+- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com)
+-- Forum: Members Interests (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-49.html)
+--- Forum: Survival and Sustainability (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-51.html)
+--- Thread: Green is not so Green after all (/thread-5218.html)
Green is not so Green after all - 727Sky - 04-28-2020
I can't believe I watched the following video as it is not my normal kind of thing. Green Energy is B.S. and of course Eugenics is the answer. However it is an interesting video and worth a watch IMO
RE: Green is not so Green after all - guohua - 04-28-2020
Michael Moore,,,,,,,
I would rather pull my husband's teeth out with Pliers!
RE: Green is not so Green after all - 727Sky - 04-29-2020
Believe it or not Moore is not in the video nor is his voice or I would have passed too. Wind and solar have been touted as a savior for renewable energy which over the last 30 years has been proven "IT DON"T WORK" if you are looking for something to replace oil and gas.
Who would have thought that today you can buy a barrel of oil cheaper than a roll of toilet paper ?
I thought the video was great with delving into what and who is behind the propaganda we are exposed to constantly. I also felt that the underlining Eugenics aspect was subtle but forcefully presented. Agenda 2020/2030 crossed my mind more than once. Anyway if you have time take a look and you will walk away with realizing what a scam everything seems to be.
Around here they burn sugar cane yearly and the black soot and respiratory problems that causes makes the news papers every year. I bring this up because the video shows forest destruction so sugar cane can be planted for biomass to power the generation of electricity.
RE: Green is not so Green after all - Ninurta - 04-29-2020
Michael Moore putting out a movie showing what a farce "green energy" is? Say it ain't so!
I was impressed by the amount of work that the videographer put into exposing the "green economy" for what it is - a means of putting money in OTHER rich guy's pockets by exploiting the only planet we have to exploit. It's not to "save" the planet, it's just to make other guys richer before they die, and has no net saving value at all - as a matter of fact, it accelerates the destruction of Earth.
Now, what I'm going to say next will be hard to hear. It's hard to say. It's utterly heartless by the current measure of what "heartless" entails.
There really ARE way too damned many people on this planet. This lifeboat is exceeding it's carrying capacity. When I was born, there were about 3 billion people on the planet, and just in my lifetime that has more than doubled to about 7 1/2 billion. There are not enough resources to feed them all or preserve their sanity, and they are showing no signs of stopping procreating, making even MORE mouths for someone else to feed.
Too many of those excess people are what we used to call "useless eaters" before it became politically incorrect to call things what they really are. A lot of that has been caused by, believe it or not, advances in medical science. medicine today is keeping people alive who would otherwise have died early, before having a chance to procreate and pass on their defects, just 100 years ago from either genetic defects or just plain stupidity. That is weakening the human gene pool, diluting it, allowing genes to become entrenched that are defective, or just promote stupidity as a way of life - and the rest of us, in part through medical science, are keeping them artificially alive far beyond their expiration date. Those people are in turn breeding and procreating, producing multiple little copies of themselves, whom we are ALSO keeping artificially alive when nature would have weeded them out at an early age.... then THOSE useless eaters are turning around and doing the same procreating, further spreading defective genes and diluting the human gene pool.
Nature WILL eventually weed them out. it's inevitable. First it sent Islam as an example of what a mentally defective section of humanity is like, and to try wiping the rest of us out, but that seems to have been unsuccessful. I thought maybe COVID was it, the great plague to cull down the human race, but that fizzled, too - probably because it was a man-made virus, and Nature wanted nothing to do with that!
Something will come, probably sooner rather than later, to thin out the herd again as it does periodically. The great mass of humanity is piled up in cities, and cities are a prime mover for passing plagues from one person to another. If it doesn't the planet will be destroyed in just a couple more centuries, or sooner, and Earth is a self regulating system - it periodically wipes out experiments that have gotten out of hand entirely... and humanity may be just such an experiment. It's got nothing to do with "global warming" or a "green economy", or capitalism or socialism or any other ism. it's got only to do with simple economics - more mouths than there is food.
It's likely that at least a small remnant of humanity will survive, not in the cities but out in the countryside where they will be able to feed and defend themselves, but if that remnant is of the defective gene variety, even they will disappear, because some people really are just too dumb to live. I hope all of humanity has not been diluted that far.
.
RE: Green is not so Green after all - BIAD - 04-29-2020
(04-29-2020, 07:46 AM)Ninurta Wrote: ...There really ARE way too damned many people on this planet...Oh crap, I just saw Ninurta flip the safety off!
RE: Green is not so Green after all - 727Sky - 04-29-2020
Mini-Nuclear Reactors Are Coming, and They Could Reinvent the Energy Industry
We have the know how to produce Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors, but because they do not produce material that can be used to produce Nuclear bombs they are not backed by TPTB.
