands all over this, right? Forcing vaccinations, targeting people who don't comply, etc. Yeah, the Democrat label is just another name for Communist China now. RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - Ninurta - 07-07-2021 (07-07-2021, 04:07 AM)senona Wrote: Coming soon to a neighborhood near you! Yeah, I saw BidenHarris himself on TV this evening talking about his "neighborhood by neighborhood outreach" and a door to door campaign. I thought then - and I may have thought it out loud, but who the hell listens to me anyhow? - "You tryin' to get a lot of people shot? 'Cause that's a great way to get shot around here!" I'm getting worn out with the goddamned Health Service spamming my phone with text reminders to "get the jab, buddy", and I'm pretty sure I'd lose my ever-lovin' shit if they started coming around and knocking at my door, too. Maybe I just need to put a sign up that says "COVID quarantine, and if you can read this, you've already been ranged in for defensive measures." Do you think that might discourage them as the look at the thick forest surrounding them on their way up my drive? maybe give 'em second thoughts? . RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - Michigan Swamp Buck - 07-07-2021 From BIAD's post . . . Quote:As well as overt warnings about the danger of the virus, the Government has been accused of feeding the public a non-stop diet of bad news, such as deaths and hospitalisations, without ever putting the figures in context with news of how many people have recovered, or whether daily death tolls are above or below seasonal averages. I've noticed how certain information has been omitted from the reports, like the immunity of those who recovered should be added to the total number of herd immunity but aren't, it's just those vaccinated who count. I've also noticed that reports made by scientists and other professionals that do address missing information are censored and accused of being false or misleading. Even some official sources like the NIH, CDC, WHO, and FDA have information that is buried, information that they make up excuses for why it is irrelevant. Not like that makes any difference, many reports that have used official sources for this missing information are still characterized as false and misleading and censored from the public. Add to that the contradictions and flip flopping of officials (Fauci, politicians, experts, etc.) and these organizations and I can't bring myself to believe any information I haven't researched and dug deeply for on my own. RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - ABNARTY - 07-07-2021 (07-07-2021, 04:07 AM)senona Wrote: Coming soon to a neighborhood near you! This whole door-to-door thing is astounding. Who is going to do it? Who pays them to do it? What happens when someone going door-to-door gets shot at or harmed in some way? When was the last time the government went door-to-door for anything? Yes I know the census but that is Constitutional. RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - BIAD - 07-07-2021 (07-07-2021, 12:42 PM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: From BIAD's post . . . That's the thing that astonished me, the scale of the scheme and the amount of organisations involved. Google suppresses any counter -information about the Coof and the different medical suggestions to help the public. The news media all sing the same song, yet totally change last week's assurances without a care that this week's tune conflicts with what they previously said and the Governments speak gravelly about concerns for the public, yet flaunt their disregard to that same public. Science -the firebrand they were so proud of, is now a joke and even though the payments will continue to maintain the narrative, the public have stopped fearfully worshipping at their alter. And we're not talking nuances here... "Kay Burley off air at Sky News for six months over Covid rule breach Other news team members Beth Rigby and Inzamam Rashid agree to three months off air" "Exclusive: Government scientist Neil Ferguson resigns after breaking lockdown rules to meet his married lover Prof Ferguson allowed the woman to visit him at home during the lockdown while lecturing the public on the need for strict social distancing" "No 10 says G7 summit not to blame for rise in Cornwall’s Covid cases Rates have gone up in Carbis Bay where event was held; however, surge in county is blamed on several factors" "Hancock's former neighbour won Covid test kit work after WhatsApp message "Pub landlord celebrated lucrative Covid contract by buying £1.3m country manor" They know the realities of the scheme they've concocted, they know of the benefits of maintaining the social control and they know that the damage they're doing to the eternal perception that was created to put such people on pedestals, will be sold once again to the public at a later date. Take the first one. Kay Burley works as a Presenter for Sky News in the UK. I think we can say she would have access to the facts of the Covid and if they aligned with the crap they sling at their viewers daily, one would find it difficult to rationalise why this woman would