The Blue Pill. - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com) +-- Forum: Controversy and Debate (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-19.html) +--- Forum: Off Topic (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-109.html) +--- Thread: The Blue Pill. (/thread-1652.html) |
RE: The Blue Pill. - Mystic Wanderer - 04-17-2017 (04-17-2017, 05:39 PM)BIAD Wrote: As we who resist the dosage of the Blue Pill would say, Phew...! nearly! Quote:Published on Dec 6, 2014 Sounds interesting. On my "must watch" list for later this evening. RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 04-24-2017 My piece below may seem to be catering for the nieve or simple-minded who see the world with a selfish set of values where nuance and negotiation have no place. We use expressions like 'not all...' and 'in my opinion...' because of the need to explain that what we say is a generic view and not written in stone. If an error is made on a fact or a perception is offered where specifics are not accurately displayed, the 'soupçon' mistake is seized upon to argue about and the overall opinion is lost in a mire of 'what you said was...' instead what an opponent of the offered opinion knew really what was meant. It's a symptom of the addiction to the Blue Pill! We live in a world where narrative composition -especially in word-form, goes unnoticed, where unwanted information that must be shown to imply fairness, is placed in the middle of an article so that the impact of a sensational headline is maintained and the real forced suitable message is kept until the end of the story. That way, the reader or viewer forgets the unwanted information and gobbles down the pudding! This is what many of today's social-media and facets of Journalism are hanging onto. In blogging forums, they meander with 'whataboutery' and other tools of persuasion to craft an opinion that hold hidden agendas. All I can say at this point is I do not have an agenda, I am merely an observer. It seems the current vogue of debate is forced in the manner suggested above and I mean no disrespect in the wording here to those who can see beyond what the mainstream media shovel in our direction everyday. I would dare to state that every person on this planet has a point of view based on their belief-structure and how they've wittingly or unwittingly been moulded by the society or environment they exist in. And if that same planet agrees that one individual's views are just as important as another's, then surely a overall common ground can be reached, yes? Detente is always needed and when an accord is reached, it is usual that the minority begrudgingly cede -to some extent, to the majority because commonsense prevails through the logic that a greater-good tends to benefit the greater amount of people. In essence, that's what Rogue Nation was formed for... nobody gets left behind! Usually, the majority gets it's message out via the conduits of the media and the message becomes the agreed backbone of the masses that other beneficial ideas can be attached to. The media are an important part of this communication and the act is symbiotic, the community gets to hear what others are thinking and the media benefits financially by growing it's readership. In these days of the internet and social media, the established 'Fourth Estate' is under increasing pressure of being drowned out. So why is it that when the people of France cry out in one voice that the establlishment that they've believed in for so long is no longer vaiable, the media are reluctant to extrapolate the opinions of someone a majority of the the French voted for? A chosen political party has many strings to it's bow and the leader of group isn't the person who steers it's views, he or she is merely the conduit to the public they're supposed to represent. Again, my writing may seem obvious, but I'm alarmed by how the mainstream media will not dwell on and debate the idea of a genuine discussion of a particular candidate. Marine Le Pen's National Front came second on the first vote and with Emmanuel Macron only claiming around two percent more than the only female in the election, I'm just surprised at the lack of discussion on what many French citizens are obviously desire and are showing by voting for Ms. Le Pen. Her party's views may not be the most 'cosmopolitan' but if we can debate gender-assignment, US President's Trump's tweets and the strife of living in a migrant camp, surely the same public who voted for Marine Le Pen must be confronted with a fair narrative from the media? The BBC states what she wants: ........................................................... *Negotiation with Brussels on a new EU, followed by a referendum *"Automatic" expulsion of illegal immigrants and legal immigration cut to 10,000 per year following an immediate total moratorium *"Extremist" mosques closed and priority to French nationals in social housing *Retirement age fixed at 60 and 35-hour week assured SOURCE: ........................................................... I would suggest that the first and second wishes are the reasons the MSM don't wish to discuss the pros and cons of her party's ambitions, a referendum would certainly disrupt the European Project and would add even more verve for a break-up of this non-elected bureaucratic wast of money. The second request of expulsion can be seen as a demand from the public that bombings, vehicular killings and death by firearms are not wanted alongside what many of the French see as a dilution of their unique culture. So why would the media give a damn about these views...? Why would they 'care' whether a blonde -haired divorcee didn't like the European Union and wanted the economic migrants out of her country? They report the news don't they...? They don't form it! Instead of opening up these opinions, the MSM quickly show the unwanted information and then -not only tarry on the views of the current leader of the election, which is fair in my opinion, but they also fill the columns with viewpoints that the dropped-out losers had too! Should they do this...? I ask myself and resist the urge to believe the MSM are attempting to make me believe (and presumably the French voters too!)