The truth if Roe v Wade is repealed . . . . .

[Ninurta]

. . . . . Abortions will still happen.

This isn't a thread on if you or I are for or against abortion.

I just wanted to post this because the media and many people are misrepresenting this.

With Amy Barrett going to the Supreme Court, many are panicked that she might be the key player in over turning Roe v Wade.

If the Supreme Court does, then abortions will no longer be considered a Constitutional right.  

But it will still be a state right, based upon what the legislature in each individual state decides and votes on.

Just an FYI

Fact.

I recall what it was like in the US before abortion became a "right" nationwide. IF a girl couldn't manage to keep her knees together and just wanted to rid herself of her little nuisance instead of attempting to prevent it in the first place, she had two choices - go to an illegal clinic, or simply go across state lines until she got to one where there was a legal - in that state - clinic.

Even back then in the Dark Ages, there were what were euphemistically called "doctors" who had no qualms about killin' off kids for a price. It would just go back to that, but Marxists now try really hard to convince modern kids that those days never were, and before Roe v, Wade it was utterly impossible to get a legal abortion in America... but that simply isn't the truth. It was a State matter, a state decision.

Granted, it wasn't as convenient for women back then, but it COULD be done, and was regularly, and since when should cold blooded murder be convenient anyhow?

I guess it would be fair to say that my personal take on abortion ALMOST puts me in the "pro choice" camp with one caveat - a father should have as much say in killing his offspring as a mother has in killing off hers. If either says no, then the baby lives and becomes the responsibility of the dissenting parent after it's birth. It seems a no-brainer to me. If the baby ain't mine, then I ain't got no dog in that fight, and no say in the decision whether to wring it's neck or not. Whether they kill it off or not is none of my business.

After all, it takes two to make a baby - and it should take two to end one. Unless it was an Immaculate Conception, then that woman didn't get that way by herself - why should the decision be hers and hers alone then?

If it IS mine, then God help the woman who kills it off and takes away MY choice in the matter. If she don't want the little nuisance, then fine, I'll take care of it and she can get on with her carefree life after it's born. As it stands right now, only females have a choice in the matter, and that is the ultimate in sexism. A Chica has a license to kill MY kid, simply because my plumbing is an outie instead of an innie, and that would not sit very well with me at all, at all.

That is why I cannot place myself fully into the "pro choice" camp - because I am afforded no choice in the matter at all. How can I be pro-choice if I HAVE no choice? I am a second class citizen in this issue simply by the accident of my plumbing at birth... and that is kinda how sexism is defined, isn't it?

I am a victim of sexism promoted by Feminists! 

.