If you really want the Truth About Who the Russians Own and How They May Have Influenced an Election and Not For Trump, Read this book. “Clinton Cash”
Let me give you of the details.
Quote:Hillary OK'd sale as cash flowed to foundation, Bill's pockets.
Tens of millions of dollars from uranium investors flowed into the Clinton Foundation, and Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank tied to the Kremlin before Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton helped decide whether to approve the sale to the Russian government of a company that held one-fifth of America’s uranium capacity.
T
hat’s the “deal” that Donald Trump referenced in a tweet Tuesday morning in which he essentially said that if Congress really wants to find evidence of U.S. politicians colluding with the Russians, it should investigate the $145 million in donations the Clintons’ received from uranium investors before Russia’s energy agency Rostatom secured the purchase of Uranium One.
Trump tweeted: “Why isn’t the House Intelligence Committee looking into the Bill & Hillary deal that allowed big Uranium to go to Russia, Russian speech.”
He followed up with: “… money to Bill, the Hillary Russian “reset,” praise of Russia by Hillary, or Podesta Russian Company. Trump Russia story is a hoax. #MAGA!”
Meanwhile, Congress is examining allegations that the president and his aides colluded with Russia to defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
The 2010 deal for a majority stake of Canadian-based Uranium One – which required approval from Clinton’s State Department and eight other federal agencies – and its plausible connection to major donations to the Clinton Foundation was exposed by author Peter Schweizer in his book “Clinton Cash and confirmed in a 3,000 word, front-page story by the New York Times.
Former Uranium One chairman Ian Telfer was among several individuals connected to the deal who made donations to the Clinton Foundation. Telfer made four foreign donations totaling $2.35 million, the Times reported.
The donations flowed as the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013. Snopes and other “fact checkers” who insist there was no quid pro quo have argued that most of the donations were made in 2008, before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state. But she was running for president at that time.
The origin of the deal traced back to 2005, when mining financier Frank Giustra traveled with Bill Clinton to work out an agreement with the government of Kazakhstan for mining rights.
Giustra has donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.
In June 2010, shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Bill Clinton personally received a speaking fee of $500,000 from a Kremlin-tied Russian investment bank connected to the uranium deal.
he Times pointed out that the Canadian tax records show the contributions to the Clinton Foundation were not publicly disclosed, which violated an agreement Clinton signed with the Obama administration when she became secretary of state to disclose all foreign donations.
Meanwhile, the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group reported last week Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman, John Podesta, may have opened himself up to a Russian “influence campaign” designed to temper his views of the Kremlin. Podesta possibly violated federal law when he failed to fully disclose his membership on the executive board of an energy company that accepted millions from a Vladimir Putin-connected Russian government fund.
There is Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo Much More in the Article.
Really Needs To be Read.
There is a Very Clear Picture that I think Shows The Connection between the Clinton Crime Family and Russia.
So the next time a Supporter of The Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez says, “What we know now is that the involvement of the Russians in the United States election, the involvement of the Russians and potentially the Trump administration..”....... Just say, The Clinton and America Uranium Sold To Russia for Funds Transferred to the Clinton Foundation.
Then Point Then To This link.Link
Quote:John Podesta, national chairman of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, may have opened himself up to a Russian “influence campaign” designed to temper his views of the Kremlin, The Daily Caller News Foundation (TheDCNF) Investigative Group has learned.
(04-01-2017, 06:15 AM)guohua Wrote: If you really want the Truth About Who the Russians Own and How They May Have Influenced an Election and Not For Trump, Read this book. “Clinton Cash”
Let me give you of the details.
Quote:Hillary OK'd sale as cash flowed to foundation, Bill's pockets.
Tens of millions of dollars from uranium investors flowed into the Clinton Foundation, and Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank tied to the Kremlin before Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton helped decide whether to approve the sale to the Russian government of a company that held one-fifth of America’s uranium capacity.
