Think Twice Before Sending in Your DNA

Think Twice Before Sending in Your DNA - Printable Version

+- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com)
+-- Forum: The Conspiracy Corner (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-35.html)
+--- Forum: The Enlightened Ones or The Powers That Be (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-37.html)
+--- Thread: Think Twice Before Sending in Your DNA (/thread-3470.html)

Think Twice Before Sending in Your DNA - Mystic Wanderer - 05-31-2018

Oh yes, they make it so tempting to hand over your DNA, telling you you need to know where you came from. Maybe you were related to some famous person of old, or whatever hook they can think of. But, before you do, remember... the government has always had sinister motives for collecting anything as personal as DNA.

What they really want is to keep a file for what could kill you, or make you sick enough to have to spend your life savings on Big Pharma meds; keep you dependent on the government for help.

But, personally, I think it's more about depopulation. They can't seem to get a war off the ground to kill us, so what else do they have up their sleeve?

All it would take to accomplish their task if they had a person's DNA would be to "create an enzyme to target the genomes of the sick. Create an immunogen to kill off foreign invaders. (Vaccines) Put them together to target someone by DNA. Infect entire water supply and kill only intended victim(s)."
(quotes by Momma MacGyver on Twitter)

Remember when Hillary told her diplomats to get DNA of UN ambassadors? Hmmm... I wonder why? minusculethinking

Quote:Hillary Clinton told diplomats to obtain DNA from foreign officials 8 years before Martin Shkreli posted a bounty for her hair

Martin Shkreli had his $5 million bond revoked for offering cash for hair grabbed from Hillary Clinton's head.

In 2009, classified cables show that the State Department, which was led at the time by Clinton, sought biometric information such as DNA from foreign officials.

The officials included key leaders at the United Nations, and representatives for Security Council members.

[size]

Notorious "pharma bro" Martin Shkreli and former presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton have at least one thing in common: they both wanted to have other people to collect someone else's DNA.

Eight years before this week's abrupt jailing of Shkreli for offering Facebook followers a $5,000 bounty for a sample of Clinton's hair, then-Secretary of State Clinton requested that American diplomats collect "biometric information" — such as DNA — from their foreign counterparts, classified documents show.

Those documents detailing a U.S. diplomatic spy effort, obtained in 2010 by Wikileaks, offer yet another bizarre twist to the already bizarre story of how convicted fraudster Shkreli had his $5 million release bond revoked Wednesday night.

Shkreli, 34, last week in a Facebook post, urged his 70,000 or so followers to grab some of Clinton's hair during her ongoing book tour — and said he would pay $5,000 per hair.

"I must confirm the sequences I already have," wrote Shkreli, who in posts a week before said he had Clinton's DNA and suggested he planned to clone her.

Shkreli later claimed the hair bounty offer was a joke. But unamused federal prosecutors asked a judge to revoke his $5 million bail, saying he was a danger to the community.

Judge Kiyo Matsumoto, agreed Wednesday, despite lengthy arguments by Shkreli's lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, that Shkreli was not violent and did not represent a danger to Clinton or anyone else.

Shkreli now is incarcerated in a Brooklyn, New York, federal jail, where he will await a Jan. 16 sentencing for his conviction in August on securities fraud charges related to hedge funds and a drug company he ran.

Meanwhile, Clinton is continuing to promote her new book about the 2016 presidential election, "What Happened."

What happened in July 2009, according to the Wikileaks documents, is that a State Department cable issued under Clinton's name to American diplomats "called for detailed biometric information 'on key [United Nation's] officials, to include undersecretaries, heads of specialised agencies and their chief advisers," The Guardian newspaper reported in 2010.

[/size]

(Red highlights by me)

So, if not for nefarious reasons, why would people in government be so eager to get another person's hair (DNA)?

Quote:
Judge sends Martin Shkreli to jail for Facebook post 10:53 AM ET Thu, 14 Sept 2017 | 00:45

Notorious "pharma bro" Martin Shkreli and former presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton have at least one thing in common: they both wanted to have other people to collect someone else's DNA.

Eight years before this week's abrupt jailing of Shkreli for offering Facebook followers a $5,000 bounty for a sample of Clinton's hair, then-Secretary of State Clinton requested that American diplomats collect "biometric information" — such as DNA — from their foreign counterparts, classified documents show.

Those documents detailing a U.S. diplomatic spy effort, obtained in 2010 by Wikileaks, offer yet another bizarre twist to the already bizarre story of how convicted fraudster Shkreli had his $5 million release bond revoked Wednesday night.

Getty Images

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton signs copies of her new book 'What Happened' during an event at a Barnes & Noble bookstore, Sept. 12, 2017, in New York City.

Shkreli, 34, last week in a Facebook post, urged his 70,000 or so followers to grab some of Clinton's hair during her ongoing book tour — and said he would pay $5,000 per hair.

"I must confirm the sequences I already have," wrote Shkreli, who in posts a week before said he had Clinton's DNA and suggested he planned to clone her.