...that what they think is the correct way to see this election. Then I succumb to my sarcasm and continue!! Except they do, the mainstream media have fed the masses a narrative that has changed the middle-class young into unwitting political zombies, who perceive a world where kindness is great as long as someone else performs it. Their undeveloped perceptions force them to behave in the same manner as their school days, they don't wish to stand out from the crowd, yet they crave their individuality. The young feel that they are fully equipped to enter adulthood and yet larp and bawl when they don't get their own way. But the world doesn't work like that and I'm ranting. Sorry. The same media has ignored the generations of the working classes in favour of producing fluff pieces of the mundane and moulding a politically-charged incident into a mono-browed opinion that merely caters for a 'now' perspective. To do this, the European Community and the recent years of grey, unregulated abuse of power in the United States are an ideal forum to gambol in and produce a quality of journalism of a quality past-scribes of that trade would baulk at. Religion is a major aspect in the current european situation and it won't matter if you're an athiest or just accept that all ideologies are okay, it seems that many of France's citizens are realising what is just around the corner. The newspapers and television networks daren't approach these respective subjects because they would be entering the world of Le Pen and the people who voted for her, exist in and it seems their media-masters do not want to wander into these adult, disturbing realities. We may not have the 'Thought Police' of Orwell's story, yet... but I'd suggest we already be entertaining the 'Narrative Enforcers'!! RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-01-2017 In the market of enterprise and the world of manipulating the masses to want your product, some things just stay the same. RE: The Blue Pill. - Mystic Wanderer - 05-01-2017 (05-01-2017, 07:12 PM)BIAD Wrote: In the market of enterprise and the world of manipulating the Ordering seems to defeat the message. RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-06-2017 French election: Media warned not to publish hacked Macron emails. 'French officials say it may be illegal to circulate leaked messages from the presidential candidate's campaign. The media has been warned not to publish the contents of hacked emails from Emmanuel Macron's presidential campaign. France's electoral commission has said any organisations that circulate information from the leaked messages may be committing a criminal offence. On Friday, Mr Macron's campaign team confirmed it had fallen victim to a "massive hacking attack" which resulted in hundreds of internal documents being dumped online. About nine gigabytes of data was posted by an anonymous user called EMLEAKS, only hours before the end of official election campaigning...' SOURCE: I suppose that's the thing about age, some of us can remember a time when this sort of Establishment control would have been scoffed at. Whoever the Electoral Commission are, they dont know what is or isn't illegal and in the spirit of today's Blue-Pill dumbing down project, the warning will be heeded by the European media to avoid revealing their agenda of keeping the masses ignorant. Journalists used to search for the truth instead of a grey, soft, middle-class version of a truth. The idea that the pantomime's evil character Le Pen must be maintained whilst Macron the-Prince-of-the-People must always be seen in a golden light. It's ironic that CNN's Chris Cuomo stated: “...Also interesting is remember, it’s illegal to possess, ah, the stolen documents... it’s different for the media. So everything you’re learning about this, you’re learning from us,” SOURCE: The rules of free speech must be different in Europe, huh? RE: The Blue Pill. - guohua - 05-06-2017 BIAD stated "The rules of free speech must be different in Europe, huh?" Only because the N W O has a Stronger Grip there I think. Mr. Macron is their Pick I Think. I mean. he fits their profile I understand. Didn't he say he'd marry his H/s teacher when he was 15 years old and she was in her 40's after they spent time together with her helping him on One on One Sessions. Quote:This is the moment a 15-year-old Emmanuel Macron kissed his 40-year-old teacher - two years before he declared he wanted to marry her.Elites, N W O, What are they? RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-08-2017 With the sudden drop of terrorist-related news being reported, if an obvious incident comes to light at the most famous airport in the UK, it's sometimes best to set out one's account to maintain the illusion that attacks in the first-world societies have subsided and more importantly, travelling from certain countries is not a factor. After all, showing that President Trump was correct with his travel-ban is not what the establishment want to