Rogue-Nation3
Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - Printable Version

+- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com)
+-- Forum: Controversy and Debate (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-19.html)
+--- Forum: Hot Button Issues (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-21.html)
+--- Thread: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? (/thread-2941.html)



Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - OmegaLogos - 11-06-2017

Explanation: I found this thread on ATS that made the claim that Second Amendment Advocates have Blood on their Hands.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1190079/pg1

It was posted in the ATS political mudpit forum and had an obvious click bait title. [note: I added a question mark to the title to make it a question and not a statement of fact ok.]

As soon as I saw the title I immediately had a vision of the Tree of Liberty Soaked in Blood!

Personal Disclosure: And that is my answer to the question posed.

YES! We all have blood on our hands because the tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of both patriots and tyrants from generation to generation.

There is no escaping that fact if one is a citizen of the USA.

And it is nothing to be ashamed of and here is why ...

The founding fathers all had blood on their hands!

So, having stated that, I ask my fellow members for their comments, opinions and or any questions on this hot topic subject.

Do you agree? If not please detail why!


RE: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - BIAD - 11-06-2017

It's a 'nudger' -thread.
If the Second Amendment can be altered, then other parts of the US Constitution can be
added to, deleted and massaged to assist in a selected agenda.

The people reading that thread haven't killed people in a school, church or concert, but the
writer of that thread wishes that the reader accepts a guilt-by-proxy to achieve his suggestion.

That particular Amendment is nothing to do with gun access, weapons sales or misinformed
perceptions of reality, it's about the citizens of a country having the responsibility to protect
their cultural and leadership structure from enemies within.

With any people on the internet, this convoluted world never existed until the were born!!

(I'm a Brit, so I shouldn't really have commented!)


RE: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - Mystic Wanderer - 11-06-2017

I don't feel the least bit guilty for owning a gun, and I'll use it if anyone decides to come into my home and try to claim what's mine!
I'll also use it if I see a wild animal attacking my outside cats, or if I'm attacked out in public.

As a reporter said last night on Info Wars, that guy that did the shooting in the church had many more guns in his car.  He was probably heading to do more killings, but he was stopped because of a gun owner who stepped in to help. 
Wonder how many lives that man saved by using his gun against the killer? 

Guns don't kill people, people kill people.   The 2nd amendment is just fine.  Leave it alone, or...   smallmachinegun


RE: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - guohua - 11-11-2017

(11-06-2017, 02:38 PM)BIAD Wrote: It's a 'nudger' -thread.
If the Second Amendment can be altered, then other parts of the US Constitution can be
added to, deleted and massaged to assist in a selected agenda.

The people reading that thread haven't killed people in a school, church or concert, but the
writer of that thread wishes that the reader accepts a guilt-by-proxy to achieve his suggestion.

That particular Amendment is nothing to do with gun access, weapons sales or misinformed
perceptions of reality, it's about the citizens of a country having the responsibility to protect
their cultural and leadership structure from enemies within.

With any people on the internet, this convoluted world never existed until the were born!!

(I'm a Brit, so I shouldn't really have commented!)

That's The Best Reply.  minusculeclap
Brit ir not, he's right.


RE: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - OmegaLogos - 06-23-2020

Explanation: Time to dust this subject off and bring it back into the light for further analysis!

Personal Disclosure: Shameless Bump!!! minusculebeercheers


RE: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - guohua - 06-23-2020

@"OmegaLogos" 
You just go ahead and BUMP IT Baby!  smallgreenbananadancer


RE: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - Ninurta - 06-23-2020

It wouldn't do for me to try to deny I have blood on my hands - just about everyone and their brothers know otherwise.

I won't apologize or feel guilty for it, either - some folks just desperately NEED to bleed out! They're a waste of perfectly serviceable skin.

I'm ready to get more on them in an instant - just as soon as those piss-ants who promised to bring their "revolution" out here into the hinterlands find the balls to make good on their threats.

I'll teach those bastards just how a jungle war is fought!

I make no apologies, nor do I ask any pardon for it.

I'd hang a Confederate flag outside so they know just which house to hit, but baiting prey is illegal in this state.

Shooting intruders isn't.

.


RE: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - Wallfire - 06-23-2020

Dont know enough about this so I will just sit this one out, perhaps ask a question or two


RE: Second Amendment Advocates Have Blood on Their Hands? - BIAD - 06-23-2020

Wrong thread... sorry!