It was or is a Scam to make the Rich So Much More Richer!
You really want to hear the Truth?
Are YOU Sure?
Quote:EXCLUSIVE: BILDERBERG SCHEMES TO OVERTHROW TRUMP
Elitists begin effort to reverse America-first revolution and Brexit
Yes, Yes they are, Open Your Eyes!
Quote:Sources close to the elitist Bilderberg Group conference tell Infowars that globalists see their agenda as being in “deep trouble” and that Donald Trump poses a “dangerous” risk to the international order and must be brought to heel or turfed out of office.
Quote:The reason that three members of the Trump administration – HR McMaster, Wilbur Ross and Chris Liddell have been invited to attend this year’s meeting in Chantilly, Virginia is that Bilderberg thinks there is still a chance to put pressure on Trump to force him to back down on his America-first agenda.
With the U.S. about to pull out of the Paris climate agreement, Trump is “dangerously obsessed” with derailing the current world order, according to one Bilderberger, a fear that has intensified since Trump chided world leaders at the G7 summit last week.
Globalists are baffled as to Trump’s “erratic” style of governance and are panicked that he could undo decades of work they put in to build the new world order.
However, Bilderbergers still think Trump can be brought to his senses and taught “how the world really works,” a line that is typical of the arrogance that has come to epitomize the attitude of Bilderberg members over the years.
Given the highly unlikely scenario of Trump taking orders from Bilderberg, the only recourse left for the elite will be to turf him out of office.
Another Bilderberger is confident that Trump can be impeached, but only if Democrats regain control of Congress in 2018, in which case his days are “numbered”.
On the subject of Brexit, globalists still think that the UK’s exit from the European Union can be prevented. Elitists plan to make the withdrawal process as messy and as drawn out as possibly, taking as long as five years, before which point they hope to force through a vote in Parliament that will reverse the results of the referendum.
Source
Yes it's all real.
The Rich Elites and The Hollywood Elites are all Whining that their Illegal are worried about deportation, who's going to mow their lawns and wash their clothes and dishes and cook for them and clean their homes and swimming pools?
Americans That's Who, but of-course they'd have to pay a living wage.
Quote:However, Bilderbergers still think Trump can be brought to his senses and taught “how the world really works,” a line that is typical of the arrogance that has come to epitomize the attitude of Bilderberg members over the years.
Or... Trump might just show THEM how it works! He's the first to come along that isn't in their debt for anything and it scares them shitless!
I urge people to watch that video; it's really good... and important info.
Good.
Global warming is NOT in agreement by 97% of the scientists.
The bogus number was derived by a blogger in Australia who cherry picked numerouse thesis, yunno the ones that are pro-GW.
And came up with the far-fetched number that he did, of 97%.
When others went behind him and studied ALL the various thesis on GW, the statistics dropped down to about fifty-fifty ....half of the scientists were not behind GW.
Also, Trump is not the first President to pull out of a treaty that has to do with climate change.
And yes, the outrage was the same when Pres.Bush decided to pull out of the Keyoto treaty.
The last time a US president dumped a global climate deal
But as one guy stated, you do not need to be part of a 'treaty' to tackle emissions.
Sadly .... china still in it ..... thought china was smarter than that ..... looks like they eating too much western shit ..... an india crying they want everyone else to pay em ......
World leaders react after Trump rejects Paris climate deal.
Joint statement by France, Germany and Italy says deal cannot be renegotiated, while other
countries reaffirm commitment to carbon reduction.
'European leaders dismissed Donald Trump’s claim that the Paris climate accord can be renegotiated
after the US president announced he will pull out of the deal struck in 2015 to seek better terms.
Shortly after Trump’s announcement, the leaders of France, Germany and Italy released a joint statement
rejecting Trump’s assertion that the climate deal can be redrafted.
