Quote:Published on Dec 16, 2016
Visit http://www.DarkJournalist.com

Desperate Mainstream Media Attacks Independent Journalists

In this Media Attacks Special Report, Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes back dynamic author and the publisher of the ForbiddenKnowledgeTV website Alexandra Bruce. In the wake of the desperate attempts by the Corporate Media to portray the Alternative Media as dangerous to try and stave off their own massive plunge into irrelevance, the media establishment is now trying to hide their failed attempts to manipulate the Presidential Election and put Neocon Democrat Hillary Clinton into the White House with the help of fake polls, biased reporting, behind the scenes collusion and false memes.

Their solution, coordinated at a high level with Social Media figures like Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and funded by shady covert actors, like billionaire activist George Soros, was to create a new meme called ‘Fake News’ to label independent sites and citizen journalists who expose their unethical behavior and report news in an unfiltered way to the public as a threat to democracy.

Smear Campaign
Their slanderous smear campaign has reached a new low with the publication of a McCarthyite list of Alternative Media websites in the Washington Post that were supposedly in league with Russia according to a discredited website called PropOrNot (Washington Post eventually added an addendum to the article featuring the list saying they couldn’t vouch for the source). The pathetic attempt to create a conspiracy theory that paints the brave independent voices who give the real truth to their readers with minimal resources as somehow traitorous, harkens back to the red scare tactics of the 1950’s and shows that the Mainstream Media is caught in a death spiral.The shocking disinformation tactics show they are unsure of how to redeem their falling numbers, bailing advertisers, and destroyed reputation that is in tatters especially since they unabashedly lied to the American people during the election in order to curry favor with the corporate power brokers that are attempting to install a Global Government.

Alexandra sees a coordinated campaign targeting Independent Media financially, and trying to shut as many of them down as possible by blocking them on Facebook, Twitter and other Social Media outlets. Whether you’re a Liberal Democrat shocked by the media character assassination of Bernie Sanders, a Libertarian repulsed by the intrusion of the CIA into the limelight with false propaganda about Russia, an Independent disturbed by the use of the Green Party and Jill Stein as puppets with behind the scenes Clinton-funded recounts to delegitimize the election, or a Republican shocked by the threatening pressure on electors and 24/7 negative coverage of President-Elect Trump, now is the time to unmask the cowardly trolls in charge of the Corporate Mainstream Media and reveal them as the true purveyors of 'Fake News.'

Shocking, eye-opening, and overflowing with powerful implications, don’t miss this exciting part 1 Dark Journalist episode!

https://youtu.be/OgI-IJVMYco

Quote:news' filters

By John R. Lott
Published December 16, 2016
FoxNews.com
Facebook Twitter livefyre Email Print
 (AP)
To protect Americans against “fake” news, Facebook will now use filters so that only “reputable” articles can appear at the top of users’ trending news stories.  And Facebook is going to media fact checkers for help (initially ABC News, The Associated Press, FactCheck.org, Politifact and Snopes). But guess what? These fact checkers have their own biases — usually the same liberal biases that we see in the rest of the mainstream media.

Before the 1990s, the mainstream media had a monopoly on the news.  Then came the rise of talk radio, Fox News, and the internet. This was a wonderful thing for freedom of information.
Facebook has already faced a scandal for having “filtered out stories on conservative topics from conservative sites.” 

But to get an idea of how bias also affects fact checkers, just consider a few evaluations from Politifact.
— "We’re the highest taxed nation in the world. Our businesses pay more taxes than any businesses in the world. That’s why companies are leaving.” Donald Trump on "Meet the Press" on May 8, 2016

Donald Trump was clearly talking about tax rates for businesses.  But in rating the claim as “False,” Politifact focuses on total federal tax burden as a share of GDP. Trump was correct that the U.S. has the world's highest corporate income tax rate (combined federal and state).  In 2016, that rate was 38.9 percent  France came in second with 34.4 percent.  But Politifact conveniently overlooks state taxes, which are really what put the U.S. over the top compared to so many other countries.

— On November 9, California Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom claimed that his state’s gun control laws were responsible for a "56 percent decline in the gun murder rate" since the 1990s.  Politifact rated this statement as only "mostly true,” but only because the drop in murders was even greater than 56 percent between 1993 and 2014.  

Bizarrely, Politifact didn’t question the claim that this drop was due to California’s gun control laws. Pete Wilson, who was the Republican governor from 1991 to 1999, did very little on gun control. 
Probably the only significant new regulation was the 1994 California Gun Free School Zone law, but this didn't even forbid permit holders from carrying on school property.  

