Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com) +-- Forum: The Conspiracy Corner (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-35.html) +--- Forum: Cryptozoology (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-39.html) +--- Thread: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 (/thread-6906.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - guohua - 12-18-2020 HI, we have some Cryptid threads going on and I my husband watches this you-tuber. Here is a couple from his channel. Maybe once our Australian members come around, they'll have something to say. RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Moonmagic - 12-18-2020 Now there is a topic I never really read about before, in Australia anyway. Thanks @"guohua" RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - guohua - 12-18-2020 (12-18-2020, 11:42 PM)Moonmagic Wrote: Now there is a topic I never really read about before, in Australia anyway. You're Very Welcome. RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Schmoe1 - 12-18-2020 Will watch later, but damn, as if Australia needs cryptids on top of all the other shit that will kill you there RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - drussell41 - 12-19-2020 (12-18-2020, 11:59 PM)Schmoe1 Wrote: Will watch later, but damn, as if Australia needs cryptids on top of all the other shit that will kill you there No joke. RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - hutch622 - 12-19-2020 (12-18-2020, 09:26 PM)guohua Wrote: HI, we have some Cryptid threads going on and I my husband watches this you-tuber.Australia is a big place with not a lot of people so plenty of places to not be seen . Im giving half these cryptids a chance of being real . RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - NightskyeB4Dawn - 12-19-2020 I find it interesting that all aboriginal history, from everywhere in the world, has stories of human/animal beings. It makes me wonder if our egos and our belief in our superior intelligence may be helping us miss what may be right in front of our faces. I think we should take a lot closer, and less bigoted look at what the oldest and greatest civilization have to say about it. RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Bally002 - 12-19-2020 That was a good watch. A couple there I had no knowledge about. Learnt something. Considering they reckon the aboriginal culture extends back 40,000 years then some stories of creatures, whether passed in story telling, song or painting is credible. Who knows what other odd animals were about back then. I have one song here at home written out for my daughter (5 at the time) when she went to an aboriginal school in the Tanami while we lived there (20 years ago). The song relates to a crashed UFO and the subsequent description of the being recovered from the wreckage. They said it's a true story. Kind regards, Bally :) RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Ninurta - 12-22-2020 I have a friend who was some sort of ranger in Australia. He lived in Albany, but roamed the Outback. He told me once that some tribal elders showed him a bird's wing feather that was around 4 feet long. Australia is a big place, that still has a lot of empty places, There might be "things" still out there. . RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - NightskyeB4Dawn - 12-22-2020 (12-22-2020, 07:42 AM)Ninurta Wrote: I have a friend who was some sort of ranger in Australia. He lived in Albany, but roamed the Outback. He told me once that some tribal elders showed him a bird's wing feather that was around 4 feet long. We hear often of overpopulation, but there are still huge expanses of unpopulated land on this planet. I am sure there are many living things still out there that are smart enough to stay hidden from man. RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - BIAD - 11-22-2021 The latest 'Cryptid' from Down-Under! Quote:I was stalked by terrifying ‘dog man’ monster in Aussie bush and have picture ‘proof’, bloke bizarrely claimsArchived Sun Source: RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Ninurta - 11-22-2021 Maybe it's my old eyes, but I just can't form a dog, or a man, or a dog-man out of that shadow in the bushes. On the other hand, I wasn't aware that dog-men were a thing elsewhere beyond North America, the British movie "Dog Soldiers" notwithstanding.. I need to get out more. . RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Bally002 - 11-23-2021 (11-22-2021, 11:20 PM)BIAD Wrote: The latest 'Cryptid' from Down-Under! Cheers for the update. I tried doing a bit of research on this. Would like to know the location, river and nearby localities. I can't make the object out. We have very large grey male kangaroos where I live. Some stand head and shoulders above most. Not common but do see them, even on my selection, every now and then. I'll get ribbed for this, but, have