Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
US Senator Championing Censorship
#9
(10-30-2020, 06:03 AM)Ninurta Wrote: NightskyeB4Dawn
https://mewe.com/faq
Quote:The Politics of MeWe

Unlike other social networks, at MeWe we have absolutely no political agenda and no one can pay us to target you with theirs. MeWe is for law-abiding and TOS-abiding people everywhere in the world, regardless of political, ethnic, religious, sexual, and other preferences. We have a strict and clear Terms of Service protecting our members: haters, bullies, porn, spammers, bots, lawbreakers, violence inciters, etc. are prohibited.

They don't. That's the beauty of free speech - it's free. If it's not illegal speech, it's good to go.
.

How are they going to prohibit haters, bullies, and the like without censorship?  If they get to decide what is illegal speech or hate speech, then wouldn't they be guilty of censorship? 

I am just asking a question because I am confused by how things are lauded when it comes out of the mouths of one, and vilified when it comes out of the mouth of another.  

How did everything become so polarized that we can't even agree on what is normal or acceptable speech? Is this the foundation for the birth of newspeak?

No excuses for those that have the eyes to see and the ears to hear.

For every one person that read this post. About 7.99 billion have not. 

Yet I still post.  tinyinlove
  • minusculebeercheers 




Messages In This Thread
US Senator Championing Censorship - by ABNARTY - 10-29-2020, 08:53 PM
RE: US Senator Championing Censorship - by beez - 10-30-2020, 12:23 AM
RE: US Senator Championing Censorship - by NightskyeB4Dawn - 10-30-2020, 01:29 PM
RE: US Senator Championing Censorship - by PLOTUS - 10-30-2020, 04:58 PM
RE: US Senator Championing Censorship - by PLOTUS - 10-30-2020, 05:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)