For YOU Crypto Types - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com) +-- Forum: The Conspiracy Corner (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-35.html) +--- Forum: Cryptozoology (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-39.html) +--- Thread: For YOU Crypto Types (/thread-4800.html) |
RE: For YOU Crypto Types - BIAD - 10-28-2019 Here's a video where Paul Sinclair -a honest guy who's looking for answers, relates his collection of information about some places not that far way from me. In an area of Britain where pragmatic people live a down-to-earth lifestyle and don't suffer fools gladly, Mr. Sinclair speaks of happenings that are just... well, just shouldn't. RE: For YOU Crypto Types - guohua - 10-28-2019 (10-24-2019, 03:30 PM)BIAD Wrote: Here's a curious regurgitation of Dr Melba Ketchum's genome work on the alleged Sasquatch samples My Husband replies,,,,,, Exactly! RE: For YOU Crypto Types - BIAD - 11-05-2019 I was watching a live-stream on Monday that discussed and mapped reports of an increasing phenomena of 'Bigfoot'-like creatures allegedly wandering the woods of the United Kingdom. As the lady read out the sent-in reports, I recalled that I'd actually corresponded with this person in regards of artwork that she had asked for -for her YouTube channel. During the back-and-forth chat of the occasional sightings, prolific discoveries of stick-structures, oddly-placed twigs commonly known as 'glyphs' and what she wanted in her artwork, I dared to suggest that another type of biped may be leaving these signs and that the significance may still align with water sources and food access, but the perpetrators may be humans. Of course, not wishing to disturb the ethos of her beliefs, she didn't comment on it and I didn't push it further. Then on Monday's live-stream, she mentioned that 'corridors' or places where folk tend to not go, could be used by these enigmatic creatures and that railways are a good example. Then, to offer proof that such isolated areas are used, she said that she had often seen workers and -what she believed, illegal migrants walking along the embankments in the late hours when the trains had stopped running. In regards of Bigfoot, I like to leave the settled dust on my Occam's Razor and cleave to the idea that such beasts exist. But in regards of a UK 'Woodwose' leaving indecipherable messages in the thin strips of trees between small towns and surrounding farm land, the theory that those who benefit from open borders may be an idea closer to reality. It's just an idea. Quote:September 20, 2018Migration Watch: RE: For YOU Crypto Types - BIAD - 11-06-2019 Here's one for Ninurta. It's another David Paulides interview and goes through his usual unusual cases of people going missing in forested areas. The point in the interview I found intriguing is a report beginning at the time-stamp of 20.12 and I wondered if Ninurta would've been interested. 20.12 is where it begins. RE: For YOU Crypto Types - guohua - 11-06-2019 @"Ninurta" and of-course everyone interested,,, this video I'll post starting at ruffly the 22:00 minute mark is Extremely Interesting with Tape recording of the sounds made by these creatures and this is Not Digital recording, these are actual tape recordings. RE: For YOU Crypto Types - BIAD - 11-06-2019 And we walked out of Africa, but unlike the academics who say the Sasquatch can't exist, didn't backtrack like the same scientists are doing now! (Notice how the image is still shown as an ape, they avoid giving it human-like features!) Quote:Bones of ape living 12m years ago point to genesis of upright walking.SOURCE: RE: For YOU Crypto Types - Ninurta - 11-07-2019 (11-06-2019, 04:33 PM)BIAD Wrote: Here's one for Ninurta. It's another David Paulides interview and goes through his usual unusual Yup, interesting. A bit reminiscent of the "clanking" noise I heard hears ago, with some differences. The noise I heard was coming from one singular spot on earth - one step forward from that spot, nothing, one step backwards from that spot, nothing again, but standing directly on it, there was a "clank - clank - clank" noise that sounded like it was coming from the earth itself, directly under my feet. It was repetitive, like some sort of machinery running. it sounded like a blacksmith hammering or a power hammer running. No idea what it was besides just plain weird. It was out in, what was back then, the middle of nowhere. For those with Google Earth, you can search on the co-ordinates 36°57'28.51" N 82°00'07.34" W and get near the exact spot, or within a few meters of it. It was in the middle of that roadway, but may have been a few meters further forward or a few further backward. Back then, the only building in that area was the house and barn"behind" the point, along the roadway going farther back into the mountain. The branching road and trailer were not there, and neither of the buildings closer to the main road that trackway leads into were there. What the hunter described sounded to me like a single "clank", as if a metal door slammed shut, rather than the repetitive noise I heard, but the metallic clank quality sounds similar. . RE: For YOU Crypto Types - Ninurta - 11-07-2019 (11-06-2019, 05:06 PM)guohua Wrote: @"Ninurta" and of-course everyone interested,,, this video I'll post starting at ruffly the 22:00 minute mark is Extremely Interesting with Tape recording of the sounds made