on occasions seen large deer. (Not native here). After the fires here 2 years ago a lot of fences burnt. Loads of cattle and stray horses coursed through the area and now the bush has regenerated you occasionally see them in the bush. Big wild buggers. During my research I can across an Aussie U-tube site named "Where's my Yowie" . Never heard of it. Mentioned an incident back in the years of a wild thing seen in the bush at my locality, Nymboida NSW. Made the local rag back them. Seems locals back then dismissed it as a large roo. I can say I have come across a large buck roo in the shallows of the creek on my driveway. Although very close we stopped and stared at each other. He stood head and shoulders above me. I backed away cause they an get angry when protecting females. Thanks, I'll keep looking for this dog man location. Kind regards, Bally :) RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - BIAD - 11-23-2021 (11-23-2021, 09:16 AM)Bally002 Wrote: Thanks, I'll keep looking for this dog man location. One of the main problems is the media take these sightings as a joke -even though they are fully aware of their potency with their readers. Often, a mundane political story gets past over by the reader/viewer for a more upbeat article as the one above, but because of lack of MSM background investigation and fear of ridicule, it's merely tossed in like many unusual tales that the public offer and delivered with a tongue-in-cheek aspect to the writing. And due to the clamour for ratings and sales, hard-headed facts like location, dates and names are forgotten... important features that would not only give credibility to an article, but also give the impression of trust from the reader to the medium such stories are acquired. Sadly, the cake is lost because it's believed the public only want the icing! RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - kdog - 11-24-2021 What ever it is, or they are, they are humanoid. Actually smarter then us because they can live off the land and remain hidden. They are one with the Earth, much as dolphins are. We, as humans, need technology to survive, where as they don't. I know, crazy thinking, or is it? RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - BIAD - 11-24-2021 (11-24-2021, 11:37 AM)kdog Wrote: What ever it is, or they are, they are humanoid. I agree. If it's accepted these things exist, their continued existence is based on far-more than just an intelligence similar-or better, than humans. The beings we call 'Bigfoot' don't 'survive' out in the forests, that's our term that we perceive them as and this compounds an assumption that they are animal-like. With a shaggy outer-coating, a lack of what we would accept as a domicile and an assumed failure to use fire, degrades the idea that they are 'enlightened' in the manner we accept. Humans tend to think that if no animal wear clothes, they therefore are lower in the ability to acquire and apply knowledge along with skills. But if comfort or protection from the elements is so important in survival, why do some birds not migrate to warmer climes...? Why do sea-creatures not bask in equatorial waters throughout the year? In the animal kingdom, food is top of the list along with procreation. So naturally, animals will -at times during functions to succeed in these needs, come into contact with humans. This is deemed opportunistic and holds no long-term planning or engrained principle. If avoidence with humans is paramount in their continuation as a species, the clues to human presence can quickly be merged into a collection on a very base level. But does a falcon avoid being seen by a human? Does a whale flee from the sound of a human swimming in its domain? No. The simple answer is they don't trust us, a sign of intelligence far beyond the animalistic alarms of danger. It indicates a virtue within the Bigfoot species that derives from self-awareness that we -only, believe we possess. We've convinced ourselves that man came from ape and any side-branches died-out because we either destroyed them or they just weren't good enough to survive. We construct, we destroy, we invade, we conquer. We pretend to be guardians of the planet and we do it alone because we walk upright and contemplate the atom. Imagine if -contraptions and machines aside, another species knows what we think of ourselves and uses it to remain hidden. It's not about trail-cams or listening devices, these are just implements that humans use. It's the very presence that a human has ventured into their area that is significant to them. We're noisy, we perceive the world from our position and ergo, incapable of putting ourselves in their large shoes! They make 'mistakes' just like we do, but their inquisitiveness is soundly bridled by the belief that their freedom would be lost by making themselves known. Now how could such a conviction be absorbed into an entire species