T
hat’s the “deal” that Donald Trump referenced in a tweet Tuesday morning in which he essentially said that if Congress really wants to find evidence of U.S. politicians colluding with the Russians, it should investigate the $145 million in donations the Clintons’ received from uranium investors before Russia’s energy agency Rostatom secured the purchase of Uranium One.
Trump tweeted: “Why isn’t the House Intelligence Committee looking into the Bill & Hillary deal that allowed big Uranium to go to Russia, Russian speech.”
He followed up with: “… money to Bill, the Hillary Russian “reset,” praise of Russia by Hillary, or Podesta Russian Company. Trump Russia story is a hoax. #MAGA!”
Meanwhile, Congress is examining allegations that the president and his aides colluded with Russia to defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
The 2010 deal for a majority stake of Canadian-based Uranium One – which required approval from Clinton’s State Department and eight other federal agencies – and its plausible connection to major donations to the Clinton Foundation was exposed by author Peter Schweizer in his book “Clinton Cash and confirmed in a 3,000 word, front-page story by the New York Times.
Former Uranium One chairman Ian Telfer was among several individuals connected to the deal who made donations to the Clinton Foundation. Telfer made four foreign donations totaling $2.35 million, the Times reported.
The donations flowed as the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013. Snopes and other “fact checkers” who insist there was no quid pro quo have argued that most of the donations were made in 2008, before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state. But she was running for president at that time.
The origin of the deal traced back to 2005, when mining financier Frank Giustra traveled with Bill Clinton to work out an agreement with the government of Kazakhstan for mining rights.
Giustra has donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.
In June 2010, shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Bill Clinton personally received a speaking fee of $500,000 from a Kremlin-tied Russian investment bank connected to the uranium deal.
he Times pointed out that the Canadian tax records show the contributions to the Clinton Foundation were not publicly disclosed, which violated an agreement Clinton signed with the Obama administration when she became secretary of state to disclose all foreign donations.
Meanwhile, the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group reported last week Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman, John Podesta, may have opened himself up to a Russian “influence campaign” designed to temper his views of the Kremlin. Podesta possibly violated federal law when he failed to fully disclose his membership on the executive board of an energy company that accepted millions from a Vladimir Putin-connected Russian government fund.
There is Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo Much More in the Article.
Really Needs To be Read.
There is a Very Clear Picture that I think Shows The Connection between the Clinton Crime Family and Russia.
So the next time a Supporter of The Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez says, “What we know now is that the involvement of the Russians in the United States election, the involvement of the Russians and potentially the Trump administration..”....... Just say, The Clinton and America Uranium Sold To Russia for Funds Transferred to the Clinton Foundation.
Then Point Then To This link.Link
Quote:John Podesta, national chairman of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, may have opened himself up to a Russian “influence campaign” designed to temper his views of the Kremlin, The Daily Caller News Foundation (TheDCNF) Investigative Group has learned.
Yep and the old saying of, the best defense is a good offence comes to mind... I hope you and I live long enough to see justice served... I am really tired of all the propaganda being spewed by idiots.
If Only That Was Real,,,,,, If Only!
Sad to say it's Only Wishful Thinking.
If the above video was Real, I'd Have To,,,,,,,,, But Down Your Drinks,,,, THERE IS A GOD!
04-01-2017, 04:11 PM (This post was last modified: 04-01-2017, 04:16 PM by Mystic Wanderer.)
Quote:Meanwhile, Congress is examining allegations that the president and his aides colluded with Russia to defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
If Only That Was Real,,,,,, If Only!
Sad to say it's Only Wishful Thinking.
If the above video was Real, I'd Have To,,,,,,,,, But Down Your Drinks,,,, THERE IS A GOD!
Give me just five minutes of blissful thinking before I have to come back to reality, okay?
06-25-2017, 08:58 PM (This post was last modified: 06-25-2017, 08:59 PM by guohua.)
Bump, Bump for the Update!
We all know from the very beginning who was behind this Bullshit Russian Dossier and Report.
Even though some tried to Vouch for the Credibility of a retired British spy Who, was nothing more than a Paid Trash Collector for the Democrats. Yes, Yes, it's all coming undone for the DNC and Obama and The Clinton's.