RE: Green is not so Green after all - 727Sky - 05-02-2020
RE: Green is not so Green after all - Wallfire - 05-05-2020
Moore is a person who I find it very hard to like. For a very long time he seemed to me as a person who just jumps on the bandwagon that he thinks will be the best for him and never seemed to care about anything but himself. Perhaps he like so many others has seen that the light has been turned onto the socialist left and more and more people are seeing just how big the lie of man made climate change is, and its true propose.
TV seems to have a lot of ads about how we should help refugees, save the climate, sort of gives a feeling of desperation of the people behind them. Its going to be one hell of a fight in the next few years to see if evil or truth wins out.
RE: Green is not so Green after all - Ninurta - 05-05-2020
(05-05-2020, 09:12 AM)Wallfire Wrote: Moore is a person who I find it very hard to like. For a very long time he seemed to me as a person who just jumps on the bandwagon that he thinks will be the best for him and never seemed to care about anything but himself. Perhaps he like so many others has seen that the light has been turned onto the socialist left and more and more people are seeing just how big the lie of man made climate change is, and its true propose.
TV seems to have a lot of ads about how we should help refugees, save the climate, sort of gives a feeling of desperation of the people behind them. Its going to be one hell of a fight in the next few years to see if evil or truth wins out.
Before you give Moore too much credit, he doesn't make any judgement either way on the basic veracity of the alleged "climate change" - in this film, he is only pointing out what a scam and "get rich quick" scheme "green energy" or "renewable energy" is. He doesn't address "climate change" in it at all.
.
RE: Green is not so Green after all - Wallfire - 05-05-2020
Moore will always do what is best for Moore, and make sure someone else gets the blame
RE: Green is not so Green after all - Blackrussian63 - 03-20-2022
A typical EV battery weighs one thousand pounds, about the size of a travel trunk. It contains twenty-five pounds of lithium, sixty pounds of nickel, 44 pounds of manganese, 30 pounds cobalt, 200 pounds of copper, and 400 pounds of aluminum, steel, and plastic. Inside are over 6,000 individual lithium-ion cells.
To manufacture each EV auto battery, you must process 25,000 pounds of brine for the lithium, 30,000 pounds of ore for the cobalt, 5,000 pounds of ore for the nickel, and 25,000 pounds of ore for copper. All told, you dig up 500,000 pounds of the earth's crust for one battery."
"Going Green" may sound like the Utopian ideal but when you look at the hidden and embedded costs realistically with an open mind, you can see that Going Green is more destructive to the Earth's environment than meets the eye, for sure.
Not to mention the cold temperatures in Canada during the winter do not work well in electric cars.
RE: Green is not so Green after all - fishertail - 03-20-2022
I've been saying this in my circle for a while now. Green energy is two things: a corporate money grab, and a vote machine.
It's easy for politicians to use the Save the Earth narrative to get people hyped up--once they got them emotional they got control of them. Same for the companies profiting off them.
What I can't believe is how fast they want to push it. Adding small amounts of renewables here and there over time is the best way to help in the long run. Pushing it all over night is just another way to give people the sense of urgency and emotional control the corporations and government want to establish. All games.
How about all the plastic manufacturing and waste all of the disposable gadgets the same people are pushing on the masses... the same masses who love to consume? What is that doing to the environment? Think about it. Humans are wasteful by nature. No battery is going to change that.
RE: Green is not so Green after all - NightskyeB4Dawn - 03-20-2022
(03-20-2022, 08:37 PM)Blackrussian63 Wrote: A typical EV battery weighs one thousand pounds, about the size of a travel trunk. It contains twenty-five pounds of lithium, sixty pounds of nickel, 44 pounds of manganese, 30 pounds cobalt, 200 pounds of copper, and 400 pounds of aluminum, steel, and plastic. Inside are over 6,000 individual lithium-ion cells.
To manufacture each EV auto battery, you must process 25,000 pounds of brine for the lithium, 30,000 pounds of ore for the cobalt, 5,000 pounds of ore for the nickel, and 25,000 pounds of ore for copper. All told, you dig up 500,000 pounds of the earth's crust for one battery."
"Going Green" may sound like the Utopian ideal but when you look at the hidden and embedded costs realistically with an open mind, you can see that Going Green is more destructive to the Earth's environment than meets the eye, for sure.
Not to mention the cold temperatures in Canada during the winter do not work well in electric cars.
The problem I keep running into when it comes to those folk that are sitting around trying to create a better world of their own making, is that they never look at all the pieces of the puzzle.
Everyone has a brilliant blueprints for how to build a brick house, but no one has even thought about where they are going to get the bricks.