Shkreli later claimed the hair bounty offer was a joke. But unamused federal prosecutors asked a judge to revoke his $5 million bail, saying he was a danger to the community.

Judge Kiyo Matsumoto, agreed Wednesday, despite lengthy arguments by Shkreli's lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, that Shkreli was not violent and did not represent a danger to Clinton or anyone else.

Shkreli now is incarcerated in a Brooklyn, New York, federal jail, where he will await a Jan. 16 sentencing for his conviction in August on securities fraud charges related to hedge funds and a drug company he ran.

Meanwhile, Clinton is continuing to promote her new book about the 2016 presidential election, "What Happened."

What happened in July 2009, according to the Wikileaks documents, is that a State Department cable issued under Clinton's name to American diplomats "called for detailed biometric information 'on key [United Nation's] officials, to include undersecretaries, heads of specialised agencies and their chief advisers," The Guardian newspaper reported in 2010.

Justin Solomon | CNBC

Martin Shkreli on lunch break from his court trial in Brooklyn, New York on June 29th, 2017.
Biometric information was also desired from permanent Security Council representatives from China, Russia, France and the United Kingdom, the newspaper reported.

"A parallel directive sent to diplomats in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi said biometric data included DNA, fingerprints and iris scans," the Guardian noted at that time.

Shkreli's lawyer declined to comment Thursday when CNBC asked about disclosures in the Wikileaks documents regarding Clinton and the State Department.

CNBC has reached out to representatives for Clinton seeking comment.

Source

Good luck getting a comment from Killary CNBC, at least one that's honest.

Just be careful, and realize "they" don't always have your best interest at heart.
The bad news is, they started collecting DNA from newborn babies now. These people are EVIL! tinyok

RE: Think Twice Before Sending in Your DNA - Ninurta - 06-04-2018

Meh.

Every day of my life, I leave a continuous trail of DNA that is a minimum of 8 miles long. If "they" wanted it, then "they" got it years ago. Mysteriously, I seem to still be alive.

I did have my DNA tested recently, and discovered there are no genetic weaknesses or proclivity to disease that was exploitable in a "kill Ninurta" scenario. They'll just have to content themselves with coming at me, bro, with a knife, gun, or crowbar in a decidedly mundane bid to end my days. As a matter of fact, if we discount the aforementioned scenario involving knives, guns, and /or crowbars... or the occasional rampant bus intent on mayhem... I'm expected to live a fair bit longer than the average human, a trait that oddly enough got passed on to my son. He got none of my Indian DNA, yet inherited the live-forever genes. Science can be a fickle mistress.

It was also discovered that I have more Neanderthal inheritance than the average, substantially more, and that I have an odd and haunting connection with ancient Siberian mammoth hunters from 45,000 years ago. It's still a mystery as to how that much of their DNA survived and wound up in a modern human after all that time. Maybe something to do with those live-forever genes.

Oh, I can still be killed - but one would meet with more success on that front by poking me with a sharp stick than by attacking my molecules. I'm given to understand that I can eat buckets of microbes awash in enzyme sauce without ill effect.

The experiment - if that's what it was - failed, and failed dismally. So dramatically so that there was discussion around the notion of not releasing the results of my test at all, not even to me, and slapping a "Classified - National Security" label on it before hiding it in a vault somewhere. After 4 days of debate, the notion was overruled. The consensus was that no one would believe it anyhow, so what was the harm?

I'm not superman, according to the results, but I AM mighty nigh indestructable... unless you have a knife, gun, crowbar, pointy stick, or errant bus.

I guess I probably ought to be on the lookout for those... as well as Mormon cloning labs churning out copy after copy of me in a bid to take over the world.

.

RE: Think Twice Before Sending in Your DNA - guohua - 06-04-2018

@"Ninurta" That is Interesting.
Thank You.

RE: Think Twice Before Sending in Your DNA - Ninurta - 06-05-2018

(06-04-2018, 05:18 PM)guohua Wrote: @"Ninurta" That is Interesting.
Thank You.

Well, my post may have been a bit hyperbolic and embellished, but not by much. The ancient DNA actually is present, in a fairly large quantity, and I do have longer telomeres than the average person indicating a propensity to outlive my usefulness by several years, but that runs in the family. One of my ancestors lived to 109, and was interviewed in a report in an 1836 edition of the Southern Literary Messenger while on a 125 mile trip, on foot, at the age of 93. At that time his oldest child was 67, his youngest just over a year old. Folks in my family just tend to keep going and going, like the Eveready Bunny, long after our usefulness is gone.

That's genetic, I suppose, and now I have scientific evidence of it. I have no idea what the 4 day delay was really about - I wasn't privy to the actual discussions around it.

RE: Think Twice Before Sending in Your DNA - Mystic Wanderer - 06-05-2018

(06-05-2018, 12:22 AM)Ninurta Wrote: Folks in my family just tend to keep going and going, like the Eveready Bunny, long after our usefulness is gone.

That's genetic, I suppose, and now I have scientific evidence of it. I have no idea what the 4 day delay was really about - I wasn't privy to the actual discussions around it.

That's good to know Daddy. tinylaughing