Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The great chocolate conspiracy
#1
You know that feeling when you ate something you used to have as a kid, and you think "I'm sure they were bigger when I was a small kid", well yeah - about that ....

You get less confectionery and pay the same, and the common ploys they use. No doubt they will say it is for our health and benefit as they are concerned about obesity levels rising.  Well then add a massive tax to sweets and chocolates as they do with cigarettes and make a shedload more money.

And the callousness of the guy at the end of the article - quoted here. 

So bottom line is just suck it up, you will get used to it, so stop whining.

Quote:But shoppers will get over it. Over time we do tend to get used to the new sizes and move on says Oliver Nieburg, editor of Confectionery News. However angry consumers seem now, he thinks it's unlikely to do lasting damage.

"These are things that are largely forgiven and forgotten after a few months. There's an outcry on social media and then it goes away."

At least Mondelez were transparent about what they were doing. More often these changes happen surreptitiously, he says.

"There may be some initial backlash and a drop in sales, but consumers are likely to adjust to the new reality."

"I wouldn't imagine it would be a lasting problem. "


Quote:Toblerone's trim: Is this the thin end of the wedge?

Here's the good news. There's no need to plan your January diet this year.

The food brands are doing it for you. They're selling you a slimmed down version of their product for the same price.

So while the checkout till rings up the same total as usual, your shopping bag may well be considerably lighter because manufacturers are shaving costs by giving us slightly less chocolate, or fish or ice cream, in what looks like the usual packet.

It's known as "shrinkflation". If the portion size is getting stingier - shrinking - but the price stays the same, then you're effectively paying more - inflation.

For instance, as you'll no doubt have heard, the Toblerone is being redesigned for the UK market; its Alpine peaks are being eroded to compensate for the rising cost of ingredients, and a lighter bar is being sold for the same price.

The 400g bar is now a 360g bar and instead of 15 peaks it boasts only 11. This has caused much gnashing of teeth (and not in a good way).

But - and here's the bad news - there could be more of it to come.

According to the consumer organisation Which? several brands were guilty of this "sneaky way of increasing prices" last year. Tropicana reduced the size of its Orange and Raspberry juice by 15%, packets of McVitie's Digestive dark chocolate biscuits lost around 10% in weight, and Princes is putting less mackerel in each of its tins.

But thanks to the pound's recent weakness and higher costs of ingredients, manufacturers may be tempted to go further.

"I think it's going to happen even more," says Ratula Chakraborty, retail specialist at the University of East Anglia.

"Manufacturers want to keep their prices low, and inflation is happening, commodity prices are changing, so who is going to pay for it? It will be you and I who pay for it."

She thinks we should keep an eye on products across the board in coming months.

"I would say we should be watching out everywhere, food products, fresh produce, household products, grocery products."
Blame Brexit?

Toblerone's owner Mondelez says it is cost pressures that are behind the change.

Cocoa in particular has risen sharply in price over the last decade. And the weaker pound since the UK's vote to leave the EU means it's even more expensive to pay for those kinds of raw ingredients on the world market.

But Jack Skelly, senior analyst at the market intelligence company Euromonitor thinks shrinkflation would be happening with or without the referendum vote.

"Brexit is not the main issue here," he says. "It'll be mostly cocoa that's driving it."

That means, says Mr Skelly, we should watch the size and price of chocolate ice cream, chocolate biscuits and other cocoa content products in the coming months. The cost of palm oil - also found in many chocolate bars, cakes and biscuits, though not in Toblerones - has also risen.

Mondelez says it is not sterling weakness or the Brexit vote that's behind the change, but they are only introducing the new design in the UK.
Sticky prices

As the more optimistic chocoholic might hasten to point out, the price of cocoa has fallen slightly in recent months, giving rise to the hope that portions could become more generous again soon.

Jack Skelly thinks not. "I think cocoa prices will go down next year but there's no way [chocolate] prices will be reduced."

That's just the way it works, prices don't immediately rise every time cocoa gets dearer, but once higher they're likely to "stick" around the new level.
Honey, I shrunk the treats

Which guilty indulgences are weighing less?

    In 2012 Nestle reduced the size of its 1kg tin of Quality Street to 820g
    Cadbury's Dairy Milk bars took on a new curvier, but lighter, shape in 2012
    Cadbury's Creme Eggs went from half a dozen in a box to just five
    The Mars Bar shrank from 58g to 51g and the Snickers from 58g to 48g in 2013

Source: Confectionery News


Toblerone's trim: Is this the thin end of the wedge? - BBC News
#2
Jail the theiving bastards for ripping everyone off ..... followed by public executions .....
Better to reign in hell ....
  than serve in heaven .....



#3
(11-10-2016, 02:23 AM)Daitengu Wrote: Jail the theiving bastards for ripping everyone off ..... followed by public executions .....

Oh I agree. This is a disgrace. Where do these bastards get off on short-changing us in the
name of health concerns?!

I for one will not be renewing my subscription of Confectionery News.
tinyok

But I may have a Twinkie.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#4
(11-10-2016, 12:20 PM)BIAD Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 02:23 AM)Daitengu Wrote: Jail the theiving bastards for ripping everyone off ..... followed by public executions .....

Oh I agree. This is a disgrace. Where do these bastards get off on short-changing us in the
name of health concerns?!

I for one will not be renewing my subscription of Confectionery News.
tinyok

But I may have a Twinkie.


If you read the article though it has nothing to do with health concerns and everything to do with inflation. Prices are going up drastically and they have a choice, raise the prices or decrease the amount your buying and charge the same price. 

Went shopping last week, now admittedly it's been a while since I have purchased canned fruit as it's been summer and so fresh is the way to go. But last time I purchased a can a pears it was 98¢  for a can.. this time, I paid $1.46.. that's a 50% increase in just a few months. But, the size of the can is exactly the same. 

Now, compare that to a can of chili.. I buy canned soup and chili to have on hand for Ninurta's lunches, especially for days I can't easily plan a hot lunch for him due to not being certain when he will take his lunch .. so I keep some quick things on hand.. the price of canned chili has increased over the past year or two so at one point, instead of increasing the price again per can, they cut the size of the can in half on the brand I was getting for him.. so now, in order to serve a whole bowl of chili, instead of buying one can, I have to buy two cans if I want that brand.. as one can now only half fills a bowl.. 

But.. this is because of price increases.. not because they care how much chili my husband eats..they had a choice to keep the same size can, like the pear company did, and increase prices on it by a shocking  amount (a 50% increase is definitely shocking) or they could cut the size of the can.. so, chili company cut the size in hopes that I wouldn't stop buying their chili (it didn't work, I'm just going to start making homemade and freezing in individual servings .. I'll forgo the convenience of a can) 

But we are seeing huge inflation rates affecting food prices, and it's affecting them world wide. Back when my son was little, 25 dollars every two weeks would feed us.. now.. lol.. try making 12.50 feed three people for a week.. it won't happen not even a little.. you might get one day for that.. 

If they are predicting chocolate to go up in a sharp increase, it's because they are predicting something to cause the price increase in trade.. not because the chocolate companies care how much anyone eats.. all they want is to sell their products.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)