NESSIE is BACK! - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com) +-- Forum: The Conspiracy Corner (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-35.html) +--- Forum: Cryptozoology (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-39.html) +--- Thread: NESSIE is BACK! (/thread-6563.html) |
RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Ninurta - 09-26-2021 . One more post, for the last image. . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Ninurta - 09-26-2021 . . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - guohua - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 12:51 AM)Ninurta Wrote: . Looks DAMN Real To me! @"Ninurta" Very Well Done. RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Ninurta - 09-26-2021 It looks like it has a large, barrel-shaped body, a thick stubby tail, and a long neck-like appendage at the forward end. It looks to be on the same general shape plan as a Tully Monster from the Carboniferous period to me, except Tully Monsters maxed out at about 14 inches, not 14 feet, much less the 28 foot length of this object, and Tully Monsters are supposed to have died out 300 million years ago. . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Ninurta - 09-26-2021 I managed to get the frames strung into a GIF. I had to reduce the frame size to 300 X 300 to get it under 500kb to fit on RN3, so the detail is not as good as the originals, but you can still see the motions I'm talking about in the GIFm the rising from the depths and moving towards the shore against the wave motion. . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - guohua - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 01:52 AM)Ninurta Wrote: I managed to get the frames strung into a GIF. I had to reduce the frame size to 300 X 300 to get it under 500kb to fit on RN3, so the detail is not as good as the originals, but you can still see the motions I'm talking about in the GIFm the rising from the depths and moving towards the shore against the wave motion. You have done a Fantastic Job with only those pictures. I don't know what to say, except @"Ninurta" RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Ninurta - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 04:04 AM)guohua Wrote:(09-26-2021, 01:52 AM)Ninurta Wrote: I managed to get the frames strung into a GIF. I had to reduce the frame size to 300 X 300 to get it under 500kb to fit on RN3, so the detail is not as good as the originals, but you can still see the motions I'm talking about in the GIF, the rising from the depths and moving towards the shore against the wave motion. I posted the full size 600 X600 GIF to the New York Post Twitter feed on the story here, because the NYP just posted a single still, and not the best one at that, and everyone was saying "I can't see it" or "it's a tree" or "how is that wave any different from the thousand other waves?". Now lets just see if anyone picks it up and runs across the internet with it. Remember - you saw it here first! . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Kenzo - 09-26-2021 Wow nice work Ninurta , it does look Nessie . I dont know about CGI enough to say is it possible to generate that kind of " monster" to that video ? RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Kenzo - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 12:42 AM)Ninurta Wrote: Aiight. The lenght you measure is near what it says in this article , A Brief History of the Loch Ness Monster Quote:The Spicers described the creature’s body as nearly four feet tall and 25 feet long, plus a long, “undulating” 10- or 12-foot neck RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Bally002 - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 01:52 AM)Ninurta Wrote: I managed to get the frames strung into a GIF. I had to reduce the frame size to 300 X 300 to get it under 500kb to fit on RN3, so the detail is not as good as the originals, but you can still see the motions I'm talking about in the GIFm the rising from the depths and moving towards the shore against the wave motion. That's really cool what you did there. For me the subject certainly looks live. Kinda reminds me of a croc swimming backwards. And I know there are no crocs in the loch. I've seen large crocs sliding backwards into the billabongs while fishing. In saying that I've never seen anything like this. Kind regards, Bally. :) RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Ninurta - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 05:40 AM)Kenzo Wrote: Wow nice work Ninurta , it does look Nessie . Nearly anything is possible with CGI, but I have to wonder why someone would go to all that trouble to generate it, then hide it in 10 seconds of a long video with another focus, then post it and wait for someone else to notice it in that short piece of a long video. So yes, it's possible, but no, I don't think that's what it is. It's possible that it could be a submerged tree moving in a current under the surface that goes counter to the wind direction that is causing the waves. If that is the case, it certainly has an odd shape, but it's possible