“We deem the momentum generated in Paris in December 2015 irreversible, and we firmly believe that
the Paris agreement cannot be renegotiated, since it is a vital instrument for our planet, societies and
economies,” said German chancellor Angela Merkel, French president Emmanuel Macron and Italian
prime minister Paolo Gentiloni.
The three leaders called on their allies to speed up efforts to combat climate change and promise to do
more to help developing countries adapt.
Merkel called Trump immediately after he delivered his announcement to personally express her regret at
his decision, her spokesman, Steffen Seibert, said on Twitter.
During the conversation she stressed that Germany would stick to the agreement.
He added in another tweet in English: “Chancellor Merkel disappointed w/Pres. Trump’s decision.
Now more than ever we will work for global policies that save our planet,” he wrote.
Immediately after her call to Trump, Merkel telephoned Macron, he said, and they agreed that “Germany
and France will grasp at new initiatives in order to ensure the climate agreement is a success”.
In a televised address in French and English, Macron said that Trump had “committed an error for the
interests of his country, his people and a mistake for the future of our planet”.
“I tell you firmly tonight: we will not renegotiate a less ambitious accord. There is no way,” said Macron.
“Don’t be mistaken on climate: there is no plan B because there is no planet B.”...'
SOURCE:
Oh for a second there I though the important part was saving the world from a climate catastrophe.
Right there, Macron and his gang have let the cat out of the bag!
Looks like yer' gonna have to do it with Euros instead of dollars.
What You're Not Being Told About the Paris Climate Agreement...
Quote:(ANTIMEDIA Op-Ed) President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Accord has thrown the world into a blazing furnace full of weeping and gnashing of teeth—or the political world, at least, has been thrown into a fiery tizzy.
The front page of the New York Daily News reads “TRUMP TO WORLD: DROP DEAD, Decides to hell with science, Earth’s future.”
Quote:We're revolutionizing the news industry, but we need your help! Click here to get started.
Former President Barack Obama broke his silence, saying, in part, that with this decision the Trump administration “joins a small handful of nations that reject the future.”
Former Secretary of State John Kerry lambasted Trump’s decision as “an ignorant, cynical appeal to an anti-science, special-interest faction,” as well as saying, “This choice will rightly be remembered as one of the most shameful any president has made.”
And the list goes on and on and on.
To hear these people talk, apparently, the human race can only progress into the future and create new industries and technologies if we are flogged into it begrudgingly by our ‘wise’ government and corporate leaders.
Are we really ready to presume what human society will look like several decades from now? Are we seriously expected to believe that government action is the only way to tackle the problem of climate change? If we fail to use the heavy hand of government to brave the future, why should we assume the human race will fail to innovate and adapt to complex challenges on its own?
Imagine, if you will, a world where you cannot turn to governments to solve problems such as climate change.
How would you achieve your righteous ends? Would you simply do nothing if you could not turn to government?
I ask because too often, noble goals serve as a Trojan horse for political control.
Governments often present us with grand solutions as gifts for our real and perceived problems, but once inside the gates, they proceed to saddle our communities with a slew of regulations, mandates, taxes, diktats, quotas, subsidies, penalties and the like. The cursed gift of government, it seems, is always a central plan that conflates voluntary cooperation, collective action, and even community itself with centralized political control.
But we do not need the trappings of central planning to solve our collective problems. Society can run itself, thank you very much; it needs no single creator or director.
Society already has great gifts for solving complex human issues—individual liberty, initiative, and ingenuity, along with the free and open exchange of goods and ideas—and we need not sacrifice these liberal benefactors of the modern world to dream impossible dreams and fight unbeatable foes. The greatest achievements of the human race have not come from government committees and accords, but from intrepid yet everyday individuals working in concert to tackle the unknown and implacable through innovation and persuasion.
Yet, rather than allowing people to freely choose and coordinate their own plans in our common struggle against nature, too many people first brand other people as the problem. Too many would rather rely on commanding and controlling others to fix humanity’s wicked problems than freely solve the problem themselves. Too many conflate the government’s failure to act as society signaling we are resigned to do nothing—thus, the weeping and gnashing of teeth over Donald Trump’s recent decision.