You'll read that this So-Called Firm had Donations to the Clinton's.
Quote:A secretive Washington firm that commissioned the dubious intelligence dossier on Donald Trump is stonewalling congressional investigators trying to learn more about its connections to the Democratic Party.
The Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month threatened to subpoena the firm, Fusion GPS, after it refused to answer questions and provide records to the panel identifying who financed the error-ridden dossier, which was circulated during the election and has sparked much of the Russia scandal now engulfing the White House.
What is the company hiding? Fusion GPS describes itself as a “research and strategic intelligence firm” founded by “three former Wall Street Journal investigative reporters.” But congressional sources says it’s actually an opposition-research group for Democrats, and the founders, who are more political activists than journalists, have a pro-Hillary, anti-Trump agenda.
“These weren’t mercenaries or hired guns,” a congressional source familiar with the dossier probe said. “These guys had a vested personal and ideological interest in smearing Trump and boosting Hillary’s chances of winning the White House.”
Fusion GPS was on the payroll of an unidentified Democratic ally of Clinton when it hired a long-retired British spy to dig up dirt on Trump.
The article is not done yet.
Quote:More, federal records show a key co-founder and partner in the firm was a Hillary Clinton donor and supporter of her presidential campaign.
In September 2016, while Fusion GPS was quietly shopping the dirty dossier on Trump around Washington, its co-founder and partner Peter R. Fritsch contributed at least $1,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund and the Hillary For America campaign, Federal Election Commission data show. His wife also donated money to Hillary’s campaign. Property records show that in June 2016, as Clinton allies bankrolled Fusion GPS, Fritsch bought a six-bedroom, five-bathroom home in Bethesda, Md., for $2.3 million.
Fritsch did not respond to requests for comment. A lawyer for Fusion GPS said the firm’s work is confidential.
Only Confidential if you're a Conservative!
They are a Democrat Funded Organization, that is as Plan as the Nose On Your Face.
Anyone who actually believed this trump and Russian Connection had to be a Fool!
I said it from the beginning, this was all Made Up Lies and Bullshit!
They were trying to make their report sound Credible by saying that an Ex British Spy had the Dossier and Contacts in Russia.
That was all Lies and My Husband said so himself, after the Supposed Ex British Spy was named Christopher Steele. A Nobody!
They also had ties to Mexico and LOVED Obama;s NAFTA!
Quote:Fritsch, who served as the Journal’s bureau chief in Mexico City and has lectured at the liberal Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute, married into a family with Mexican business interests. His wife, Beatriz Garcia, formerly worked as an executive at Grupo Dina, a manufacturer of trucks and buses in Mexico City that benefits from NAFTA, which Trump opposes.
There's More,,,,,
Quote:Fritsch’s Fusion GPS partner Thomas Catan, who grew up in Britain, once edited a business magazine in Mexico, moreover.
A third founding partner, Glenn Simpson,is reported to have shared dark views of both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump. Before joining Fusion GPS, Simpson did opposition research for a former Clinton White House operative.
Now, let us not forget Loretta Lynch
Quote:The FBI received a copy of the Democrat-funded dossier in August, during the heat of the campaign, and is said to have contracted in October to pay Steele $50,000 to help corroborate the dirt on Trump — a relationship that “raises substantial questions about the independence” of the bureau in investigating Trump, warned Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.
Senate investigators are demanding to see records of communications between Fusion GPS and the FBI and the Justice Department, including any contacts with former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, now under congressional investigation for possibly obstructing the Hillary Clinton email probe, and deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe, who is under investigation by the Senate and the Justice inspector general for failing to recuse himself despite financial and political connections to the Clinton campaign through his Democrat activist wife. Senate investigators have singled out McCabe as the FBI official who negotiated with Steele. Source
You did read that part,,,,,, Democrat Funded Dossier!!!! Oh and to pay their Spy, $50,000.
Yes there is much more of the article to read to get a better understanding of Just How Corrupt the Democrats Really Are!