hear. Words such as 'briefly' implies a light, non-urgent incident that many Journalists know will give the reader the false feeling that the assumed strict-control in these facilities apply, are still in place and sometimes overreact to even the most fleeting of worries. If it turns out that a serious, life-threatening activity has occurred and due to the amount of the public involved could put this diluting of the facts in peril of the mainstream media's covering-up agenda, then there's no other way but to report it and keep the scare-tactics down to a minimum. At the forefront of the mainstream media's concern is the establishment's credo must be maintained, so it's best to place the actual facts of an ongoing danger at the end of the report, based on the idea that the reader's attention-span is short and they won't get that far. Another clue a to how the established media perceive their dumbed-down, decreasing readership. Heathrow briefly suspends flights after suspicious item found. 'Flights at Heathrow airport were briefly suspended after a suspicious item was detected by an x-ray of luggage at Terminal 3. Metropolitan police were still working with airport authorities after the discovery at about 8am on Friday triggered a security alert. As flights resumed, passengers complained on Twitter about the subsequent delays and long queues. A Met spokeswoman said officers were working with the airport authorities and inquiries were ongoing. A spokesman for Heathrow said: “Departures were suspended for a short time from Terminal 3 due to a security issue. We are very sorry to any passengers whose journeys are affected. The safety and security of our passengers and colleagues is paramount.” The security alert comes the day after a man arriving at Heathrow on a flight from Turkey was arrested on suspicion of terrorism-related crime. There is no suggestion the arrest and security alert are related. The man, 30, was detained by the Met’s counter-terror squad as he stepped off a plane from Istanbul on Thursday evening. A Scotland Yard spokesman said the man had been arrested on suspicion of preparing for terrorist acts and terrorist training. He remains in custody at a south London police station while officers search a property in the east of the capital...' SOURCE: Isn't it good to know the conduit between what is happening in the world and those who want to know the facts, have your best interests at heart?! RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-08-2017 (05-06-2017, 05:21 PM)guohua Wrote: BIAD stated "The rules of free speech must be different in Europe, huh?" Oh indeed for both comments! There are private forums where Journalists discuss tactics on how to deliver packaged news and approved narratives. Many viewers/readers assume that if one news-outlet carries a story, then the rest just follow suit, but think about how this comes about. Before the internet and the capability of 'trending', this mono-society, altogether-news reporting behavior went on and now with the last twenty years of Amway-like, brainwashed educating of the young, it's easy to convince most of the 'European' public with words that they want to hear. It 'feels' safe to be part of something you believe has your best interests and say the things you want to hear... but think about what a Policeman in the UK looked like back then to what they look like now. 1977 1989 Today. Is this just because of technology?! If I may, I'll respond to the Macron situation in another post. RE: The Blue Pill. - 727Sky - 05-09-2017 Quote:R! THE HORROR!https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/04/30/the-horror-the-horror/ RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-09-2017 Anyone remember the days when your enemy was never allowed to invade or even enter your country? I must be missing the point because the articles below are just beyond my level of rationality and I wonder at times if I'm the only one who gets how this has been caused by stupidity. Manhunt in Paris following Gare du Nord evacuation. 'The station was evacuated after a tip-off that a would-be attacker was arriving on a high-speed train. French police are hunting three men suspected of planning an Islamic State militant attack. The search follows a large-scale investigation at the Gare du Nord, one of the main railway stations in Paris, on Monday night, when a high-speed train was evacuated and the station temporarily closed. The evacuation took place after a tip-off from a ticket vendor in Valenciennes, near the Belgian border, who thought they recognised a man they had seen on a police wanted notice. Between 20 and 30 police vans were sent to the station with officers wearing balaclavas and carrying assault weapons. Passengers were taken to a nearby brasserie where they were searched, but the alert was called off after nothing was found. A police spokesman said: "Unfortunately it was determined that the person was not in the train"...' SOURCE: Aine Davis guilty of being senior Islamic State member. 'A British man suspected of being part of an Islamic State group that beheaded hostages has been convicted of a terrorism offence in Turkey. Aine Davis, 33, of London, had been arrested in 2015 near Istanbul. He was found guilty of being a senior member of a terrorist organisation and jailed for seven-and-a-half years. The BBC understands Davis was one of a four-man IS cell nicknamed "The Beatles", which included the person dubbed Jihadi John. Davis, the only one of the group to face a trial, had denied the charges against him. One of the group's former captives welcomed the conviction by a Turkish judge at the court in at Silivri. Spanish journalist Javier Espinosa, who was subjected to mock executions, told BBC News it did not matter where Davis was tried. "He should face justice wherever it is. It doesn't matter if it's in England or Turkey or wherever. He should be in jail forever."