I find all the hysterics and tears of hubris laughable. This mindset deserves to be mocked for its lack of imagination and obsequious acceptance of corporate cronyism and global governance as the only path to the future; it deserves to be mocked for claiming the singular appearance of “doing something” (without much effect) is better than actually tackling the problem from many different directions; it deserves to be mocked even on environmental activist grounds as a list of empty promises and half-measures, as a perversion of the cause, just as a free trader may mock NAFTA or an anti-war activist may mock Barack Obama receiving the Nobel Peace Prize; and it deserves to be mocked for how little it respects the ability of average people to change their station and adapt to the changing world on their own without the pretentious prodding of government leaders.
I’m willing to bet the existence of the entire human race that without the Paris Climate Accord, we will rise to meet the challenge of climate change successfully. Further, if we would shrink government generally—i.e. give average people the freedom to think and trade as they wish in the energy sector or any other industry—then by the accord’s own target year of 2100, the market (which is simply free people trading and producing as they wish based on their own enlightenment) will have reduced carbon emissions and given us new technologies beyond the wildest dreams of those now bemoaning the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord.
In fact, the U.S. clean energy sector has grown leaps and bounds in only the last few years despite the lack of a robust central plan. Coal is already giving way to cleaner forms of energy and will continue to do so no matter what Donald Trump promises the miners of West Virginia. And the fact that there is this burgeoning clean energy industry does not mean we should engage in crony capitalism and wealth redistribution between nations to “prime the pump.” Picking winners and losers in the clean energy sector is just as bad as doing so in any other sector (including the fossil fuels industry.). Must we really kowtow to corporations and their client states by granting them government privileges and sweetheart deals to create new technologies they already have enough incentive to create anyway?
No, if we wish to solve the climate change problem, I suggest we try, first and foremost, to create products and services that will actually make people’s lives better immediately rather than imposing immense costs upfront with no clear time horizon wherein we reap the benefits. Just as one need not convince people of evolution before they take vaccines or life-saving drugs, there’s no need to convince people of the science of climate change if you can sell them a better, cheaper, cleaner, and more practical way to power their lives. Shaming, lecturing, and trying to control people’s behavior through the political process for unclear results and opaque benefits is not serving this cause well, as sound as the science and as noble as the cause may be.
Ironically enough, Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris accord may very well usher in a new era of initiative absent the federal government. After Trump’s decision, many industry leaders, mayors, and governors pledged to pursue solutions to climate change absent the federal government. As the CEO of General Electric Jeff Immelt tweeted, “Climate change is real. Industry must now lead and not depend on government.”
That’s the spirit, Jeff, but my only question is: what the hell have you been waiting for?
Industry and the people of the United States should have been saying this long ago. It’s time to stop looking to central governments and global committees—whether the issue is climate change or poverty or education or whatever—to make our world a better place.
The time for us to pursue the future ourselves is long overdue, and it would be a shame to sell ourselves and the future short because we’re too busy bickering over political power.
Source
Yeah, what he said.
Have You Heard?
Quote:Pelosi: Trump ‘dishonoring God’ by withdrawing from Paris agreement
Yes, I think that would be Their God Obama.
Quote:California Democrat Rep. Nancy Pelosi said at her weekly news conference Thursday that President Donald Trump was turning his back on children and dishonoring God for withdrawing the United States from the Paris climate agreement.
Really? You Are A Wacky Bitch?
Quote:Pelosi claimed that the Paris agreement would have created “an explosion” of green energy jobs, and keep America the preeminent country for “jobs of the future.” But she did not elaborate further on how the statistics were false.
Pelosi also said that the issue of climate change is one of health, national, and personal security.
Every Green Company I Know Of Has Gone Bankrupt.