So, come back and argue your losing point again,,,,,,, Liberals.
I told you, there'd be NO Trump Impeachment!
Trump 2020
06-25-2017, 09:11 PM (This post was last modified: 06-25-2017, 09:11 PM by BIAD.)
And by the way...
Trey Gowdy, new Oversight Committee chair, plans to deemphasize Russia investigation.
'WASHINGTON — Trey Gowdy, the new head of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, says he plans to turn the committee away from its investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, a departure from his predecessor's aggressive approach.
The South Carolina Republican and former prosecutor believes much of the Russia investigation belongs under the special counsel or other congressional committees. He says he would prefer to have the Oversight Committee focus on some of the less headline grabbing, but still important issues such as overseeing the Census and National Archives...' USA Today:
Oh my, he mustn't believe what's in the newspapers!
Quote:Three CNN Employees Resign Over Retracted Story on Russia Ties
Yes you read that right and here's the article and now @"Mystic Wanderer" has an update for our Social Media.
Watch the Liberals Heads Explode!!!
Quote:Three CNN employees have handed in their resignation over a retracted story linking President Trump to Russia, the network announced Monday.
Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit, have all left CNN. “In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignation of the employees involved in the story’s publication,” a network spokesperson said in a statement Monday.
On Thursday, CNN investigative reporter Thomas Frank published a report involving an investigation of a Russian investment fund with potential ties to several associates of President Donald Trump.
According to CNN, an internal investigation found that “some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published.” Citing a single unnamed source, the story reported that Congress was investigating a “Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials. Source
They Lied and I think CNN got caught in the Act of Supporting their Agenda with False Accusations against President Trump, so in-order to save their Asses, they forced those three to resign.
JMHO
They Lied and I think CNN got caught in the Act of Supporting their Agenda with False Accusations against President Trump, so in-order to save their Asses, they forced those three to resign.
JMHO
That's what I think too. Use to happen at my place of work all the time. Either resign, or get fired.
06-27-2017, 09:52 AM (This post was last modified: 06-27-2017, 10:16 AM by BIAD.)
Quote:Bombshell Video: CNN Producer Admits Russia Narrative is a Witch Hunt, Good For Ratings.
'In a bombshell video released by Project Veritas, CNN Producer John Bonifield is caught on a hidden camera admitting that the network’s narrative about President Donald Trump being involved with Russia is “mostly bullshit,” and admitting that instructions to spread the fake news comes straight from their CEO, Jeff Zucker.
The hard-hitting video comes one day after it was announced that three people resigned from CNN after the network was forced to retract a fake news story based on an anonymous source about Anthony Scaramucci, a close ally of Trump, having ties to a Russian investment bank.
Speaking generally about the Russian hysteria, which is heavily peddled by the network, Bonifield admits that they do not have any “giant proof” of wrongdoing. “I mean, it’s mostly bullshit right now,” Bonifield says. “Like, we don’t have any giant proof.["]
Bonifield goes on to mock ethics in reporting. “It’s a business, people are like the media has an ethical phssssss…All the nice cutesy little ethics that used to get talked about in journalism school you’re just like, that’s adorable. That’s adorable. This is a business.”
The network, unlike MSNBC or Fox News, still pretends to be unbiased — yet are quick to point the fingers at others for reporting “fake news.” “Trump is good for business right now,” he admits. It doesn’t end there.
Bonifield explains that orders for CNN reporters being ordered to relentlessly cover the “mostly bullshit” Russian narrative comes straight from the top, telling an anecdote about Zucker ordering reporters to keep covering the alleged collusion.
“Just to give you some context, President Trump pulled out of the climate accords and for a day and a half we covered the climate accords. And the CEO of CNN (Jeff Zucker) said in our internal meeting, he said good job everybody covering the climate accords, but we’re done with that, let’s get back to Russia,” Bonifield says.
Bonifield also admits that he believes President Trump is correcting in calling a witch hunt.
