This is an interesting Conspiracy.
The sinking of the Titanic and because J P Morgan and the Rockefellers and others wanted the creation of the Federal Reserve.
The main players at the time who could Stop The Creation of the Federal Reserve Bank were all on the Titanic.
J P Morgan and his Cronies all Canceled their tickets at the last moment.
Why?
Please watch this short video.
Outstanding!!!
I did not know about this one. The time frame is right.
(02-15-2022, 08:36 AM)Kenzo Wrote: [ -> ]Yeeh , but i think it was really Titanic sister ship Olympic that sink down. It was big fraud ...Lost revenues make them make s secret change of the ships
Did the Titanic Really Sink or was it Olympic?
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=10718]](http://rogue-nation3.com/attachment.php?aid=10718)
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=10719]](http://rogue-nation3.com/attachment.php?aid=10719)
WoW!
I hadn't heard anything about that.
Very Interesting.
(02-15-2022, 04:18 PM)guohua Wrote: [ -> ] (02-15-2022, 08:36 AM)Kenzo Wrote: [ -> ]Yeeh , but i think it was really Titanic sister ship Olympic that sink down. It was big fraud ...Lost revenues make them make s secret change of the ships
Did the Titanic Really Sink or was it Olympic?
WoW!
I hadn't heard anything about that.
Very Interesting.
Did you guys know that James Cameron,who did the movie Titanic, has literally done nothing but Time Travel Sci-Fi? It makes you wonder about why he did Titanic right?
Fun theory...that movie is about Time Travel as well. The main character Jack is from the future and he was sent back to ensure that the Titanic sank. Because if it didn't, they would have used it to transport passengers of the Lucitania, which was attacked by a German U-boat...and if that had happened, it would have pulled The United States into the war way earlier than they did, resulting in the saving of MILLIONS! And it's possible that we might have actually lost the war due to early entry and burnout, considering how close it was in the first place. It's pretty wild stuff too because Jack talks to Rose about riding a rollercoaster, which happened years after that date...he talks about visiting a particular lake which was actually man-made and didn't exist at that time either, it came later on...and also, he wore a rucksack that didn't exist for like another 30 years or so...it's pretty crazy when you think about it because James Cameron never skips a beat and every detail is important to him and I highly doubt this was a mistake.
@"Bloodstained"
Quote:Did you guys know that James Cameron,who did the movie Titanic, has literally done nothing but Time Travel Sci-Fi? It makes you wonder about why he did Titanic right?
Fun theory...that movie is about Time Travel as well. The main character Jack is from the future and he was sent back to ensure that the Titanic sank. Because if it didn't, they would have used it to transport passengers of the Lucitania, which was attacked by a German U-boat...and if that had happened, it would have pulled The United States into the war way earlier than they did, resulting in the saving of MILLIONS! And it's possible that we might have actually lost the war due to early entry and burnout, considering how close it was in the first place. It's pretty wild stuff too because Jack talks to Rose about riding a rollercoaster, which happened years after that date...he talks about visiting a particular lake which was actually man-made and didn't exist at that time either, it came later on...and also, he wore a rucksack that didn't exist for like another 30 years or so...it's pretty crazy when you think about it because James Cameron never skips a beat and every detail is important to him and I highly doubt this was a mistake.
No, I had never heard about that.
Interesting, where is this information found?
A book, a movie?
(02-15-2022, 04:18 PM)guohua Wrote: [ -> ] (02-15-2022, 08:36 AM)Kenzo Wrote: [ -> ]Yeeh , but i think it was really Titanic sister ship Olympic that sink down. It was big fraud ...Lost revenues make them make s secret change of the ships
Did the Titanic Really Sink or was it Olympic?
WoW!
I hadn't heard anything about that.
Very Interesting.
It's my understanding that repainting the Olympic as the Titanic was part of a massive insurance fraud scheme. The Olympic was older, close to end of service, but more insurance fraud could be gleaned from sinking a brand new ship, more serviceable and seaworthy, so less likely to go down, hence a better insurance risk.
With that said, there is nothing to preclude a two-for-one sort of deal and usher in the Federal reserve at the same time as making bank from insurance fraud, now is there? Rich folks are known for that sort of thing... it's part of how they get rich in the first place!
.