if, for instance, a tree got struck by lightning and then what was left of it fell into the water. If so, it's a big-'un. I've not measured the width of the trunk, but just eyeballing it it appears to be between 1.5 and 2.5 times the width of a canoe, which is around 2 to 2.5 feet, so it's at least 3 feet across, and possibly as much as a bit over 6 feet, or 2 meters across at the "body". I don't know if there are trees that big in that area or not. OR - it could be just what it appears to be... a "monster" seeing oddly shaped humps on the shore, humps that could be others of it's own kind from it's own perspective, and closing in to take a closer look. I think there is enough information in the video to warrant closer inspection by someone local to there, if for no other reason then to rule out some of the possibilities like a waterlogged tree carcass, or to confirm that possibility. . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Kenzo - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 07:56 AM)Ninurta Wrote:(09-26-2021, 05:40 AM)Kenzo Wrote: Wow nice work Ninurta , it does look Nessie . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - BIAD - 09-26-2021 ....(double post).... RE: NESSIE is BACK! - BIAD - 09-26-2021 Well, another fine example of Ninurta's investigated prowess. Thank you for bringing the gif that shows something in a place where other witnesses have reported something out of tune happening. ....................................................... From taking a look at other videos from Richard Mavor's YouTube site, there doesn't seem to be any indication that he dabbles in the world of cryptozoology. Mavor's interests seem to aim towards Bushcraft and discussing wild-camping equipment. The Channels that are listed on his site are all connected to outdoor-living and moderate survival techniques. ....................................................... @Kenzo I believe Mavor didn't see the object captured from his drone simply because he wasn't looking for it. The nearest 'spookiness' he mentions is the feeling he got when canoeing across such a large body of water and the natural concerns one gets when taking stock of one's potentially life-threatening surroundings. ....................................................... The strange thing is that when Robert Rines ran his Loch Ness expedition in 1972, his underwater cameras picked uo the famous 'flipper' image that assisted in his hunt that culminated in 1975 when he captured a distant shot of what might have been the whole body of an animated object. Now look at the Rines picture on the left and the vague drone-image that Mavor acquired...They look similar. I doubt a same-shaped log would be still floating about the loch 46 years later. (Granted, the original Rines image shows the object inverted from the one below.) RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Kenzo - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 09:25 AM)BIAD Wrote: Well, another fine example of Ninurta's investigated prowess. Thank you for bringing the gif that shows something BINGO! look`s very similar RE: NESSIE is BACK! - BIAD - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 09:34 AM)Kenzo Wrote: And that's the problem with this whole out-of-the-norm situation. Before the fake 1934 Wilson/Surgeon photograph, the accepted reports all spoke of a 'humped' object in the water or when a neck and head were spoken of, the creature was reported to be partially out of the water. It was only after the toy submarine fakery, did people begin to mention a upright neck and small head, a physical function that didn't make sense when the body is said to be at right-angles to the neck. (Swan-like) Here in the Mavor drone-footage, we have something that makes sense, a slow-moving cautious animal -possibly a juvenile, that seems inquisitive to the actions in the water that had abated. RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Tarzan the apeman. - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 01:26 AM)guohua Wrote:I wonder how long that yellow canoe is on the beach?(09-26-2021, 12:51 AM)Ninurta Wrote: . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Ninurta - 09-26-2021 (09-26-2021, 11:00 PM)Tarzan the apeman. Wrote:(09-26-2021, 01:26 AM)guohua Wrote:I wonder how long that yellow canoe is on the beach?(09-26-2021, 12:51 AM)Ninurta Wrote: . I assumed it to be a 16 footer, which is how I estimated the length of the floaty thingy. If the canoe is a different length, that will affect the size estimate of the floater. The floater is 1.77 times the length of that canoe. . RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Bally002 - 09-27-2021 The story has come up on "that other site". Usual skeptics which is fine but another pic near a different canoe, red one. Perhaps post the Ninurta vid. Might get some bites. Just being cheeky, Kind regards, Bally:) RE: NESSIE is BACK! - Bally002 - 09-27-2021 Pic from TOS. Is this for real or a cut and paste. If I have overstepped the mark regarding reposting this pic please delete Mods. Posted on the thread re Nessie at TOS> Kind regards, Bally |