“I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the President committed a crime,” Bonifield states. “I just feel like they don’t really have it but they want to keep digging. And so I think the President is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me. You have no smoking gun, you have no real proof.”
In a 2015 post titled ‘What Happened to Journalistic Ethics at CNN?’ by Dr. Timothy Wheeler, the director of Doctors for Responsible Gun Ownership, he detailed his experience being interviewed by Bonifield, and how it was immediately clear that he was there to push an agenda and not just get the story.
“Let me say this, CNN, in front of the whole country. Your reporters faked that story today. In a wide-ranging, hour-long interview [Elizabeth] Cohen and Bonifield grilled me, couching their own biases in the form of loaded questions to me. It felt more like being interrogated on a witness stand by two hostile lawyers trying to wring a confession out of me,” Wheeler wrote.
Wheeler added that CNN management should be ashamed, as “these two presented themselves to me as reporters, but are in fact unabashed political advocates.”
Investigative journalist James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas has been working to expose the mainstream media for what they are. During a press conference from CPAC in February, he offered a $10,000 reward for content exposing media malfeasance.
“Project Veritas is determined to expose malfeasance, corruption and wrongdoing,” O’Keefe said during the release. “We want to become a destination where citizen journalists can come forward, work with us and make a real impact.
That’s why today, we’re announcing a $10,000 reward for anyone that comes forward with legally obtained materials exposing media malfeasance. If you have hidden audio recordings, video tapes or documents inside of a newsroom or media institution–and the material is good enough–I will pay you $10,000.”
Though there is a reward being offered, the latest release came from an undercover journalist — not a leaker, Project Veritas Communications Director Steve Gordon told Big League Politics.
O’Keefe also released 119 hours of secretly recorded raw audio from a source within the Atlanta CNN headquarters at the time of the reward announcement.The recordings, which were released in a Wikileaks style dump, was captured in 2009 by a source identified only as “Miss X.”
Richard Griffiths, who is now CNN’s Vice President and Senior Editorial Director, was caught in those recordings explaining that the role of journalists is to “aid the afflicted and afflict the comfortable,” instead of just fairly and accurately reporting the news.
“Tell a story. Tell what’s going on. There’s a secondary corollary to that, right? Aid the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. To a degree, right? Is that not part of the traditional role of a journalist,” Griffiths is heard saying. “It’s actually one of the things I can be most proud of as a journalist. You know we try to show the ugly side of humanity so we can do something about it. It’s hard, very hard.”
Other clips from the recordings included discussions openly speaking about the network’s profound liberal bias.
“To report not on facts, but instead on narratives that yield high ratings, is exactly the definition of fake news,” James O’Keefe said in a press release. “We said we are going after the media, and there is a lot more to come.”
Following their recent scandal over the fake news about Scaramucci, the network has put in place a new set of rules for covering stories about Russia.
“No one should publish any content involving Russia without coming to me and Jason [Farkas],” CNNMoney executive editor Rich Barbieri said in an email to staff. “This applies to social, video, editorial, and MoneyStream. No exceptions,” the email added. “I will lay out a workflow Monday.”
The video was originally scheduled to be released at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, but was released nine hours early after being leaked. O’Keefe told Rebel Media journalist Laura Loomer that the leak was “all part of the plan.”...'
This is probably the best evidence yet in the public domain of how 'Journalists' -and I use that term loosely,
have and are still continuing to collude to maintain a narrative that suits their purpose.
There are private forums where Journalists meet and discuss their objectives by choosing reports, creating
reports and slanting a real event to better their personal and funded goals.
Many of these Liberal scribes no longer believe what they're doing is righteous, they know it can work because
of the simple concept that anything written in a newspaper and online, anything broadcast via radio or television,
is always assumed to have some merit due to the public socially-brainwashed perception that a Journalist must
adhere to an ethical discipline.
The same discipline they mock in the above article.
Their chosen narrative can be seen as having a multi-faceted purpose. It assists in keeping pressure on those who
rebel against a certain established manner. There are serious powerful forces in the world that -I will use the word
'manipulate' global economies, political and social changes in countries and by using conduits of information -such
as the media, it makes the running of the world smoother.
