Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In Colorado, They're Counting Gun Shot Fatalities as COVID Deaths
#1
This is not the first report of inflated numbers for COVID deaths as anyone who has been looking can clearly see IMO. Trump, Ben Carson, and Rudy Giuliani all seem to still be alive and there is not a young spring chicken among the bunch . Also where are all the Flu deaths people see every year throughout the world ? Anyway believe what you will but I do think there is something rotten in the whole way the numbers are tallied. Yep COVID equals government money for the hospitals but there has to be more to the grand plan, me thinks...


Quote:A coroner in Colorado is sounding the alarm over how deaths in her county are being counted and attributed to Wuhan coronavirus.
"The coroner, Brenda Bock, says two of their five deaths related to COVID-19 were people who died of gunshot wounds," CBS News Denver reports. "Bock says because they tested positive for COVID-19 within the past 30 days, they were classified as 'deaths among cases.'"
Bock is calling the classification "absurd" and raises concerns death classifications are falsely driving the narrative about the direction of the pandemic. Health officials in the state say they're simply following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control on how to classify deaths of individuals from and with the virus.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavli...s-n2581730
#2
(12-19-2020, 11:45 AM)727Sky Wrote: This is not the first report of inflated numbers for COVID deaths as anyone who has been looking can clearly see IMO. Trump, Ben Carson, and Rudy Giuliani all seem to still be alive and there is not a young spring chicken among the bunch . Also where are all the Flu deaths people see every year throughout the world ? Anyway believe what you will but I do think there is something rotten in the whole way the numbers are tallied. Yep COVID equals government money for the hospitals but there has to be more to the grand plan, me thinks...


Quote:A coroner in Colorado is sounding the alarm over how deaths in her county are being counted and attributed to Wuhan coronavirus.
"The coroner, Brenda Bock, says two of their five deaths related to COVID-19 were people who died of gunshot wounds," CBS News Denver reports. "Bock says because they tested positive for COVID-19 within the past 30 days, they were classified as 'deaths among cases.'"
Bock is calling the classification "absurd" and raises concerns death classifications are falsely driving the narrative about the direction of the pandemic. Health officials in the state say they're simply following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control on how to classify deaths of individuals from and with the virus.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavli...s-n2581730
I seem to remember that in England a man fell of a ladder and his death was listed as COVID19. Got to keep the fear going some how
#3
In the UK they have "tweaked" the wording (definition?) of which deaths are actually being counted as COVID deaths a few times now.

The latest version in Scotland reads something like:

"Death from any cause, in a person who was tested positive for COVID19 in the previous 28 days".

As I have mentioned previously... there have definitely been MORE DEATHS this year when compared with the average number of deaths from the previous 5 years (I checked), but with definitions of "COVID related deaths" like this being used... it looks like there is a definite agenda to artificially inflate those COVID-related numbers.

To what ends?
More Fear?
More Control?
Bigger uptake of Vaccines?


Can anyone think of a positive (good) reason (for us) why they'd artificially inflate the numbers??
Does anyone think that they are not inflating the numbers?
G
[Image: CoolForCatzSig.png]
#4
(12-19-2020, 12:24 PM)gordi Wrote: In the UK they have "tweaked" the wording (definition?) of which deaths are actually being counted as COVID deaths a few times now.

The latest version in Scotland reads something like:

"Death from any cause, in a person who was tested positive for COVID19 in the previous 28 days".

As I have mentioned previously... there have definitely been MORE DEATHS this year when compared with the average number of deaths from the previous 5 years (I checked), but with definitions of "COVID related deaths" like this being used... it looks like there is a definite agenda to artificially inflate those COVID-related numbers.

To what ends?
More Fear?
More Control?
Bigger uptake of Vaccines?


Can anyone think of a positive (good) reason (for us) why they'd artificially inflate the numbers??
Does anyone think that they are not inflating the numbers?
G
First, its good to see you again highlander, its all just seems to be fear porn, but why are  the worlds governments so set on having us living in fear
#5
(12-19-2020, 12:24 PM)gordi Wrote: In the UK they have "tweaked" the wording (definition?) of which deaths are actually being counted as COVID deaths a few times now.

The latest version in Scotland reads something like:

"Death from any cause, in a person who was tested positive for COVID19 in the previous 28 days".

