Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Gotham may go dark soon?
#10
Adding some fall-out to the NYC story...

Quote:Nuclear Watchdog Groups Mock NYC's Atomic Bomb Preparedness Video As 'Delusional'

While New York City Mayor Eric Adams called the PSA a "great idea," some critics accused officials of unwarranted fearmongering amid increased nuclear tensions with Russia over its invasion of Ukraine and NATO's response.

Others lambasted the PSA as latest in a line of nuclear war informationals like the U.S. Civil Defense Administration's Duck and Cover and the British government's Protect and Survive films that offer little more than delusive contentment for millions of people who likely would not survive a full-scale thermonuclear attack.

"The reality is, if this comes to pass, you don't 'got this,'" tweeted the International Campaign to Ban Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), which was awarded the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize for its work leading to a landmark treaty outlawing nukes.

Calling the PSA "outrageously misguided," ICAN said it's difficult to get inside fast during a nuclear explosion "when, in a matter of seconds, houses up to 175 kilometers away from the epicenter crumble like they are made of cards."


This in a city that suffered the 9/11 attacks, which some people to this day maintain were the result of "mini-nukes." The fact of the matter is, that the nuclear weapons of Russia and the USA have now entered the period of "dial-a-yield", and can be made to be quite small. Indeed, nuclear "devices" are so sophisticated now that dial-a-yield is not fiction: one can literally modify the intended yield of a particular device depending on what one wants to accomplish. The trend in nuclear weapons, contrary to the article, is not to larger and larger yields, but the reverse, to smaller and smaller yields   with much more efficient burns, and with commensurately smaller radioactive effects. We've known for a very long time how to design big yields.

If one examines the actual statements of the New York City PSA, they are more condign to the detonation of a low-efficiency low-yield "dirty bomb" than they are of an actual nuclear or thermonuclear detonation. They are more suited to the detonation of a "home-grown" dirty bomb act of terrorism, (Jericho 2006 tv series) than of the nuclear weapons in the arsenals of the world's nuclear powers. In other words, per usual a narrative is being prepared, perhaps for yet another "false flag" conducted by a desperate evil multi-national group. And using the nuke fear (as another social experiment?) is just another political tool that seems they're scraping the bottom of the barrel.

Historically, “drills” sometimes go parallel with “false flags.”

Enjoy the show, we got a long ways to go.

[Image: lkFhVwO.gif]
"The New World fell not to a sword but to a meme." – Daniel Quinn

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that." ― John Lennon

Rogue News says that the US is a reality show posing as an Empire.




Messages In This Thread
Gotham may go dark soon? - by EndtheMadnessNow - 08-01-2022, 12:39 AM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by NightskyeB4Dawn - 08-01-2022, 01:05 AM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by Brotherman - 08-01-2022, 01:37 AM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by Ninurta - 08-01-2022, 02:44 AM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by 727Sky - 08-01-2022, 02:50 AM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by Brotherman - 08-01-2022, 02:51 AM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by NightskyeB4Dawn - 08-01-2022, 03:32 AM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by Brotherman - 08-01-2022, 04:00 AM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by EndtheMadnessNow - 08-01-2022, 10:17 PM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by Ninurta - 08-01-2022, 10:39 PM
RE: Gotham may go dark soon? - by xuenchen - 08-02-2022, 02:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)