unless it was part of their natural continuation? They know us and they know what we can do to them. An animal doesn't think on that level. RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - BIAD - 12-15-2021 As the media quietly moves into the Christmas period of using up non-time-sensitive stories, The Sun and others report on a 4th December incident with a Yowie that seems to have taken ten days to surface. Quote:YOW-ZER We were confronted by a Bigfoot-like ‘Yowie’ apeman on our way home from work –it was absolutely terrifyingThe Sun: RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Ninurta - 12-15-2021 (11-24-2021, 01:27 PM)BIAD Wrote:(11-24-2021, 11:37 AM)kdog Wrote: What ever it is, or they are, they are humanoid. You are correct in putting 'survive' in quotes. They don't "survive" in the wilderness, they "live" there - just as surely as we live in our houses, rather than merely "survive" in them. I'm not so sure they are entirely devoid of technology, though. My son sent me the following photos from his patch in West Virginia. He is of the opinion that the marks were created by a Bigfoot living in his world. The marks appear to me to have been made by an axe, but they are too far off the ground to have been made by a man with an axe. My son, in the photo, is 6' 6" tall, putting the marks around 8 or 9 feet off the ground. note that the marks are horizontal, rather than angled as a man with an axe would have left at that height. Now, I'm not saying that Bigfoot went down to Home Depot and bought an axe. It could have been a stone axe, like a hand axe, or a stolen iron axe from one of the homesteads around there - But I am as sure as can be that the marks were made by some sort of axe, and that they are at the wrong angle for a normal sized human to make at that distance from the ground. . RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - BIAD - 12-15-2021 (12-15-2021, 10:49 AM)Ninurta Wrote: ...Now, I'm not saying that Bigfoot went down to Home Depot and bought an axe. It could be the latter, an axe taken or found that came from humans. This doesn't imply a lack of tool-making on their part, but is a suggestion based on how we would think if such a need arises. We wouldn't create a tool from scratch, we would acquire it based on availability, then why wouldn't they just do the same? I believe that there are many obstacles we need to overcome to be able to grasp what these things are. For instance, the lack of a physical body or down-right visual evidence causes the current balance of how we communally perceive the Sasquatch. When we say 'Bigfoot', the topic falls into the category of a silly folklore and yet, the title 'Sasquatch' demands a respect -not because of the creature possibly existing, but due to the term deriving from Native Americans and some strange inner -guilt that their legends and current accounts of a hairy North American biped cannot be aligned. But that aside, the lack of accepted evidence leads humans to three obvious conclusions. Two are the usual ones and third rarely touched because of the outlandish idea that what we presume the animal kingdom is, might not be. 1. There's no positive evidence of Bigfoot because it doesn't exist. The standard position and based on a rational assumption. Humans falsify for gain and I don't think we need to belabour the obvious. 2. The public believe the science that there were branches in the human evolution (notice it's 'Human' and belongs to us!) But the same guys tell us they all died-out because of this same process. Evolving drops previous traits for better ones and since man is deemed the result of this constant changing (that has somehow stopped with us?!), the ones who came before just faded away because we-today, are the result of natural selection. 3. The notion that no other creature on this planet holds the essence that we call 'humanity'. It is accepted that we are the only ones that have moral awareness and knowing what is right-and-wrong for more than oneself. If a creature hides, it is because it fears for its life and not because it fears mankind. Sasquatch does not embrace betterment, does not seek the comforts we enjoy and does not display a conscience to a deity. Therefore, with no modern bones in the ground to find, no self-awareness to step out of the forest and greet us an equal and a behaviour not too dissimilar to animals, it cannot exist. But when placed the category of animal, we can say that science looked for it and failed to find it. But I believe the Sasquatch exist and what I also believe is they don't avoid us, in general they've shunned us. RE: Cryptids of Australia pt:1 & pt:2 - Ninurta - 12-15-2021 (12-15-2021, 06:02 PM)BIAD Wrote: But I believe the Sasquatch exist and what I also believe is they don't avoid us, in general they've shunned us. You may be on to something there - on balance, I wouldn't admit to being related to me! . |