Quote:“The Bible tells us that to minister to the needs of God’s creation is an act of worship,” Pelosi said. “To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us, and that is just what we’re doing by walking away from the accord.”
Pelosi also questioned whether Trump’s grandchildren will even be able to breathe air, asking “how is he ever going to explain to his grandchildren what he did to the air they breathe — assuming they breathe air?”
Source
I guess there is No such thing as the Separation Of Church and State in Pelosi's Little Brain.
The air is Bad Enough with you progressive-Liberal Mouth Breather's.
God invented windmills so that Russian mineral Barons would go out of business.
I don't think as anything to do with Pelosi's husband's 2016 investments in solar panels,
has it?
(06-03-2017, 05:26 PM)BIAD Wrote: [ -> ]God invented windmills so that Russian mineral Barons would go out of business.
I don't think as anything to do with Pelosi's husband's 2016 investments in solar panels,
has it?
Yes and other Elites with their investments into Solar and Tidal Wave.
The Solar Panel is a Scam, you still pay an electric bill plus the lease on the panels.
Sure it's a reduced electric bill, but it works out the same after the lease payment.
People in Arizona found that out, even with our 300 or more days of sunlight, they still pay and don't get a reimbursement from the electric companies.
When they came knocking on our door, my husband told them to go and F*ck Themselves.
Our neighbor across the street leaves every summer for about 5 or 6 months and goes north to Flagstaff az.
They had those panels installed.
Before the panels they'd end up only paying the minimum fee for their electric, because the just shut everything off and no A/C or anything electric was on.
Now they have to pay the lease fee for the solar panels $220. plus the $75. minimum electric fee.
Dumb Asses!
My husband warned them put they believed the Bull-Shit that if they left, I the electricity from the Panels would be extra money because they weren't using electric at home.
That is a $22. dollar check returned to them each month they are away.
That won't fill one of our cars or our truck.
Waste Of Money!
/Rant Over\
See all kinds of charts and graphs "they" don't want you to see:
Too many to post here, so just click on the
LINK
Well maybe they should Ban those wind turbines.
Quote:Environmentalists outraged after ‘green’ wind turbines murder family of whales
That's right, those wind turbines used to create electricity are killing whales.
In California those wind turbines they use kill birds.
But do you hear the Progressive-Liberal Screaming about that? NO!
Now if you paid to go on Safari and killed a Lion or something, the Liberals would want you Persecuted as a Murderer!
Quote:Some environmentalists are saying wind turbines pose a threat to whales after a family of minke whales were found dead in the United Kingdom.
According to reports by the Times (London) and Daily Caller, a young minke whale was found dead in the United Kingdom on May 20. Its mother was found dead on a nearby beach the same day, and a third whale washed ashore on May 21. It’s believed the three whales were part of the same family.
According to marine wildlife experts, the whales were likely disoriented by nearby wind turbines, which can affect the sonar whales use to navigate.
“My personal opinion is that [the whales’ deaths] could be a consequence of wind farms and the amount of sand in the water,” said John Cresswell, chairman of the Felixstowe Volunteer Coast Patrol Rescue Service, according to the Times. “If you stop the boat off the coast you can feel the vibrations and hear the noise.”
“There are studies that show that the sounds created by the operational noise of the turbines create vibrations under that may in fact disorient marine mammals like whales,” Bonnie Brady, director of the Long Island Commercial Fishing Association, told the Daily Caller.
Source
(06-03-2017, 09:50 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: [ -> ]See all kinds of charts and graphs "they" don't want you to see:
Too many to post here, so just click on the LINK
Mystic Wanderer, You ARE a Evil Denier Of Climate Change and Because of that, your Grandchildren will have No Air To Breath!!!!!!!! EVIL!!!!!!!!!!
Me To!
Quote:Nancy Pelosi Launches VILE Attack On Trump’s GRANDCHILDREN
Quote: “The question I have for Donald Trump, as a mother … of five and a grandmother of nine, is how is he ever going to explain to his grandchildren what he did to the air they breathe — assuming they breathe air. And I have to assume that is the case,” Nancy said during her speech.