The major gun regulations only started after Democrat Gray Davis took office in 1999.  During the first five years of the period Politifact studied when there was little change in gun laws, gun murders fell by 54 percent, over 80 percent the total 67 percent drop between 1993 and 2014.  

Politifact ignores all of the other major crime legislation that was enacted by the Republican governor.  For instance, California passed the 1994 Three Strikes law, which doubled the penalty for a second felony if the first one was serious or violent.  A third felony carried a prison sentence of 25 years to life.  Much research showed that significantly higher criminal penalties likely played a role in reducing crime rates.

— “Of course there is large scale voter fraud happening on and before election day.”  Donald Trump on Monday, October 17th, 2016 in a tweet

Politifact didn’t just say that this claim was false, they deemed it worth the designation: Liar, Liar “Pants on Fire.”  While the term “large scale” fraud might be in the eye of the beholder, voter fraud in 2008 gave Al Franken the Senatorship in Minnesota and even control of entire state legislatures have been determined (e.g., the Pennsylvania state Senate in 1994).  From California to Pennsylvania to Virginia to Indiana, many thousands of illegal aliens, dead people, and just non-existent ones were caught being registered to vote just a month or so before November election.

A 2014 study published in the journal Electoral Studies used survey data to estimate that 6.4 percent of the nation’s non-citizens voted in 2008 — that would be over a million votes.  Another 2012 study from the Pew Center on the States estimated that one out of every eight voter registrations is inaccurate, out-of-date or duplicate, 2.8 million people are registered in more than one state, and 1.8 million registered voters are dead. 

In an undercover video, a New York City Board of Elections member was recently caught complaining about the amount of voter fraud created by New York City mayor Bill de Blasio’s decision to give out ID cards without checking recipients’ identities. 

Quote:Every Good American should Boycott Facebook, I read about the Filters Zuckerberg (Sniveling, Liberal) had installed on Facebook and I know it won't belong before he has a Filter installed to Block any links to sites like our's.

(12-17-2016, 10:22 PM)guohua Wrote: Great article and video Mystic.
If you don't follow their example and believe them you're Branded a Racist, Bigot, Homophobe and Hater.
Like the USSR before the Fall of Communism, modern day Progressives Only Allow Their Views To be Heard, Seen and Read.

(12-18-2016, 06:08 AM)Ninurta Wrote:

(12-17-2016, 10:22 PM)guohua Wrote: Great article and video Mystic.
If you don't follow their example and believe them you're Branded a Racist, Bigot, Homophobe and Hater.
Like the USSR before the Fall of Communism, modern day Progressives Only Allow Their Views To be Heard, Seen and Read.

Aye, but we don't care what they "allow", now do we? The whole purpose of being Rogues and Outlaws (synonymous terms around here) is to simply not give a shit what is "allowed", as we do what we please, and damn the allowances!

Also, and speaking purely for myself, I have not a single thin fuck left to give about what the Progressives want to call me. Racist, Bigot, Homophobe, Hater - I just give way, WAY less than a damn what names they want to call me. I gave up name-calling in grade school, and found far more productive ways and methods to disagree with folk.

"Racist"? Why yes, I LOVE to drive cars fast!

"Bigot"? well, it beats hell out of being a Littleot!

"Homophobe"? Why would I fear what they tell me I cannot understand? Hell, If I can't understand it, then clearly I can't know enough about it to fear it!

"Hater"? Why, hell YES! I absolutely HATE burned steak, and gin. That there is some nasty stuff - who wants to drink a pine tree, any how? Can they show me someone who doesn't hate SOMETHING? we're all haters - and they've not paid their dues to join the club! Probably waiting on the gummint to pay their dues for them...

So, to tally it up, exactly zero fucks are given about what names Progressives want to call me. I may give so few fucks about it that the Progressive owe me a couple.

Oh - and have a nice day, y'all! Here's a rebel flag bumper sticker for yer Progressivemobile, just to prove there ain't no hard feelings!.

(12-18-2016, 10:58 PM)Sol Wrote: In my lifetime, I have never seen so much disinformation, misinformation and fabrication coming from the news media. Ever.

The puppet masters aren't happy. And for anyone who has but half a brain, it's quite obvious.

Merry Christmas !! : )

(12-19-2016, 02:01 AM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote:

(12-18-2016, 10:58 PM)Sol Wrote: In my lifetime, I have never seen so much disinformation, misinformation and fabrication coming from the news media. Ever.

The puppet masters aren't happy. And for anyone who has but half a brain, it's quite obvious.