by these creatures and this is Not Digital recording, these are actual tape recordings. Very odd. Many of the noises were simian-like hoots, howls, grunts, etc, but some of them sounded to me like language being spoken, although the language was not French, as one of the hunters seems to have replied with. I heard 3 distinct, or possibly 4 distinct individuals speaking it or hooting. I have to assume that the recordings were paired incidentally with the video just for the movie, because in the early 70's, the only night vision devices I am aware of were owned by the military (AN-PVS2, maybe an AN-PVS4), and were cost prohibitive for your average hunter to get a hold of to drag out into the woods to record bigfoot howls with. . RE: For YOU Crypto Types - guohua - 11-07-2019 @"Ninurta" Quote:Very odd. Many of the noises were simian-like hoots, howls, grunts, etc, but some of them sounded to me like language being spoken, although the language was not French, as one of the hunters seems to have replied with. I heard 3 distinct, or possibly 4 distinct individuals speaking it or hooting. Yes, Yes, I thought it sounded like Gutural Old Veitmeness my husband said it sounded like Tibetan he had heard years ago in Siberia. You are right, it did sound like there was a language of some sort. RE: For YOU Crypto Types - BIAD - 11-07-2019 Of course, to counter the Morehead-Sierra sounds, the establishment have to step in and place their stamp of my-way-or-highway jurisdiction on any suggestions that favours the idea of an unknown language-using entity. (From Scientific American.com) Quote:'...The Sierra Sound recordings, also known as the Berry/Morehead tapes, are touted as the gold-standard Staying with the rationale, any human that passes you in the street cannot be defined fully as a modern human unless they speak?!! I understand the exposition that the sounds may have come from humans, but again, this is using the stone-set establishment precedent that Bigfoot doesn't exist, ergo the sounds were from animals with human-like vocal abilities. Quote:'...It is obvious that other animals made some of the sounds, such as bears. Or the alternative balanced suggestion that the 'proto-language' is from a group of proto-humans!! We don't know what Cro-Magnons sounded like and it's only a supposition of a date when Homo sapiens first began to vocally communicate. Maybe the 'chatter' in the recordings sound like early-man because the ones producing the sound IS early-man or an off-shoot not discovered yet. Ffs, why does everything have to be negative when it comes to this subject, it's not like it'll be the anthropologists will have to rewrite the f*ckin' history books themselves! Quote:'...This "Bigfoot" is likely human, and the Sierra Sounds a combination of hoax and misidentification, like all of Here we go, ridicule a person interested in the phenomena and simultaneously mocking the phenomena with certain word-use. The vice-like grip of establishment on what is the reality we're in must be kept within the framework provided, anything outside that structure is corrupt and arrived at via underhanded action. Quote:'...He also believes he can speak "Bigfoot". Nelson claims he has identified not only vocalizations such as whistles, Wow...! How f*ckin' stupid is R. Scott Nelson! Fancy thinking we can talk to another species on this planet!! Next, we'll be thinking parrots can copy our language. Quote:'...As Nelson argues, "The existence of the Sasquatch Being is hereby assumed, since any creature must exist before Here's where the canny word-use comes into play. It gives a little, slyly invites you out into the weeds and then mentally sodomises any proposition that Bigfoot-only, can exist. Quote:'...For arguments sake, if Bigfoot did exist, the species would likely have developed its own system of communication,SOURCE: And there you have it. The article places Bigfoot firmly in the animal realm, where evidence abides that apes use basic rudimentary diction and physical signals within their own specific species and since Bigfoot would behave the same, the Sierra Nevada recordings are fake. Then finally, the shovel of dirt on the coffin that academia has been using for years was thrown. No solid evidence, so no Bigfoot. Every poor bugger that's seen one of these things is a liar, the language on the tapes are just kids goofing around in the dark and it's all-one big tourist-trap. The scientists who keep pushing back in time our 'human'-origins, told us so. RE: For YOU Crypto Types - Ninurta - 11-07-2019 (11-07-2019, 12:43 PM)BIAD Wrote:Quote:'...This "Bigfoot" is likely human, and the Sierra Sounds a combination of hoax and misidentification, like all of So he's a cryptologist? One of those people who are trained to find patterns of communication in what otherwise is gibberish? Quote:Quote:'...He also believes he can speak "Bigfoot". Nelson claims he has identified not only vocalizations such as whistles, Ooh! Ooh! I can answer that one! Pick me! He probably doesn't use the IPA because it's friggin' ridiculous, and doesn't reproduce sounds very well on vocal chords used to speaking English - or any other human language, for that matter. Just TRY to make sense of it - you can find it in any Wikipedia entry. Use those symbols to try reproducing a sound - go on, just TRY it! Unlike the Guohuas, I cannot read Chinese script. Nor can I read Sanskrit or whatever that script is