This under-heading is always shown on the BBC and usually said by the broadcaster's Presenter.
However, the late-night news programmes tend to not speak the words and in there, lies the clue to
Gordi's question -in my opinion.

Quote:Can anyone think of a positive (good) reason (for us) why they'd artificially inflate the numbers??
Does anyone think that they are not inflating the numbers?

It keeps the media in a job and even though this may initially sound silly, it is a very important factor.
The numbers are inflated by aligning other ailments due to the simple fact that SARS II (Covid-19) is
a disease that is a contributing component to suffering and possible death.
Although, there are a few accounts of death directly caused by Covid-19.

I'm tempted to suggest the idea of some type of 'NWO control-experiment', but I think that the constant
berating from the media of those who have doubts about this flu is indicative of an agreed narrative.

This could be countered with the idea that Covid is as deadly as they say and the MSM are merely reacting
honestly to the global problem, but the lack of appreciating concerns from 'the other-side' of those who
doubt the merit of this pandemic, tells me it's a bone that the major news-outlets are unwilling to let go of.

2020 -a worldwide killer disease, an election that changes a controversial person from a worldwide power
position, an official military system announced an off-world species are here on Earth and have technologies
that we cannot combat and the revelation of illegal sexual activities seem to be prominent in the realms of
the wealthy and powerful.

Are there enough months in 2020?!!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#6
(12-19-2020, 12:44 PM)Wallfire Wrote: First, its good to see you again highlander,
its all just seems to be fear porn, but why are  the worlds governments so set on having us living in fear

Boy In A Dress and I condone this reply.

tinybiggrin minusculethumbsup
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#7
(12-19-2020, 12:24 PM)gordi Wrote: In the UK they have "tweaked" the wording (definition?) of which deaths are actually being counted as COVID deaths a few times now.

The latest version in Scotland reads something like:

"Death from any cause, in a person who was tested positive for COVID19 in the previous 28 days".

As I have mentioned previously... there have definitely been MORE DEATHS this year when compared with the average number of deaths from the previous 5 years (I checked), but with definitions of "COVID related deaths" like this being used... it looks like there is a definite agenda to artificially inflate those COVID-related numbers.

To what ends?
More Fear?
More Control?
Bigger uptake of Vaccines?


Can anyone think of a positive (good) reason (for us) why they'd artificially inflate the numbers??
Does anyone think that they are not inflating the numbers?
G

I don't have the answers to your questions. I wish I did. 

I don't believe the truth will be a win for us.

The fact that multiple governments were part of equation, used to puzzle me, until I realized that the money is what is the issue here,  and when it comes to money, borders aren't the great divide.

For every one person that read this post. About 7.99 billion have not. 

Yet I still post.  tinyinlove
  • minusculebeercheers 


#8
They need all the fear porn they can get so people will run to get the vaccine. Gates and the "elite" have an agenda:

Depopulation.

I've heard medical scientists say that the vaccine will sterilize women up to 3 generations. (Will future humans be developed in test tubes? I'm sure Gates would love that!)
The virus didn't kill as many as they hoped, so now they have another route to take and the pharmaceutical companies make money too. A double win for them.
#9
(12-19-2020, 12:44 PM)Wallfire Wrote:
(12-19-2020, 12:24 PM)gordi Wrote: In the UK they have "tweaked" the wording (definition?) of which deaths are actually being counted as COVID deaths a few times now.

The latest version in Scotland reads something like:

"Death from any cause, in a person who was tested positive for COVID19 in the previous 28 days".

As I have mentioned previously... there have definitely been MORE DEATHS this year when compared with the average number of deaths from the previous 5 years (I checked), but with definitions of "COVID related deaths" like this being used... it looks like there is a definite agenda to artificially inflate those COVID-related numbers.

To what ends?
More Fear?
More Control?
Bigger uptake of Vaccines?


Can anyone think of a positive (good) reason (for us) why they'd artificially inflate the numbers??
Does anyone think that they are not inflating the numbers?
G
First, its good to see you again highlander, its all just seems to be fear porn, but why are  the worlds governments so set on having us living in fear

Because fearful sheep are easier to control. That is why herd dogs nip at their heels to turn a herd.

.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.

Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’


#10
It must be those special COVID bullets.

And those special COVID traffic fatalities. 

And the those special COVID falling from great heights fatalities.

And those....


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)