Obama Fires A Climate Change Doubter! - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com) +-- Forum: Controversy and Debate (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-19.html) +--- Forum: The Great Climate Change Debate (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-106.html) +--- Thread: Obama Fires A Climate Change Doubter! (/thread-1422.html) |
Obama Fires A Climate Change Doubter! - BIAD - 12-24-2016 Energy Dept. Defends Obama’s Climate Action Plan By Firing Honest Scientist. 'Department of Energy (DOE) officials withheld information from Congress to advance President Barack Obama’s Climate Action Plan and fired an employee who honestly and thoroughly answered legislative staff’s questions, a congressional committee investigation found. DOE officials, including Noelle Metting, met with staff from the House Science, Space and Technology and Senate Energy and Natural Resources committees in October 2014 to discuss pending legislation the agency opposed. DOE wanted to suppress information to kill support for the bill, science committee Republicans revealed in a report Tuesday. Metting was later fired because she “refused to conform to [DOE management’s] predetermined remarks” and provided “candid and complete information” in response to the committees’ questions, the report said...' SOURCE: RE: Obama Fires A Climate Change Doubter! - guohua - 12-24-2016 Thankfully SOON, This Supposedly, Honest and Transparent Administration of Thugs and Crooks well be All Fired Soon! RE: Obama Fires A Climate Change Doubter! - guohua - 02-04-2017 Obama is GONE and a New Sheriff is in Charge! Now the Faked Data cam be Exposed! Quote:NASA / NOAA Climate Data Is Fake Data Quote:The map above is fake. NOAA almost no temperature data from Africa, and none from central Africa. They simply made up the record temperatures. Quote:Gavin Schmidt at NASA claims the imaginary NOAA data has been replicated by many other institutions. Quote:However, when Gavin is confronted about his obviously bogus temperature graphs, he defends by saying “it is not my data, I get from NOAA.” In fact, all of the supposedly independent agencies get the lion’s share of their data from NOAA. Quote:NASA and NOAA are engaged in the biggest fraud in science history, and this needs to end now that criminals are no longer in control of our government. Under the Trump administration, government employees stand to make huge amounts of money by whistleblowing fraud. Contact Kent Clizbe for details.Source Climate Change Supporters, Your Free Meal Ticket Is OVER! Real Change is Coming! Yes in other world, Find A New Job! RE: Obama Fires A Climate Change Doubter! - guohua - 02-06-2017 The Truth is out There! More Evidence has been released, Yes Climate Change Is A SCAM! Quote:Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming dataIf you're interested, read the rest of this article here: Source RE: Obama Fires A Climate Change Doubter! - BIAD - 02-06-2017 (02-06-2017, 01:45 PM)guohua Wrote: The Truth is out There!The way I see it, Guohua, is that if there was anything to climate change, then we as a species would have stopped doing it twenty years-ago. Just stopped making it happen. There's no need for nuances or careful wordings, there's no need to look at the impact to the economies of countries, you just stop making it happen. If there's a problem with releasing carbon and it's supposed to be a bad thing for the planet and those existing on it, a sane and mature individual, a group or to put it properly, that same whole planet would just stop doing it. It wouldn't be a case of decreasing the output, it wouldn't be a case of creating a market where one's carbon amount could be sold or exchanged, the potential to expose carbon into the atmosphere wouldn't alter just because you've sold your 'calculated' dangerous amount! Forming groups and discussing how to approach the situation -a tactic that has been going on for at least fifteen years that I know of, hasn't stopped all of the industries in all the countries from doing it. Wars cause many of incidents of carbon exposure, yet it's deemed that deliberately poisoning the planet in this method is far-more important than the demand not to do it. People are nursed into believing that they need many of the products that are for sale in the world market and it's perceived that those who own conglomerates, have monopolies on certain markets and are influential in global political circles, are the same ones who have major concerns regarding this dangerous pollution. Yet they haven't stopped making the products and their assumed concerns haven't forced them to. If the rational question is 'if you're to ensure the next generations had a habitable planet to live on, would you go with having no job, no money, no food, no utilities, vehicle or basically go without access to everything you're accustomed to? Then seriously, why haven't we been asked it...? and I'll take a guess that the answer to why we haven't been confronted with this supposed stark reality and why this whole climate change subject has arisen, is the same on both accounts. Money. So it goes under the heading 'Bullshit' Edit: Put it this way, if a guy selling double-glazing tells you it's better to have your house double-glazed for a multitude of viable reasons, it's not because HE wants to feel better living in your house and it's not because he's worried about you. It's about a sale. |