organise a birthday party in the middle of a lockdown and Tier-2-related curfew in England. Yet there she was with fellow Sky Journalists, drinking in the Century Club -London until 11.00pm, then a late-night meal at the fashionable 'Folie' restaurant and then back for some more booze with a small group back at her five-bedroom West-London house. (Not her cottage in the Cotswolds). Social-distancing...? No. (neither was any of the other patrons in the exclusive nightclub) Masks...? Don't be silly. Hugging...? Of course. Adhering to any of the other warnings the thousands of TV Presenters shout at the public every day...? Are you for real?!! It's a virus that is mutating to stay alive, it's poorly duplicating itself and adapting to its situation. On the mainland, we older-folk used to call it flu and for those already with ailments, it can add to their respective dilemmas. But it doesn't warrant the fear-porn that is vomited to us... unless that fear-porn itself has another reason for be disseminated. By the way, to make sure I spelled 'disseminated' correctly, I Googled it. What do you think the meaning is now? To spread something? To import a meaning? To widely proclaim? No... Google says: "disseminated = adjective MEDICINE having spread throughout an organ or the body. "symptoms vary from mild localized disease to severe disseminated infection" Strange, huh?! The media are dying and for many not in the cyber-world, that will come as a shock. Trump carried them for four years and the 'rona helped them for almost two years more. If the Ufo-scare fails -and it will, the MSM will struggle to not only maintain their hold the reality they've displayed for a very long time, they will lose something they've held dear for the same duration. Power. Statistics are great, they're neutral and have no smarmy face. Nobody argues with numbers, to not understand basic math means you're a dummy... somebody who should be told what to do and not tell others. Enter TV Pundits and Journalists, stage-left. RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - Ninurta - 07-07-2021 (07-07-2021, 01:22 PM)ABNARTY Wrote: This whole door-to-door thing is astounding. Who is going to do it? Who pays them to do it? What happens when someone going door-to-door gets shot at or harmed in some way? 1934, I believe. In Germany. . RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - BIAD - 07-08-2021 This week (5th July) the usual pundits were rolled out on television to convince the public that by agreeing with the media in supporting the idea of eternal face-nappies and hanging onto every word the media says, the world will be saved from the trending -but fading, flu. In the UK, there's always a mixture of ethnicity within these panels, but there's one thing connects them all. A pushed assumption that these confident, accentuated voices belong to experts. During the recent society-controlled scare-demic, it has been medical officials assuring an assmed terrified public that the Coof is a killer (when in reality, it can be a serious contributor to death by negatively effecting prevailing physical conditions) and as time moved on, other medically-orientated cerebs appeared on the screens around Britain to advise them on this mysterious bat-related virus. (Except no bat has ever been found with this virus.) The only problem is -when dealing with the ongoing ratings-squabbles between broadcast companies, is the urgency to have authoritative figures admonishing the public of their ignorance can sometimes draw less-advertised beliefs from the person who tells you that a mask isn't just for Christmas. On the British ITV television channel, there's a morning news/entertainment programme titled 'Good Morning Britain' (GMB), where two Presenters offer debatable topics relevant to current news. Piers Morgan was one of the hosts until he walked-off during a racial discussion. Now the show has a weekly guest-host who accompanies the regular other-half of the presentations. As said, this week it was someone familiar to British television audiences and had his own long-running series of interviewing programmes. However, Richard Madeley asked a question to a Professor that is normally kept away from the public's perception of academic autocrats. Quote:GMB row ensues as Richard Madeley asks professor about communist beliefsArchived Express Article: What I'm wondering is why this woman is a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) that supposedly recommends to the British Government appropriate ways of dealing with national medical problem? The Coof is a physical disease, isn't it...? What needs does Susan Mitchie serve as a Behavioural analyst in a time when fully-untested drugs are being pumped into the arms of the frightened? And a keen Communist -to boot! Just food for thought. Quote:Michie is Professor of Health Psychology and Director of the Centre for Behaviour Change at UCL, so prima facie she has theGuido Fawkes: ...................................................... On another note, the Bots are busy helping the narrative! RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - Ninurta - 07-09-2021 (07-08-2021, 09:30 AM)BIAD Wrote: As said, this