She went on to call the event that took place yesterday concerning the climate issue an “embarrassment to our country” followed with a comment how it should also be an embarrassment for him for how he answers to his grandchildren.
Link
Remember the Pope went to the White House She says and talked about the Dangers of Air Pollution!? I think the Pope should stick to talking about stuff he knows something about, The Bible and Pedophiles!
Liberals will tell us those are no real facts but Fake and that 97% of ALL Scientist Agree With Them.
@"Guohua" posted,
Quote:Environmentalists outraged after ‘green’ wind turbines murder family of whales
I was taking a sip of coffee as I came across this (above) and literally got strangled!
I mean... WTH?!
Did anyone know that the US has paid over One Billion Dollars into the Scam and the Top Three Polluters have paid Nothing!?
Quote:The United States contributed $1 billion to the global Green Climate Fund, but the world's top polluters contributed nothing, David Asman reported.
Asman said on "Forbes on Fox" that China, Russia and India contributed no money to the Green Climate Fund, yet that international community pressured the U.S. to join the Paris Climate Accord.
Steve Forbes said that the billion-dollar payment is another reason why President Trump was smart to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris agreement.
"It would have a devastating impact on our economy," Forbes said.
He said that America already reduces Carbon emissions better than any other nation in the world.
Mike Ozanian pointed out that the funds for the Paris accord would be controlled by the United Nations, which often works against U.S. domestic interests.
Source
Obama and your Tax Dollars, it's not now and never will come out of the Elites Wallets!
So,,, Do you live in one of these 10 cities states that will be using your Tax Dollars to pay the Fees for America and Obama to the Paris Climate Agreement Scam.
Quote:At least 10 states and a slew of U.S. cities have signaled that they are committing to the Paris climate accord despite President Trump's decision last week to withdraw the U.S. from the pact.
The 10 states that have signed onto the alliance include California, New York, Washington, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, Virginia, Oregon and Hawaii. All of the states governors are Democrats except those representing Massachusetts and Vermont.
Nine other states and Washington, D.C. have also reportedly said that they plan to abide by the guidelines of the Paris agreement.
Major cities including New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and Philadelphia have also indicated that they will also do so as well.
Some of the governors are part of a group that also includes companies, mayors and university presidents that are planning to present a plan to the United Nations that would meet the greenhouse-gas emission targets under the Paris climate agreement that President Trump pulled the U.S. out of on Thursday, The New York Times reported.
Source
Say Goodbye to your Money, they'll get it, they may have commended their state and cities to pay, but they'll personally never give a dime of their monies, it'll be all your money leaving your hands to theirs.
The Elite's will never pay, just collect a Commission.
The Truth of the situation.
(06-02-2017, 08:15 AM)Daitengu Wrote: [ -> ]Sadly .... china still in it ..... thought china was smarter than that ..... looks like they eating too much western shit ..... an india crying they want everyone else to pay em ......
Well, to be fair, China has no reason to pull out of it. it allows then to keep on churining out more and more emissions for the next several years while curtailing the emission of everyone else but India, which puts China at an economic advantage versus the rest of the world.
Sweet deal. hell, If I was China, I'd stay in it too! It stacks the deck in their favor!
(06-04-2017, 12:11 AM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: [ -> ]@"Guohua" posted,
Quote:Environmentalists outraged after ‘green’ wind turbines murder family of whales
I was taking a sip of coffee as I came across this (above) and literally got strangled!
I mean... WTH?!
Exactly.
"Murder is defined as "unjustifiable homicide".
"Homicide" is defined as "the killing of a human being".
Therefore, "murder" is the "unjustified killing of a human being".
One cannot MURDER a non-human entity, by definition.
Don't rant at me, direct any rants to Webster, and the English language.
.