Merry Christmas !! : )

Me either!  And I'm older than you! 

I ran into one of those people today who doesn't have half a brain.  It took everything in me to stay clam. I tried to explain certain things about Hillary that this person just wasn't seeing, and all they could say back to me was, "That's all a bunch of lies."

REALLY?!!!!  

Sometimes I just have to scratch my head in bewilderment and walk away!   It must be all that "brain entrainment" that's got to them!

Quote:Thomas Oppermann, chairman of Germany’s Social Democratic Party, suggests a strict law with concurrent stiff penalty might be the best method of combating the plethora of “fake news” now apparently flooding the interwebs.

“Facebook did not avail itself of the opportunity to regulate the issue of complaint management itself,” Oppermann told Der Spiegel in an interview Friday. “Now market dominating platforms like Facebook will be legally required to build a legal protection office in Germany that is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.”

According to Deutsche Welle, this would allow putative ‘victims’ of fake news or hate speech to contact Facebook and request action be taken.

“If, after appropriate examination, Facebook does not delete the offending message within 24 hours,” Oppermann continued, “it should expect individual fines of up to 500,000 euros ($523,320).”

Germany’s announcement comes on the heels of Facebook’s formally announcing its newest plan to deal with the same “fake news” issue — the company will partner with adamantly left-leaning organizations Snopes, Politifact, FactCheck.org, the Associated Press, and ABC News to vet and label items “disputed.” Corporate media largely lauded that announcement, ignoring entirely the distinct potentiality for the effort to amount to blatant censorship of all ideas not in lock step with the neoliberal establishment.

All of this, despite Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg declaring shortly after the U.S. presidential election,

“Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99 percent of what people see is authentic. Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes. The hoaxes that do exist are not limited to one partisan view, or even to politics. Overall, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other.”

Zuckerberg and Facebook quickly changed their tune when it became clear the Democrat establishment wished to target alternative, independent, and right-leaning media organizations to shoulder the blame of its own shortcomings in the election of Donald Trump to the presidency.

While corporate media presstitutes praised fealty to Hillary Clinton, alternative outlets reported on the contents of documents leaked to Wikileaks concerning the former secretary of state — including collusion by those same ‘reporters’ with Clinton’s campaign.

Indeed, though analysts first decried the idea ‘fake news’ or misinformation swayed the election in favor of Donald Trump, hysteria amongst Clintonites and NeverTrump Republicans spread like wildfire online as the volatile situation in the United States threatened to explode into outright conflict. Now, a growing number of Electoral College electors from both sides of the aisle have declared they will not vote — or cast their votes for Trump — until an investigation into Russian election interference can be performed.

Russian hackers and pro-Russia propaganda constitutes the twin, parallel ‘problem’ having befallen the U.S. — unnamed officials in the CIA ostensibly found after an analysis that Russian actors hacked Democrat Party files and provided information to Wikileaks — but provided literally zero evidence to back up the slanderous claim.

Russian President Vladimir Putin — recently himself named by President Obama for involvement in the unproven hacks — has categorically denied Russia meddled in the election or hacked the DNC. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, Judge Andrew Napolitano, and former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray have all — among many others — come forward to denounce the idea of Russian hackers as absurd and baseless.

(12-19-2016, 04:32 AM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: I think Alex is a tad bit pissed!   As we all should be!    





There's more here:  Videos: The Soros/Clinton Plan To Overthrow The Election

(12-18-2016, 10:58 PM)Sol Wrote: Desperate situations need desperate measures.

Let's not forget that the 'people' have had a say - and it was like a giant FUCK YOU written all over the place for the establishment to acknowledge.

Such a slogan as 'Let's Make America Great Again' , as banal as it seems, resounded everywhere across the globe.

So the losing parties are now scrambling just how they can fix such - as they would see it, a giant clusterfuck - from becoming reality.

Lies is now the desperate measure of the day.

Here in Canada, people are laughing off the "Russia hacked the elections" propaganda going around the various news media. They see it as a diversion from the real truth; the Clintons got nailed with wikileaks. THAT is the truth.

Assange has said that Russia wasn't the source but very few news outlets mention it.

In my lifetime, I have never seen so much disinformation, misinformation and fabrication coming from the news media. Ever.

The puppet masters aren't happy. And for anyone who has but half a brain, it's quite obvious.

Merry Christmas !! : )

(12-20-2016, 07:56 AM)Ninurta Wrote: ...Whomever DID do it deserves a fucking medal for uncovering a conspiracy against the American people...