week it was someone familiar to British television audiences and had his own long-running series of interviewing So. You know, that sounds suspiciously like a propaganda campaign. It appears to me to be an effort to "normalize" communism and make it more palatable to the general public. Humans are herd beasts, and if they believe everyone else is going to run off the cliff... In other news, since when is a "Professor of Health Psychology" qualified to speak on MEDICAL matters? Since when are they even a scientist? There is little to nothing in psychology that is related to science. Psychology is mostly voodoo trying to masquerade as science. My first wife was a PhD in Psychology (got her PhD after we split, was only at Masters level before), and did at times attempt science in doing animal experiments, but her experiments were much more closely related to Neurology than to Psychology. She was trying to figure out how brains work. Brains, NOT minds, which are much more insubstantial than brains. You can poke a brain with your finger, but you can't poke a mind with it. Asking a Psychologist a medical opinion is like getting an estimate to have a new roof put on your house from an auto mechanic. The mechanic may be great at what he does, but roofing is NOT what he does, so his opinion carries quite a lot less weight in roofing and carpentry matters than it would in automotive matters. "Science" used to start with a question, and then through experimentation come to a conclusion that answered it. Since the Left took over science, now it starts with the answer, and tries to find enough supporting evidence - even if they have to make it up - to confirm that preconceived conclusion. It's exactly bass ackwards now... ... but Psychology has ALWAYS been like that. I will also note that there is an old saying regarding Professors - "Them that can, do. Them that can't, teach." Under Socialist and Communist regimes, EVERYTHING is colored by the edicts of the Party. "Scientists" must find "conclusions" that support the edicts of the Party. Therefore, the politics of a communist "scientist" are ALWAYS relevant to their conclusions. Especially the fakest scientists, Psychologists. It was entirely proper to question just how much the Party had colored Ms. Michie's conclusions. Personally, I would have also gone even further, and questioned her credentials and expertise to assess concrete questions when her "science" is not a concrete science. Instead, the person questioning her politics and qualifications got dog piled by commie-bots, all in an effort to make the general public think that it thinks other than how it does. Classic. So who would go to that kind of effort to normalize communism and make it more palatable? What government is composed of communists with deep pockets? What does the middle "C" in "CCP" stand for? It's a patently transparent attempt to promote communism using presumed "science" as a smoke screen, science that is not science at all, but since we call it science, the unfaithful dare not question it's conclusions... ,,, because The Party has spoken! . RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - F2d5thCav - 07-09-2021 Any of the radical political ideologies influence EVERYTHING their followers do. That is why I can't trust Merkel and I didn't trust Ratzinger (the Pope who was a former Hitler Youth). That is why I reject the agenda of globalists-progressives. OF COURSE this "scientist" believes in state control of everything. She has lived and breathed that system of belief for forty years. For Christ's sake. Cheers RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - BIAD - 07-09-2021 (07-09-2021, 04:23 AM)Ninurta Wrote: "Science" used to start with a question, and then through experimentation come to a conclusion that answered it. It's a terrible realisation when you see the whole chess board and have to decide whether some people have been duped into believing the words of today's version of 'Polito-science' or are small deliberate cogs in the scheme to bring the public to heel. I've seen such behaviour in my past and it's a real eye-opener. People that you accept as fairly trustworthy, who you work with and occasionally spend time with outside of the employment realm. Many years ago, the company I worked for decided to use a business called 'Winning Edge' an agency that explains stuff that I'd expect any average adult would already understand. £300 ($413)-per-head bought you a couple of hours of one's employees sitting in a room listening to some dick-head asking stupid questions whilst pointing at a whiteboard. Questions like: if there were a million bucks on the other-side of a ravine and the only way across was a four-inch wide plank, would you dare cross and what would sort of mind-set would you require?! When my Manager (I was working at a desk then) came to me and told me it was my turn to listen to this foolishness, I told him no. I'd known him for years and even though I'd accepted his incorrect perception about me when I was emptying trash, etc during my time as a Janitor, I'd always thought he'd never considered me as a ignoramus. Then other work colleagues appeared and ask me why I