..' SOURCE: F*ckin' British...!? Are you kidding me?! Meanwhile, in Italy... Italy seizes huge drugs haul intended for Isil fighters in Libya . 'Italian authorities seized a huge quantity of drugs that were allegedly destined for Islamic State fighters in Libya, who use them to dull pain and suppress fatigue. The shipment, which was intercepted in Genoa, consisted of 37 million tablets of Tramadol, a pain-killer reportedly used by ISIL terrorists to increase their battlefield resilience. Italian police believe that ISIL leaders planned to sell the packets of pain-killers to their foot soldiers in Libya for the equivalent of two euros each, which would have netted them 74 million euros. The drugs would also have been sold to people in the street in Libya and Egypt, where dependence on Tramadol has become a serious social problem. The drugs were found in three containers that were in transit through Genoa. The packets of pills were concealed amid bottles of shampoo and other hygiene products. The containers had come from India and were destined for the ports of Misurata and Tobruk in Libya. Italian police and customs officials worked with agents from the Drug Enforcement Administration from the US. “Tramadol is a synthetic opioid, normally used for pain relief, that is also used as a narcotic, especially in the Middle East,” Italian border police said in a statement. “The sale of the seized drugs would have earned around 75 million euros, given that each packet would have been sold for around two euros on the black market in North Africa and the Middle East,” the police said. “The profits would have gone towards funding Islamic terrorism.”...' SOURCE: RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-14-2017 Post-truth politics... Art of the lie. 'Politicians have always lied. Does it matter if they leave the truth behind entirely? Consider how far Donald Trump is estranged from fact. He inhabits a fantastical realm where Barack Obama’s birth certificate was faked, the president founded Islamic State (IS), the Clintons are killers and the father of a rival was with Lee Harvey Oswald before he shot John F. Kennedy. Mr Trump is the leading exponent of “post-truth” politics—a reliance on assertions that “feel true” but have no basis in fact. His brazenness is not punished, but taken as evidence of his willingness to stand up to elite power. And he is not alone. Members of Poland’s government assert that a previous president, who died in a plane crash, was assassinated by Russia. Turkish politicians claim the perpetrators of the recent bungled coup were acting on orders issued by the CIA. The successful campaign for Britain to leave the European Union warned of the hordes of immigrants that would result from Turkey’s imminent accession to the union. If, like this newspaper, you believe that politics should be based on evidence, this is worrying. Strong democracies can draw on inbuilt defences against post-truth. Authoritarian countries are more vulnerable. That politicians sometimes peddle lies is not news: think of Ronald Reagan’s fib that his administration had not traded weapons with Iran in order to secure the release of hostages and to fund the efforts of rebels in Nicaragua. Dictators and democrats seeking to deflect blame for their own incompetence have always manipulated the truth; sore losers have always accused the other lot of lying. But post-truth politics is more than just an invention of whingeing elites who have been outflanked. The term picks out the heart of what is new: that truth is not falsified, or contested, but of secondary importance. Once, the purpose of political lying was to create a false view of the world. The lies of men like Mr Trump do not work like that. They are not intended to convince the elites, whom their target voters neither trust nor like, but to reinforce prejudices...' The Economist: Forgive them Father... because they're middle-class, smug, establishment-biased hacks and they know what they do. Hillary only did wrong because she was caught- The Establishment's Credo. If it was that the majority of the people that voted for Trump were red-necked, conspiracy-craving, racist, pillow-case-wearing dullards, then... A: Why is it that only now, you deem them negative? B: Why have the mainstream ever considered approaching this group of people to offer your alternative view? C: Why is the same mainstream media's readership in the tank and failing with it's agreed narrative? RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-15-2017 Assuming this report is actually true, here's an example of the Blue Pill media in action. If the anomaly of this report is the suggestion that the culprit in this story has actually acquired a human head to brandish after an alleged killing of a female in a house and a stabbing of a male employee of the Harvest Market Thriftway store, then where did he get it from? Information around the incident is still vague, but one would assume that the severed head would belong to the at-home victim and that, would imply a ritualistic death. In today's environment, that would smack of the same style of execution reported about in countries that hold a certain type of ideology. But this is cosmopolitan USA... and we can't have the citizens thinking that such religious zealots running around and dealing out their particular kind of extreme faith, can we?! Man 'covered in blood and holding human head stabs store worker' in Oregon. 