that Cambodian is written in. I CAN read English, Greek, Arabic, and Cyrillic scripts, but IPA is so unintelligible that it may as well be written in scratches on rock. I wouldn't use it, either. When I learned Shawnee, the script used was English with diacritics so that we could pronounce it properly. When I learned Arabic, the script used was Arabic - again, so we could pronounce it properly. IPA is not a script, it gibberish, unfit for use in reproducing actual sounds, much less languages. One might be forgiven for thinking, however, that a background in recognizing intelligible patterns might qualify one for recognizing... intelligible patterns, such as phonemes... Quote:Quote:'...As Nelson argues, "The existence of the Sasquatch Being is hereby assumed, since any creature must exist before You said that quote comes from Scientific American? As science goes, it's not very science-y. It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to realize that the statement Nelson makes answers BOTH of the "prior" questions the article postulates. As a matter of fact, it seems designed to answer them both... is logic entirely dead in the modern world? Quote:Quote:'...For arguments sake, if Bigfoot did exist, the species would likely have developed its own system of communication,SOURCE: ALL animals that I have so far encountered have a "language". ALL of them, not just primates. Since such language does not, however, use human phonemes for the most part, does that really bar it from classification as a language? Even crows, with brains the size of a pea, use language. They have, more than once, told me when there is another human around, and even whether or not that human has a gun. Yes, they recognize that, and have a different vocalization for it. They know, and can communicate, the differences between a bear, a bobcat, a dog/ coyote, a hawk, a snake, a human, and a human with a gun. Now to be fair, they were not specifically talking to ME, but they let each other know, for half a mile around, and I pick up on it. If even a crow can do that, where does Scientific American place the bar for "language"? The article appears to be based upon faulty logic, faulty science, and shoddy workmanship... and closed minds (never a good attribute in someone claiming to be searching for "truth"). As an aside, regarding the "so-called Orang Pendek", is it just me, or has anyone else ever pondered a potential relationship between the Flores Hobbits and the "so-called Orang Pendek"? Might that be not just a passing resemblance? . RE: For YOU Crypto Types - Mystic Wanderer - 11-07-2019 I don't remember hearing anything like those recordings from the creature who lurked in the woods across from my house when I was a child. The recording did, however, have similarities to what others have heard from Bigfoot, so they claim. I also believe any animal can communicate with others. They have their own language, and they get their point across in different ways than humans. They also use telepathy, which means they are probably above humans when it comes to communication. RE: For YOU Crypto Types - BIAD - 11-07-2019 (11-07-2019, 05:51 PM)Ninurta Wrote: You said that quote comes from Scientific American? As science goes, it's not very science-y... Yep, a place where you're supposed to not question their opinions. Quote:ALL animals that I have so far encountered have a "language". Ah, that's where you screwed-up! You moved off the confined narrative where the science wants to keep you. Of course all animals have ways of communicating and of course, different species can learn to utilise those languages even if they cannot fully appreciate the nuances embedded in them. But the sceptics of Bigfoot want you to believe that the recorded sounds are not communication because the only true animal that can 'talk' is a human. However, I agree, The Scientific American website isn't very scientific. The blog was written by Karen Stollznow Karen Stollznow is a linguist, columnist and the author of God Bless America, Haunting America and Language Myths, Mysteries and Magic. She received her Ph.D. in linguistics from the University of New England, Australia, and she lives in Denver, Colorado. She has a Ph.D. so you she's not a deplorable like us! RE: For YOU Crypto Types - BIAD - 11-15-2019 I was surprised to see this unlikely article in The Guardian today. One may assume all the other minority groups are all used up! Quote:Sasquatch or Wendigo? Mysterious howls in Canadian wilderness spark confusion.The Guardian: RE: For YOU Crypto Types - Mystic Wanderer - 11-15-2019 I don't know what it is, but can you imagine hearing that in the woods during the night?
Chilling sound!
RE: For YOU Crypto Types - Ninurta - 11-15-2019 I've heard sounds very VERY similar to that in the woods here. Whenever I'd go to investigate, it usually turned out to be someone's hound running a deer. As an aside, I've found a video I cannot download for more advanced analysis - this one. There is no button from One Click YouTube Video Downloader on the page, and pasting the URL into Dimeo just results in download failure. The sound is pretty dim from YouTube, even through headphones, so I was going to download it locally to increase the volume, but no dice. Due to that inability, I'm going to call it a hoax, or at the very worst The Hound of the Baskervilles. ETA: There are certain kinds of Cur Hounds that bay like that. . |