refused to go. It was time away from work -usually a notion that would cater for the most reluctant of employees. Was the concept to high to grasp..? one guy asked me and again, I put his question down to to his preconceived assumption that anyone who cleans out toilets and empty trash cans is somehow feebleminded. At one point, four people -a quartet of folks I'd considered as amicable co-workers, stood around me with requests to explain my refusal. So I told them. I explained that I didn't enjoy wasting my time on fundamentals that -really, any decent parent would have already given to their offspring during their growth. I explained that during this time that the company was uncertain of its future -and even though this may indirectly or directly effect my own time with them, I believed it was an avoidable waste of resources that may impact all of us in that department. There were other reasons, but my main concern were their concerns on my veto to attend the in-house venue. I asked them why they put so-much store in my unwillingness to 'join in' with their group-think, why a business like 'Winning Edge' would cater for them individually or as a group and what possible knowledge I could gain at my time of life that would enhance my position in a company on the edge of selling itself to another or even just closing. It arose later that this 'success-orientated attitude' business was denied by the company that eventually purchased us. The reasons...? because those who'd heavily invested in the newly-purchased newspaper found it a waste of time and money. Go figure! But that one question remained unanswered. Why did these work-colleagues look at me as an outcast from their thinking in a situation that didn't -in my opinion, require such examination? I can only thank BIAD for his wise words that he once imparted to me: "The likelihood of one individual being right increases in direct proportion to the intensity with which others are trying to prove him wrong." ............................................................................................ Keeping with the idea of a a single-voice singing a united narrative, I'll use Ninurta's comment of: 'In other news'! In other news, The BBC interviewed someone from the directorate -that used to fund them, on the latest news about the sniffles-plague. I don't have a cell-phone (gah!) and therefore unfamiliar with its uses. But I do know its generally used as a camera. (I'm talking about you, TikTok) I had heard about some miracle software program called an 'App', but I had no idea how invasive they can be. The article below told me that the National Health Service App (that's not what it is, but that's the bullshit-name they're going with) is to be altered due to the 19th July lifting of the Covid-connected restrictions in England. But the explanation to what this computer program does left me speechless...! I mean, it's basically a dog-collar that a user voluntarily fastens down their liberty with! The Mitchie-psychologist-woman must be rubbing her thighs in excitement at the Pavlov-esque experiment! Take a read. Quote:NHS Covid app may change as rules change, Grant Shapps saysArchived BBC Article: RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - F2d5thCav - 07-09-2021 @"BIAD" Quote:But that one question remained unanswered. Why did these work-colleagues look at me as an outcast from their thinking in a situation that didn't -in my opinion, require such examination? The herd always bleats nervously when the collective realizes there is an individual among them. "dick head", yeah. My favorite were all of the damn schemes to improve efficiency; six-sigma my foot. What a bunch of bullshit and a huge waste of money. But people loved getting the certifications and the management loved making it a requirement to do so. Cheers RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - Mystic Wanderer - 07-09-2021 @"BIAD" Quote:I can only thank BIAD for his wise words that he once imparted to me: I'm going to print this out and share it all over social media. Who said that, so I can give credit? (I know it wasn't BIAD, but don't tell him I'm on to him.) Heaven Can Wait (1978), screenplay by Elaine May and Warren Beatty, based on a play by Harry Segall. Was it Elaine, or Warren, or someone else? RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - BIAD - 07-09-2021 (07-09-2021, 05:53 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: @"BIAD" It was James Mason's character and friend to BIAD, 'Mr. Jordan' RE: Is the ‘Delta Variant’ a Hoax? - Mystic Wanderer - 07-09-2021 This guy paints a not so very rosy picture for those who took the jab. This makes me very sad for my friends here, and in my family who took it. Quote:Jim Stone- "if you get exposed to the virus after getting the jab or get a third jab your immune system is going to eat your veins and you'll totally clot out. Your veins contain a clotting agent that gets released when they get injured (to stop the bleeding) and when your immune system starts eating the veins from the inside out, you'll clot up and that will be the end of that." [color=var(--color_brand)]https://www.[/color]bitchute.com/video/QKZca9tTSgrk/ |