'A man is reportedly in custody after walking into a US supermarket covered in blood, holding a knife and what looked like a human head, and stabbing a worker. Police responded to a call about the attack at the Harvest Market Thriftway in Estacada, Oregon, at around 2.15pm on Sunday. Other staff reportedly held the knifeman down until police arrived. The store worker was airlifted to Emanuel Hospital for treatment...' SOURCE: Deputies: Stabbing suspect was carrying ‘human head’ 'Estacada stabbing connected to death investigation in Colton, deputies said. ESTACADA, Ore. (KOIN) — A man who allegedly stabbed a person inside an Estacada grocery store Sunday is believed to be connected to the death of a woman in Colton, according to Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office. A 911 caller told deputies the man walked into Harvest Market Thriftway on S Broadway around 2:15 p.m. He was reportedly “covered in blood” and holding “a knife and what looked like a human head.” The man stabbed a store employee who was flown to Emanuel Legacy Medical Center with critical injuries. Other workers reportedly held the suspect down until authorities arrived and took him into custody. “We saw panicking people rushing for their vehicles, vehicles trying to get out all at one time,” witness Kristin Courtain told KOIN 6 News. The suspect’s car was still running with its windshield wipers on long after his arrest. Just 15 minutes after the attack, another person called 911 to report finding a woman who appeared to be dead inside a home on the 25000 block of Elwood Drive in Colton. Multiple agencies responded and found a woman dead on the scene. Deputies say both incidents are connected and there is no threat to the public...' SOURCE: RE: The Blue Pill. - Mystic Wanderer - 05-15-2017 Here is an interesting video: Proof CNN Is a Military Psyop. In 1983 50% of media was owned by 50 companies, but in 2011 that number rose to the media being owned by only 6 companies, which shows how our media has been infiltrated by the "shadow government". It appears Operation Mockingbird has been very successful since it's beginning in the 1950s.
Quote:Operation Mockingbird was allegedly a large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that, beginning in the early 1950s, attempted to manipulate news media for propaganda purposes. It funded student and cultural organizations and magazines as front organizations. Anderson Cooper https://youtu.be/kwMCIe2AGW8 What I've posted so far should give anyone out there reason to doubt what CNN has to say, or any MSM for that matter. Do your own research to learn the truth. RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-17-2017 There are those who see the regular Reporters that swarm around the White House as the bastions of honourable information and hold no bias towards any particular party. Then there some who perceive the established news outlets as mere milling seagulls that have chose a particular narrative and follow any tid-bit whether it's valid or not. Whichever colour of pill one decides to swallow, I think both sides can agree the writer of this below would fall under the heading 'Shower of Sh*t' anyway. I found it as a 'Top Story' when I googled 'latest news' and seeing the headline and not checking the source, I clicked on it to read about the further escapade that's supposedly unfolding in the environs of Washington D.C. Chaos on Capitol Hill as Republicans reel from latest Trump controversy. 'Another day, another bombshell from the president – and a frenzy on the Hill, where Republicans have become used to a barrage of questions from reporters...' The Guardian: Surely, the juicy truth was awaiting just down the page somewhere and I began to read something that wasn't so much a news report, but a story written in a manner that forced a mediocre of false excitement because in reality, nothing happened. The tale tells of Congressmen and Senators moving from one area of Capitol Hill to another... It implies a scandal that is never defined with facts and rolls in a mire of insinuation prose and action -failing suggestion. And these are the people entrusted with relating true information. The end of the penned poppycock is this and for those with a weak heart, beware. '...The contingent of reporters pressing phones and recorders in front of lawmakers has swelled with each controversy, leaving the Senate staff charged with keeping lanes to the elevators clear completely exasperated. On Wednesday, the Senate press gallery sent an email on “Senate Hallway congestion” urging reporters to be “mindful of space constraints and safety concerns”. The letter warned reporters that “Senate officials may act to correct overcrowding situations”, adding: “Collectively, the press following the Senators have become large and aggressive ... we are concerned someone may get hurt.”...' Staggering, nuh? RE: The Blue Pill. - Mystic Wanderer - 05-18-2017 A picture is worth a 1000 words!
RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-18-2017 (05-18-2017, 03:32 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Ahahahaaaa... I checked the image that you kindly offered with Snopes and sadly... their poor freakin' attempt to declaw the intention of The Wall Street Journal fails terribly in my opinion. Below is from Snopes: WHAT'S TRUE An image showing two editions of the same day's Wall Street Journal with opposing headlines about Donald Trump's immigration stance is real. That'll do me Snopes, thanks very much. Next please! WHAT'S FALSE The Wall Street Journal did not publish different headlines in different markets in order to sway voters away from Trump. Hmmm. You're saying that it's false that they did not -ergo TRUE that The Wall Street Journal DID publish different headlines in different markets in order to sway. Okey-dokey... it's bears out your true claim! ORIGIN On 1 September 2016, a photograph purportedly showing two editions of The Wall Street Journal with markedly different front page headlines regarding Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s stance on immigration was circulated on social media: This image was passed around on the Internet accompanied by the claim that the Wall Street Journal had deliberately published one headline, “Trump Softens His Tone,” in a pro-Trump market area in an attempt to sway readers away from the the GOP nominee, and the other headline, “Trump Talks Tough on Wall,” in a non-Trump market area to bolster support for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. However, these opposing headline editions were not distributed to different political or geographic markets, nor were they intended to influence voters. This picture shows two editions of the Wall Street Journal published at different times of the day. The paper on the left came off the press early in the day, while the paper on the right was produced late in the day. Print newspapers sometimes undergo revisions throughout their daily runs and typically employ marks to distinguish the various editions — in this case the differing WSJ editions are distinguishable by the number of stars displayed in the masthead: Colleen Schwartz, the Vice President of Communications at The Wall Street Journal, confirmed that these editions were printed at different times, not in different markets. The edition on the left was published after Trump met with Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto early in the day (and referenced the seemingly cooperative tone of their discussion), and the edition on the right was published after Trump delivered a speech on immigration later in the day (and referenced Trump’s reasserting his stance that he would force Mexico to pay for the building of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border): Yes, the images represent two different editions, published at different times, and the headlines represent the news at the time of publication — before and after his speech. SNOPES: ....................................... Bullshit. Sure, it's a mature explanation that a piece was written because of information known at that time of the day and yeah, it's possible that after secondary information arrived later in that day, an alternate opinion could be preferred. But The Wall Street Journal PRINTED the first paper and I know the logistics involved from a Journalist accepting a certain narrative, arranging the article, having it sub-edited for fine-tuning, processed through the system to be on an actual printing plate and then printed. The freshly-created newspaper is then taken from it's printed location and delivered. And all of that costs money! Money that isn't frittered away in Journalists musings and selective views. A newspaper needs to show a steady trustworthy manner of delivering information and no Editor worth their salt would allow such a shoddy costly flip-flop action without explaining it to the reader. Many people forget that this isn't a single newspaper, thousands are printed off and the time involved just isn't available from the moment a story evolves up to when a newspaper is purchased by a customer. This isn't something that can be casually manipulated during one day. A website page...? easy, but a newspaper is real and you can't delete it! Journalists are not the only people involved in making a newspaper regardless of what Clark Kent and Lois Lane want you to think. The deliberation of typing an article in an office is a long way from being an actual real physical object and even if we discount the time it takes to produce a single story -never mind all the other articles, adverts, and interior parts that all fluid due to many variables, the excuse that Colleen Schwartz offers holds no water. It's bullshit because of what the alternative would prove and this whole piece shows where Snopes' loyalties lie. RE: The Blue Pill. - Mystic Wanderer - 05-18-2017 @"BIAD". Yeah, that's what I meant to say too. RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-18-2017 (05-18-2017, 05:31 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: @"BIAD". I'm not as eloquent as you though! :smallwink: Here's another appetizer to keep the frequencies clear! RE: The Blue Pill. - guohua - 05-18-2017 Watch CNN Host Blow It! Quote:CNN and good decisions do not mix. Much like leftists and good cholesterol. Their accuracy and decision making is especially sub par when it comes to all things Trump and Russia. See Donald Trump Body Slams BuzzFeed, CNN for Fake Russian ‘Report’… and BUSTED! Georgia Court Rules CNN Guilty of Publishing Fake News. Given this track record, not everyone is taking CNN’s word for it when claiming to have solid sources within the Trump-Russia fiasco. One such objector is former U.S. Navy SEAL, Carl Higbie. During a panel discussion, Higbie questioned the credibility of CNN’s sources. RE: The Blue Pill. - BIAD - 05-18-2017 (05-18-2017, 09:00 PM)guohua Wrote: Watch CNN Host Blow It!Yes and one of the things that always bothered me was if their ratings are as poor as some say, then how do they make their money? Then I found this. |