It also keeps these hacks in employment and feeds their privileged egos.
This has gone on for a very long time and I fear it will be an even longer time before it's eradicated in the media
world.
.....................................
Here's an email discovered in the WikiLeaks cache.
Quote:RE: Press Dinners - Full Info
From:jesse@jesseferguson.com
To: amandarenteria@gmail.com, huma@hrcoffice.com, marlondmarshall@gmail.com, robbymook2015@gmail.com,
nmerrill@hrcoffice.com, jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com more
CC: marissa.astor@icloud.com
Date: 2015-04-07 12:28
Subject: RE: Press Dinners - Full Info
Here is the current RSVP list to the Thursday Night (4/9) dinner at Podesta’s. As a reminder, this is with the 25 reporters
more closely following HRC (aka the future bus).
Yes ABC – Liz Kreutz
Yes AP – Julie Pace
Yes AP - Ken Thomas
Yes AP - Lisa Lerer
AURN - April Ryan
Yes Bloomberg - Jennifer Epstein
Yes Buzzfeed - Ruby Cramer
Yes CBS – Steve Chagaris
Yes CNBC - John Harwood
Yes CNN - Dan Merica
Yes Huffington Post - Amanda Terkel
NO (Panama) LAT - Mike Memoli
Yes LAT - Evan Handler
Yes McClatchy - Anita Kumar
Yes MSNBC - Alex Seitz-Wald
Yes National Journal - Emily Schultheis
Yes NBC – Mark Murray
Yes NPR – Tamara Keith
NYT - Amy Chozik
Yes NYT - Maggie Haberman
Yes Politico - Annie Karni
Politico - Gabe Debenedetti
Yes Reuters - Amanda Becker
The Hill - Amie Parnes
Yes Washington Post - Anne Gearan
Yes WSJ - Laura Meckler
Yes WSJ - Peter Nicholas
Yes WSJ - Colleen McCain Nelson
*From:* Jesse Ferguson [mailto:jesse@jesseferguson.com]
*Sent:* Monday, April 6, 2015 5:10 PM
*To:* Amanda Renteria; 'Huma Abedin'; 'Marlon Marshall'; 'Robby Mook'; Nick Merrill; Jennifer Palmieri; brianefallon@gmail.com;
Kristina Schake; 'Mandy Grunwald'; 'Margolis, Jim'; 'Joel Benenson'; 'John Podesta'
*Cc:* 'Marissa Astor'
*Subject:* Press Dinners - Full Info
We wanted to make sure everyone on this email had the latest information on
the two upcoming dinners with reporters. Both are off-the-record.
1) Thursday night, April 9th at 7:00p.m. Dinner at the Home of John Podesta. His address is 3743 Brandywine St NW in Washington,
DC. This will be with about 20 reporters who will closely cover the campaign (aka the bus).
2) Friday night, April 10th at 6:30p.m. Cocktails and Hors D'oeuvre at the Home of Joel Benenson. His home address is 60 E. 96th
Street, #12B, New York, 10128. This is with a broader universe of New York reporters.
We understand if it’s too hard to make it, not a big deal, but great if you can.
Let me know if you have any questions. WIKILEAKS:
See...? And this is only the ones selected for this particular narrative.
Imagine the amount of Editors, Sub-Editors, Journalists, celebrity-pundits and News Anchors that
are out there with their own set of ideals!
The ethics and responsibilities that a person takes on when relating valid information without biased
is something that today, equates to projecting a non-gendered human to the moon via a catapult.
Their corrupted and seemingly socially-accepted 'soul' -for want of a better word, won't let them.
You would think the video exposing CNN would be enough to shut the Liberals up, but NO. Over on a board I won't mention, they (the Liberals) are saying this video was edited, and made to look like the producer of CNN was saying things he didn't say.
They are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo brainwashed at this point, I don't think anything short of their Lord Obama coming out and telling the truth would open their eyes.