07-21-2016, 02:12 AM
Aah, the Guardian must be pro-global warming.
The other article I posted was from the Guardian, and they put down the guys that said volcanoes put out more CO2 than man.
And now, looking up Wiki for information on DDP and it actually has in there that the Guardian calls it a "fringe political group" due to them being skeptical of man-made GW.
Linky
See, you get called loonie names for questioning GW, when in science as a whole, that is what one would normally do.
Question, study, analyze...question and research some more.
But not with man-made GW, one is not supposed to that.
The other article I posted was from the Guardian, and they put down the guys that said volcanoes put out more CO2 than man.
And now, looking up Wiki for information on DDP and it actually has in there that the Guardian calls it a "fringe political group" due to them being skeptical of man-made GW.
Quote:Doctors for Disaster Preparedness (DDP) is a 501©(3) non-profit organization located in Tucson, Arizona.[1] Its Facebook page states that the group "promotes homeland defense and prudent preparedness for disasters of all kinds".[citation needed] The group is closely affiliated with the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, a politically conservative nonprofit association, with which it shares an address and administrative staff.[2] It is run by Arizona physician Jane Orient.[3]
According to Bloomberg News, the group was "founded to promote civil defense during the Cold War", and has been "transformed over the years into a forum" on "fringe-science topics" such as global warming denial.[3]
DDP was described by The Guardian as a "fringe political group" and as a "truly bizarre lobby group".[citation needed] It promotes the "skeptical" view that man-made global warming is not real or not an important concern.[2] The group awards the Petr Beckmann Award, named in honor of Petr Beckmann, a libertarian electrical engineer who challenged Albert Einstein's theory of relativity. [4]
Linky
See, you get called loonie names for questioning GW, when in science as a whole, that is what one would normally do.
Question, study, analyze...question and research some more.
But not with man-made GW, one is not supposed to that.